期刊文献+

颏部形态与正畸矫治拔牙设计的相关性研究 被引量:9

Correlative study between the protrusion of chin and orthodontic treatment plan about extraction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨颏部突度对临界拔牙病例矫治设计的影响.方法 选取50例年龄15~18岁之间已完成正畸治疗的错[牙合]畸形患者,男22名,女28名,平均年龄16.5岁.其中25例为拔牙矫治,拔除4个第一前磨牙,25例采用非拔牙矫治.矫治后侧貌良好,覆合覆盖正常,完成头影测量19项,并对50例临床牙[牙合]畸形拔牙与非拔牙病例正畸治疗前牙颌面硬组织、及软组织治疗前后变化进行对比的回顾性研究,进行成组设计和配对设计t检验,并进行拔牙概率的回顾性分析.结果 治疗前拔牙组与非拔牙组在Pog-NB与L1-NB测量项目在两组之间存在显著性差异,Pog-NB与拔牙概率存在高度相关关系.拔牙组颏部突度明显小于非拔牙组,下切牙唇倾度明显大于非拔牙组.而上前牙突度、倾斜度及上下颌骨突度项目在两组间不存在显著性差异.治疗前、后软组织在两组病例无统计学意义的差异.结论 对于临界拔牙病例制定矫治计划时,为达到良好的侧貌,避免产生正畸面容,要综合考虑影响侧貌的鼻唇颏协调一致.颏部突度越大,拔牙的概率越小,下切牙可在一定程度上唇倾来调整患者侧面曲线使其更为协调. Objective To determine the influence of chin on extraction in borderline cases. Methods Pre-treatment lateral cephalograms of 50 treated patients (25 first premolar extraction cases, 25 non-extraction cases) were collected and digitized. The average pre-treatment age was 16. 5 years (15-18 years). 19 cephalometric parameters were used for assessment. Comparison was made between extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment in borderline cases. The correlation analysis, t-test and Logistic regression analysis were used. Results Significant hard tissue changes were found between extraction and non-extraction cases. Extraction cases had smaller chin prominence. Logistic regression analysis showed that the probability of orthodontic extraction was significantly correlated with Pog-NB. Conclusions The important factor in determining extraction in borderline cases was the prominence of the chin. The probability of orthodontic extraction decreased with the increasing chin prominence.
出处 《中华口腔正畸学杂志》 2010年第2期89-93,共5页 Chinese Journal of Orthodontics
关键词 颏突 正畸拔牙 相关性 pognion orthodontics extraction correlation
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Ricketts RM.Esthetics,environment,and the law of lip relation.Am J Orthod,1968,54:272-289.
  • 2王兴,张震康,王洪君,杨凤鸣,宋辉.中国美貌人群的侧貌软组织X线头影测量研究[J].口腔医学纵横,1991,7(2):86-90. 被引量:94
  • 3Yogosawa F.Predicting soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment.Angle Orthod,1990,60:199-206.
  • 4Mackley RJ.An evaluation of smiles before and after orthodontic treatment.Angle Orthod,1993,63:183-189.
  • 5Negar M.A quantitative method for the evaluation of the soft tissue facial profile.Am J Orhod,1959,45:738-746.
  • 6罗卫红,傅民魁.青少年面部侧貌美学特征的临床分析与研究[J].口腔正畸学,2000,7(1):23-25. 被引量:49
  • 7Czamecki ST,Nanda RS,Currier GF.Perceptions of balanced facial profile.Am J Orthod Denofac Orthop,1993,104:118.
  • 8许天民 黄薇.正畸医师临床判断拔牙与非拔牙与否的一致性的研究[J].口腔正畸学杂志,2009,9:14-16.
  • 9Steiner CC.Cephalometrics for you and me.Am J Orthod,1953,39:729.
  • 10Downs WB.Variation in facial relationship,Their significance in treatment and prognosis.Am J Orthod,1948,44:812.

二级参考文献41

  • 1许天民,王莉,曾金玲,林久祥.安格尔Ⅱ^1类减数矫治:我们到底能引起哪些硬组织侧貌的改变?[J].口腔正畸学,2000,7(1):13-15. 被引量:23
  • 2徐如生,王丽君.正畸治疗中拔牙部位的选择[J].现代口腔医学杂志,1989,3(3):184-184. 被引量:1
  • 3傅民魁.正常He颅面结构的电子计算机头影测量研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1984,2:109-109.
  • 4Proffit WR,Forty-year review of extraction frequencies at a university orthodontic dinia Angle Orthod,1994,64:407-414.
  • 5Keim RG,Gottlieb EL,Nelson AH,et al.2002 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures.Part 1.Results and trends.J Clin Orthod,2002,36:553-568.
  • 6Schwab DT.The borderline patient and tooth remove.Am J Orthod,1971,59:126-145.
  • 7Zachrisson BU.Clinical outcome with mandibular second versus first premolar extractions in orthodontic treatment.World J Orthod,2005,6:296-303.
  • 8Profit WR.Contemporary orthodontics.4th ed.St.Louis:Mosby,2007:283.
  • 9Schoppe RJ.An analusis of second premolar extraction procedures.Angle Orthod,1964,34:292-302.
  • 10Kim TK,Kim JT,Mah J,et al.First or second premolar extraction effects on facial vertical dimension.Angle Orthod,2005,75:177-182.

共引文献162

同被引文献60

引证文献9

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部