期刊文献+

北京协和医院健康体检妇女盆腔器官脱垂程度及其危险因素分析 被引量:11

Analysis of prevalence and risk factors of pelvic organ prolapse of women underwent gynecologic health care in Peking Union Medical College Hospital
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 研究北京协和医院常规体检妇女的盆腔器官脱垂(POP)情况及其临床特征,探讨其发病相关因素.方法 对2008年1月-2009年8月在本院行常规健康体检的972名成年妇女进行现场问卷调查以及妇科检杳,由专人采用POP定量分度(POP-Q)法九格表进行测量,并记录各项指标的测量值.结果 (1)观察对象的平均年龄为(42±10)岁(22~78岁),平均身高(162±5)cm(142~180 cm),平均体质量(59±8)kg(42~91 kg);83.8%(815/972)为已分娩妇女.972名妇女的平均阴道长度(TVL)为(8.20±0.35)cm.所有观察对象均未达到POP的诊断标准,其中35.5%(345/972)存在阴道后壁轻度膨出,96.7%(940/972)存在阴道前壁轻度膨出,但均无自觉症状.(2)972名妇女中,未分娩者的生殖道缝隙(gh)、TVL测量值及C、D点距处女膜缘的罡巨离分别为(2.26±0.32)、(8.08±0.30)、(-7.08±0.24)和(-8.08±0.30)cm,均小于已分娩者[分别为(2.33±0.39)、(8.22 ±0.35)、(-7.14±0.28)和(-8.22±0.35)cm],Ap、Bp点距处女膜缘的距离分别为(-2.87±0.22)、(-2.87±0.22)cm,均大于已分娩者[分别为(-2.81±0.25)、(-2.81±0.25)cm],以上各项两者间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05).与未分娩妇女比较,已分娩妇女阴道后壁膨出的风险增加(OR=1.819).(3)22~34岁、35~49岁及≥50岁者的POP-Q各项指标测量值比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05);22~34岁者与35~49岁者之间比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);22~34岁、35~49岁者分别与≥150岁者比较,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05).与22~34岁者比较,35~49岁及≥50岁者发生阴道后壁膨出的风险增高(OR=1.713、3.765).(4)绝经后妇女的POP-Q各项指标测馈值均小于未绝经妇女,差异也均有统计学意义(P〈0.05);与未绝经妇女比较,绝经后妇女阴道后壁膨出的风险增加(OR=3.354).结论 在我国健康体检的成年妇女中,以POP-Q法作为评价POP程度的指标时,轻度的阴道前、后壁膨出很常见,阴道前壁膨出较后壁膨出的检出率高,但通常并无症状,临床上不需干预.分娩史和年龄是影响阴道壁膨出严重程度及检出率的重要危险因素. Objective To investigate prevalence and risk factors of pelvic organ prolapse in women underwent routine gynecologic health care in Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH).Methods From Jan.2008 to Aug.2009,972 women underwent gynecological health care in PUMCH Were enrolled in this study.Questionnaires and pelfic examinations were given.The pelvic organ prolapse quantitive examination(POP-Q)system was used as the assessment tool.Results (1)Among all participants,the mean ages were(42±10)years(range 22 to 78 years),the mean height were(162±5)cm(range 142 to 180 cm),and the mean weight were(59±8)kg(range 42 to 91 kg).83.8%(815/972)of women were multipara.The mean total vagihal length(TVL)of 972 women was 8.20 cm.No women met the standard of pelvic organ prolapse, while 35.5% (345/972) of women presented mild posterior vaginal descent and 96. 7% (940/972) presented mild anterior vaginal descent, all of them were asymptomatic. (2) The length of genital hiatus (gh), TVL and C, D proximal to the hymen in nullipara were (2.26 ±0. 32), (8.08 ±0. 30), ( - 7.08 ± 0. 24) and ( - 8. 08 ± 0. 30) cm, which were significantly less than ( 2. 33 ± 0. 39 ),( 8. 22 ± 0. 35 ), ( - 7. 14 ± 0. 28 ) and ( - 8. 22 ± 0. 35 ) cm in multipara ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Ap and Pb proximal to the hymen of ( - 2. 87 ± 0. 22) and ( - 2. 87 ± 0. 22 ) cm in nullipara were significantly larger than ( -2.81 ±0.25) and ( -2.81 ±0.25) cm in multipara (P〈0.05). When compared with nullipara, the incidence of posterior and anterior vaginal wall protrusion were increased ( OR = 1. 819). (3) The index of POP-P were compared among women at groups of 22 -34 years, 35 -49 years and more than 50 years (P 〈0. 05 ). Those index did not show statistical difference between women at group of 22 - 34 years and group of 35 -49 years (P 〉0. 05). However, those in women at group of 22 -34 years and 35 -49 years showed statistical difference when compared with women at group of more than 50 years ( P 〈 0. 05 ). When compared with women at group of 22 - 34 years, the incidence of posterior and anterior vaginal wall protrusion were increased ( OR = 1. 713, 3. 765). (4) Menopause status was associated with severities of all kinds of descent ( P 〈 0. 05 ) and presence of posterior vaginal protrusion ( OR = 3. 354 ). Conclusions Mild anterior and posterior vaginal descent by POP-Q were common among women in China. The risk of anterior vaginal descent is relatively higher than posterior vaginal descent. However, most of the women with descent are asymptomatic and need no treatment. The most important factors associated with the severity and detectable ratio of descent is parity and age.
出处 《中华妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第7期501-505,共5页 Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 子宫脱垂 危险因素 体格检查 北京 Uterine prolapse Risk factors Physical exemination Beijing
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Mant J,Painter B,Vessey M.Epidemiology of genital prolapse:observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association study.Br J Obstet Gynaecol,1997,104:579-585.
  • 2Bump RC,Mattiassen A,B(o) K,et al.The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.Am J Obstet Gynecol,1996,175:10-17.
  • 3Hendrix SL,Clark AC,Nygaard I,et al.Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative gravity and gravidity.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2002,186:1160-1166.
  • 4Slieker-Ten Hove MC,Pool-Goudzwaard AL,Eijkemans MJ,al.Prediction model and prognostic index to estimate clinically relevant pelvic organ prolapse in a general female population.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct,2009,20:1013-1021.
  • 5Samuelsson EV,Arne Victor FT,Tibblin G,et al.Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors.Am J Obstet Gynecol,1999,180:299-305.
  • 6Bland DR,Earle BB,Bitolins MZ,et al.Use of the pelvic organ prolapse staging system of the International Continence Society,American Urogynecologie Society,and Society of Gynecologic Surgeons in perimenopausal women.Am J Obstet Gynecol,1999,181:1324-1327.
  • 7Swift SE.The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2000,183:277-285.
  • 8Seo JT,Kim JM.Pelvic organ support and prevalence by Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification (POP-Q) in Korean women.J Urol,2006,175:1769-1772.
  • 9Weber AM,Abrams P,Brubaker L,et al.The standardization of terminology for researchers in female pelvic floor disorders,Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct,2001,12:178-186.
  • 10Nygaard I,Bradley C,Brandt D.Pelvic organ prolapse in older women:prevalence and risk factors.Obstet Gynecol,2004,104:489-497.

同被引文献91

  • 1游珂,韩劲松,顾方颖,王秀云,高荣莲,张璐芳.传统阴式手术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂术后疗效研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(12):1192-1194. 被引量:45
  • 2张晓红,王建六.盆腔器官脱垂国际量化分期[J].中国医刊,2005,40(8):18-20. 被引量:28
  • 3Samuelsson EV, Victor FT, Tibblin G, et al. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999, 180(2 Pt 1):299-305.
  • 4Bland DR, Earle BB, Vitolins MZ, et al. Use of the pelvic organ prolapse staging system of the International Continence Society, American Urogynecologic Society, and Society of Gynecologic Surgeons in perimenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1999,181(6) : 1324-1328.
  • 5Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Be K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic flonr dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996,175( 1 ) : 10-17.
  • 6Murad-Regadas S, Peterson TV, Pinto RA, et al. Defecographic pelvic floor abnormalities in constipated patients: does mode of delivery matter? Tech Coloproctol, 2009,13 (d) : 279-283.
  • 7Francis WJ, Jeffcoate TN. Dyspareunia following vaginal operations. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw, 196!, 68 : 1- 10.
  • 8Milley PS, Nichols DH. A correlative investigation of' the human rectovaginal septum. Anat Rec, 1969,163 (3) : 443-451.
  • 9Petros PE. Vault prolapse : Restoration of dynamic vaginal supports by infracoccygeal sacropexy, an axial day-case vaginal procedure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2001,12 (5) : 296-303.
  • 10Richardson AC. The rectovaginal septum revisited : its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 1993,36(4) : 976-983.

引证文献11

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部