期刊文献+

肺癌日间化疗的安全性分析 被引量:17

Safety Analysis of Ambulatory Chemotherapy in Lung Cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 背景与目的日间化疗因具经济成本低、毒副反应不高的特点成为发达国家普遍采用的一种化疗模式,本文探讨上海市胸科医院日间化疗模式的可行性及安全性,为今后日间化疗模式的推广提供借鉴。方法对所有入住日间化疗病房和普通化疗病房患者进行统计和记录,主要内容包括患者一般状况、化疗次数、病理类型、住院期间毒副反应、出院后出现的毒副反应。结果2008年10月-2009年4月,我院日间病房共收治化疗患者416人次,普通病房共收治患者1157人次,两组化疗的毒副反应总体差异不大,日间化疗患者的II度以上胃肠道反应(21.88%)较住院患者低(38.89%)(P<0.01),白细胞降低比例(49.28%)较住院患者(35.0%)为多(P<0.01),日间化疗病房住院天数缩短(4.48天vs14.04天,P<0.01),医疗支出也大大降低(6911.32元vs14623.59元,P<0.01)。结论日间化疗的住院时间和费用缩短,主要毒副反应为白细胞降低,化疗的累积毒性是其主要原因,需要引起注意,其它毒副反应未见明显差异,日间化疗是一种值得推广和借鉴的方式。 Background and objective Ambulatory chemotherapy has now been a popular way of treatment in developed countries, for its less medical costs and incidence of adverse events. The aim of this study is to estimate the feasibility and safety of ambulatory chemotherapy in lung cancer in Shanghai chest hospital. Methods Medical data including performance status, cycles of chemotherapy, pathologic type, adverse events in hospital and adverse events after discharge from hospital. Results We estimated a total of 1 573 lung cancer patients admitted in Shanghai chest hospital, during October 2008 to April 2009, including 416 patients treated in the way of ambulatory chemotherapy, 1 157 patients treated in the routine way. Rate of grade III/IV gastrointestinal toxicity was fewer in the ambulatory chemotherapy group (21.88%) than routine chemotherapy group (P0.01); meanwhile, rate of leukopenia was higher in the ambulatory chemotherapy group (49.28%) than routine chemotherapy group (35.0%)(P0.01). Days of hospitalization and medical costs were less in the ambulatory chemotherapy group (4.48 d vs 14.04 d, $6 911.32 vs $14 623.59, all P0.01). Conclusion Ambulatory chemotherapy is a favorable way to promote.
出处 《中国肺癌杂志》 CAS 2010年第7期713-716,共4页 Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
关键词 肺肿瘤 日间化疗 安全性 Lung neoplasms Ambulatory chemotherapy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1沈洪兵,俞顺章.我国肺癌流行现状及其预防对策[J].中国肿瘤,2004,13(5):283-285. 被引量:139
  • 2Yoneda S. Outpatient chemotherapy for lung cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 2007, 34(4): 533-537.
  • 3Sakuyama T, Aiba K, Inoue D, et al. Current status and problems in the chemotherapy of our outpatient clinic in the department of clinical ontology. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 2005, 32(1): 4-8.
  • 4邢红.化学治疗日间治疗中心模式的探讨[J].上海护理,2003,3(4):46-47. 被引量:8
  • 5林春华,王春妹,杜香琴.我院门诊化疗病人管理模式改革[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,2008,22(6):548-549. 被引量:6
  • 6Gandhi TK, Bartel SB, Shulman LN, et al. Medication safety in the ambulatory chemotherapy setting. Cancer, 2005, 104(11 ): 2477-2483.
  • 7Hoang T, Xu R, Schiller JH, et al. Clinical model to predict survival in chemonaive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with third-generation chemotherapy regimens based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group flata.J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(1): 175-183.

二级参考文献19

共引文献150

同被引文献149

引证文献17

二级引证文献138

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部