期刊文献+

不同剂量舒芬太尼诱导对心率变异性和脑电双频指数的影响 被引量:2

Shurentaini Guides the Effect to Pulses Deviancy and the Brain Electricity Pair of Frequency Exponent Different from Dosages
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的分析不同剂量舒芬太尼在全麻诱导对心率变异性和脑电双频指数的影响。方法回顾分析我院2009年1~12月间的30例应用舒芬太尼复合异丙酚全身麻醉患者的临床资料。结果各组气管插管操作均在1min内完成,均未见胸壁肌肉僵直发生。Ⅰ~Ⅲ组基础值比较均无明显差异;各组在麻醉诱导后各观察时点的脑电双频指数(BIS)值均低于基础值。插管前和插管即刻和插管后1、3、5minⅢ组BIS值均明显低于I组。术后随访病人均无术中知晓。诱导和插管期间各组心率变异性(HRV)无明显变化。结论不同剂量的舒芬太尼对气管插管引起血流动力学改变有差别,0.5~1.0μg/kg舒芬太尼更适合临床麻醉诱导。 Objective Analyse the effect that Shurentaini guides different from dosages in entire hemp to pulses deviancy and the brain electricity pair of frequency exponent.Methods Analytical 30 example application Shurentaini compound of my yard room in January,2009 in December,2009 of retrospect is different third phenol clinical data of general anaesthesia patient.Results The plunging tube handles every air tube of group not seeing that chest wall muscle is stiff without exception be completed,equal within l min happen.Ⅰ ~ Ⅲ group basis value has no obvious difference comparatively without exception;The BIS value that every puts set when observing respectively after anaesthetizing guidance is lower than basis value equally.Last 1,3,5 min Ⅲ the plunging tube prepares a plunging tube in the front preparing a plunging tube immediately,group BIS value is lower than the I group without exception obviously.The queen is aware of a skill in follow-up disease nothing per capita skill.During guidance and the plunging tube,every group HRV has no obvious change.Conclusion Shurentaini who is unlike dosages arouses blood flow Mechanics to air tube plunging tube change have a difference,0.5~1.0μg/kg Shurentaini is fit to anaesthetize guidance clinically more.
出处 《中外医疗》 2010年第20期43-44,共2页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 舒芬太尼 麻醉诱导 血流动力学 Shurentaini Anaesthetize guidance Blood flow Mechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献6

  • 1Ahonen J, Olkkola KT, Hynynen M, et al. Comparison of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil for total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Br J Anaesth, 2000,85: 533-540.
  • 2Thomson IR, Harding G, Hudson RJ. A comparison of fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2000,14:652-656.
  • 3陆红 王风杰 毕好生.小剂量舒芬太尼与硫喷妥钠、依托咪酯、静脉复合麻醉诱导及插管效果的比较[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1995,15:528-528.
  • 4Stahl KD, van Bever W, Janssen P, et al. Receptor affinity and pharmacological potency of a series of narcotic analgesic anti-diarrheal and neuroleptic drugs. Eur J Pharmacol, 1977,46:199-205.
  • 5Thomson IR, Henderson BT, Singh K, et al. Concentration-response relationships for fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesthesiology, 1998,89:852-861.
  • 6许正昌,殷广福,奚晓凤.复发性大肠癌再手术136例临床分析[J].中华普通外科杂志,1997,12(5):290-293. 被引量:11

共引文献186

同被引文献28

  • 1周少丽,蔡珺,葛勉,黑子清,黎尚荣.2种剂量舒芬太尼对丙泊酚靶控麻醉血流动力学和脑电双频指数影响[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2006,25(1):60-62. 被引量:8
  • 2肖彬,张兴安,吴群林,徐波,邵伟栋,施冲.靶控输注异丙酚复合瑞芬太尼或舒芬太尼全静脉麻醉[J].广东医学,2006,27(11):1683-1685. 被引量:12
  • 3赵艳,蒋建渝,张利萍.舒芬太尼靶控输注诱导时脑电双频指数及血流动力学的变化(前瞻性随机对照研究)[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(4):323-326. 被引量:19
  • 4Kreuer S, Bruhn J, Walter E, et al. Comparative pharmacodynamic modeling useing bispectml and narcotrend-index with and without a pharmacodynamic plateau during sevoflurane anesthesia [J]. Anesth Analg, 2008, 106:1171-1181.
  • 5Benthuysen JL, Foltz BD, Smith NT, et al. Prebypass hemodynamic stability of sufentanil, fentanyl, and morphine anesthesia during car- diac surgery: a comparison of cardiovascular profiles[J]. J Cardiotho- rae Anesth, 1988,2(6): 749-757.
  • 6Aime I, Gayat E, Fermanian C, et al. Effect of age on the compara- bility ofbispectral and stste entropy indices during the maintenance of propofol-sufentanil anaerthesia [J]. British Journal of Anaerthesia, 2012, 108(4): 638-643.
  • 7Panousis P, Heller AR, Burghardt M, et al. The effects of electromyo- graphic activity on the accuracy of the Nareotrend monitor compared with the Bispectral Index during combined anaesthesia [J]. Anaesthe- sia, 2007, 62(9): 868-874.
  • 8Bailey PL, Streisand JB, East KA, et al. Differences in magnitude and duration of opiod induced respiratory depression and analgesia with fentanyl and sufentanil[J]. Anesth Analg, 1990, 70(1): 8-15.
  • 9Sharer S, Varvel JR. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and ratio- nal opioid selection[J]. Anesthesiology, 1991, 74(1): 53-63.
  • 10Ferreira DA, Nunes CS, Antunes LM, et al. The effect of a remifen- tanil bolus on the bispectml index of the EEG (BIS) in anaesthetized patients independently fIom intubation and surgical stimuli [J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2006, 23(4): 305-310.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部