期刊文献+

肾移植术后三种免疫抑制方案不良反应的对比研究 被引量:4

Comparative Study on the Side Effects of Three Immunosuppressant Regimens in Recipient Renal Allograft
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价不同免疫抑制方案在肾移植中应用的安全性。方法:采用前瞻性、随机、对照研究。根据肾移植术后所用免疫抑制方案将180例肾移植患者随机分为3组,A组:环孢霉素A(CsA)+霉酚酸酯(MMF)+泼尼松(Pred);B组:普乐可复(FK506)+MMF+Pred;C组:CsA+硫唑嘌呤(Aza)+Pred。术后随访18~62个月,观察3组用药后的药物不良反应。结果:在不良反应总发生率方面,A、B、C组的差异有统计学意义(x^2=20.05,P<0.05)。在胃肠道反应、肾移植术后糖尿病、感染发生率方面,A、B、C组的差异无统计学意义(x^2=5.07,P>0.05);而在肾毒性、高血压发生率方面,A、B、C组的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),C组明显高于A、B组;在多毛、牙龈增生、骨髓抑制、高血脂、肝毒性的发生率方面,A、B、C组的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),A、C组明显高于B组。结论:在药物不良反应方面,以FK506、MMF、Pred组成的免疫抑制方案较CsA、MMF、Pred方案和CsA、Aza、Pred方案相对安全。 Objective:To evaluate the safety of different immunosuppressant regimens in renal allograft recipients. Methods: According to different immunosuppressant regimens, 180 renal allograft recipients were randomly divided into three groups: group A receiving cyclosporin A (CsA), mycophenolate mofeltil (MMF) and Prednisone (Pred) ;group B receiving taerolimus (FK506), MMF and Pred; group C receiving CsA, azathioprine (Aza) and Pred. The incidences of drug side effects were observed in each group 18 to 62 months after operation. Results: There was obvious significant difference in general incidence rate in the three groups(x^2 = 20.05, P〈0.01). There was no significant difference in gastrointestinal tract reaction , posttransplant diabetes mellitus and infection rate in the three groups(x^2= 5.07, P〉0.05). The incidence of renal toxicity and hypertension in group C was obviously higher than in groups A and B (P〈0.05). The incidence of hairiness,gingival hyperplasia,arrest of bone marrow, hyperlipidemia and liver toxicity in groups A and C was obviously higher than in groups B (P〈0.05). Conclusions: At the aspect of drug side effects,the immunosuppressant regimen of FK506, MMF and Pred was relatively safer than the immunosuppressant regimens of CsA, MMF, Pred And CsA, Aza, Pred.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 北大核心 2010年第7期507-509,513,共4页 Journal of Clinical Urology
关键词 肾移植 免疫抑制方案 不良反应 kidney transplantation immunosuppressant regimen agents side effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1曾甫清,黄黎明.肾移植临床免疫抑制方案的应用[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2003,18(8):449-451. 被引量:3
  • 2Roozbeh J,Mehdizadeh A R,Razmkon A,et al.Incidence of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus in kidney transplantation:a single-center experience[J].Transplant Proc,2005,37:3095-3097.
  • 3Lee A U,Farrell G C.Mechanism of azathioprine-induced injury to hepatocytes:roles of glutathione depletion and mitochondrial injury[J].J Hepatol,2001,35:756-764.
  • 4Arnold A N,Wombolt D G,Whelan T V,et al.Mycophenolate mofetil,with cyclosporine and prednisone,reduces early rejection while allowing the use of less antilymphocytic agent induction and cyclosporine in renal recipients with delayed graft function[J].Clin Transplant,2000,14:421-426.
  • 5高振利,赵俊杰,孙德康,王琳,杨典东,王科,王建明.400例肾移植后随访五年的临床分析[J].中华器官移植杂志,2007,28(11):690-692. 被引量:3
  • 6Asberg A,Midtvedt K,Vassbotn T,et al.Better microvascular function on long-term treatment with lisinopril than with nifedipine in renal transplant recipients[J].Nephrol Dial Transplant,2001,16:1465-1470.
  • 7Radwan-Oczko M,Boratynska M,Klinger M,et al.Risk factors of gingival overgrowth in kidney transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine A[J].Ann Transplant,2003,8:57-62.
  • 8Bartoli F,Castronovo G,Stabile A.Risk factors conditioning the incidence and severity of cyclosporine A-induced gingival overgrowth and methods of prevention[J].Minerva Stomatol,2004,53:165-170.
  • 9Mathieu R L,Casez J P,Jaeger P,et al.Altered body composition and fuel metabolism in stable kidney transplant patients on immunosuppressive monotherapy with cyclosporine A[J].Eur J Clin Invest,1994,24:195-200.
  • 10Cofan F,Zambon D,Rodriguez C,et al.Fatty acid composition in low-denSity lipoproteins from renal transplant recipients[J].Transplant Proc,1999,31:2330-2332.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Banasik M, Klinger M. Chronic allograft nephropathy-immunologic and nonimmunologic factors. Ann Transplant, 2006, 11(1):7-10.
  • 2Afzali B, Shah S, Chowdhury P, et al. Low-dose rnycopheno late mofetil is an effective and safe treatment to permit phased reduction in calcineurin inhibitors in chronic allograft nephropathy. Transplantation, 2005, 79(3) :304-309.
  • 3Bakker RC, Hollander AA, Mallat MJ, et al. Conversion from cyclosporine to azathioprine at three months reduces the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy. Kidney Int, 2003, 64(3) : 1027-1034.
  • 4Terasaki PI, Cai J. Humoral theory of transplantation: further evidence. Curr Opin Immunol, 2005, 17 (5) : 541-545.
  • 5Cattaneo D, Perico N, Gaspari F, et al. Glucocorticoids interfere with mycophenolate mofetil bioavailability in kidney transplantation. Kidney lnt, 2002, 62(3):1060-1067.
  • 6Shipkova M, Armstrong VVC,Kuypers D, et al. Effect of cyclosporine withdrawal on mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients with deteriorating renal function: preliminary report. Ther Drug Monit, 2001, 23 (6): 717-721.
  • 7Johnson C, Ahsan N, Gonwa T, et al. Randomized trial of tacrolimus (Prograf) in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) with mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation. Transplantation, 2000, 69(5):834-841.
  • 8Jensik SC. Tacrolimus (FK506) in kidney transplantation: three-year survival results of the US multicenter, randomized, comparative trial. Transplant Proc, 1998, 30 (4) : 1216-1218.
  • 9Vincenti F, Jensik SC, Filo RS, et al. A long-term comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine in kidney transplantation: evidence for improved allograft survival at five years. Transplantation, 2002, 73 (5) : 775-782.
  • 10Pirsch JD, Miller J, Deierhoi MH, et al. A comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression after cadaveric renal transplantation. FK506 Kidney Transplant Study Group. Transplantation, 1997, 63(7) :977-983.

共引文献9

同被引文献37

  • 1段丽君,江霞.糖皮质激素在器官移植中的应用[J].实用器官移植电子杂志,2014,2(2):77-79. 被引量:4
  • 2国家食品药品监督管理局药品安全监管司,国家药品不良反应中心编.药品不良反应报告和监测工作手册[S].2005:46.
  • 3中华医学会.临床诊疗指南-器官移植学分册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:8.
  • 4Busuttil RW,Klintmalm GK.肝移植[M]. 2 版.上海:第二军医大学出版社,2009: 919-945.
  • 5国家食品药品监督管理局药品安全监管司,国家药品不良反应中心.药品不良反应报告和监测工作手册[S]. 2005 : 46.
  • 6Staatz CE,Taylor PJ,Lynch SV,et ai. Population pharmacokineticsof tacrolimus in children who receive cut-down of full liver trans-plants[ J]. Transplantation, 2001,72(6) : 1056-1061.
  • 7Imanieh MH, Erjaee A, Dehghani SM, et al. Early postoperativecomplications of pediatric liver transplantation [ J ]. Indian Pediatr,2009, 46(12) : 88-90.
  • 8Piscitelli SC,Rodvold KA,Pai MP.感染性疾病治疗中的药物相互作用[M]. 3版,北京:北京大学医学出版社,2014: 371-388.
  • 9Berengue JI, Lopez-Espinoza JA, Ortega-Lopez J, et al. Two-to-three-fold increase in blood tacrolimus ( FK506) levels during dia-rrhea in liver-transplanted children [ J ]. Clin Transplant,2003,17(3) : 249-253.
  • 10Mc Diarmid S V,Anand R,Lindblad A S,et al.Studies of pediatric liver transplantation:2002 update.An overview of demographics,indications,timing,and immunosuppressive practices in pediatric liver transplantation in the United States and Canada[J].Pediatr Transplant,2004,8(3):284-294.

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部