期刊文献+

局限期小细胞肺癌放疗靶区前瞻性随机对照研究的初步报告 被引量:7

A Prospective Randomized Study of the Radiotherapy Volume for Limited-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Preliminary Report
暂未订购
导出
摘要 背景与目的在局限期小细胞肺癌(limited-stage small cell lung cancer,LSCLC)的放化疗综合治疗中,放疗靶区等方面尚存争议。本研究旨在前瞻性比较LSCLC经诱导化疗后按不同靶区范围进行放疗的局部控制率和毒副反应的差异及对生存的影响。方法LSCLC患者,经EP方案诱导化疗2周期后,随机分为研究组和对照组,分别按照化疗后和化疗前原发灶范围勾画放疗靶区(gross tumor volume-tumor,GTV-T),区域淋巴结靶区(gross tumor volume-nodal,CTV-N)两组均包括达到诊断标准的淋巴结所在的结区。放疗45Gy/30次/19天,开始于化疗后1周-2周,放疗中按期进行第3周期化疗。放疗后再行3周期化疗。完全缓解者行预防性全脑照射(prophylactic cranial irra-diation,PCI)。结果研究组与对照组分别入组37例、40例患者。局部复发率分别为32.4%、28.2%(P=0.80),其中单独照射野外复发率分别为3.0%、2.6%(P=0.91),且均位于原发病灶同侧锁骨上区。纵隔型N3是照射野外复发危险因素(P=0.02,OR=14.13,95%CI:1.47-136.13);放疗期间发生I度、II度体重减轻分别为29.4%、5.9%和56.4%、7.7%(P=0.04);0度-I度和II度-III度后期放射性肺损伤发生率分别为97.1%、2.9%和84.6%、15.4%(P=0.07)。研究组和对照组中位生存时间分别为22.1个月和26.9个月;1、2、3年总生存率分别为77.9%、44.4%、37.3%及75.8%、56.3%、41.7%(P=0.79)。结论本研究结果显示仅照射化疗后原发灶范围及阳性淋巴结区未降低局部控制率和总生存率,而放疗毒性降低。但目前样本量尚未达到设计要求,最终结论需继续扩大样本数后得出。 Background and objective Controversies exists with regard to target volumes as far as thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) is concerned in the multimodality treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC). The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the local control rate, toxicity profiles, and overall survival (OS) between patients received different target volumes irradiation after induction chemotherapy. Methods LSCLC patients received 2 cycles of etoposide and cisplatin (EP) induction chemotherapy and were randomly assigned to receive TRT to either the post-or pre-chemotherapy tumor extent (GTV-T) as study arm and control arm, CTV-N included the positive nodal drainage area for both arms. One to 2 weeks after induction chemotherapy, 45 Gy/30 Fx/19 d TRT was administered concurrently with the third cycle of EP regimen. After that, additional 3 cycles of EP consolidation were administered. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was administered to patients with a complete response. Results Thirty-seven and 40 patients were randomly assigned to study arm and control arm. The local recurrence rates were 32.4% and 28.2% respectively (P=0.80); the isolated nodal failure (INF) rates were 3.0% and 2.6% respectively (P=0.91); all INF sites were in the ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa. Medastinal N3 disease was the risk factor for INF (P=0.02, OR=14.13, 95%CI: 1.47-136.13). During radiotherapy, grade I, II weight loss was observed in 29.4%, 5.9% and 56.4%, 7.7% patients respectively (P=0.04). Grade 0-I and II-III late pulmonary injury was developed in 97.1%, 2.9% and 86.4%, 15.4% patients respectively (P=0.07). Median survival time was 22.1 months and 26.9 months respectively. The 1 to 3-year OS were 77.9%, 44.4%, 37.3% and 75.8%, 56.3%, 41.7% respectively (P=0.79). Conclusion The preliminary results of this study indicate that irradiant the post-chemotherapy tumor extent (GTV-T) and positive nodal drainage area did not decrease local control and overall survival while radiation toxicity was reduced. But the current sample size has not met designed requirements, and further investigation is warranted before final conclusions could be drawn.
出处 《中国肺癌杂志》 CAS 2010年第7期691-699,共9页 Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
关键词 肺肿瘤 小细胞肺癌 局限期 放疗靶区 Lung neoplasms Small cell lung cancer Limited-stage Radiation target volume
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Faivre-Finn C, Lorigan P, West C, et al. Thoracic radiation radiotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: unanswered questions. Clin Lung Cancer, 2005, 7(1): 23-29.
  • 2Pignon JP, Arriagada R, Idhe D, et al. A meta-analysis of thoracic radiotherapy for small-ceU lung cancer. N EnglJ Med, 1992, 327(23): 1618-1622.
  • 3Warde P, Payne D. Does thoracic irradiation improve survival and local control in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 1992, 10(6): 890-895.
  • 4Sundstrom S, Bremnes RM, Kaasa S, et al. Cisplatin and etoposide regimen is superior to cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and vincristine regimen in small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized phase III trial with 5 years' follow-up.J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20(24): 4665-4672.
  • 5Turrisi AT 3rd, Kim K, Blum R, et al. Twice-daily compared with once-daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer treated concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide. N EnglJ Med, 1999, 340(4): 265-267.
  • 6Schild SE, Bolmer JA, Hillman S, et al. Results of a phase II study of highdose thoracic radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin and etoposide in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (NCCTG 95-20-53).J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25(21): 3124-3129.
  • 7Baas P, Belderbos JS, Senan S, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy (carboplatin, paclitaxel, etoposide) and involved-field radiotherapy in limited stage small cell lung cancer: A Dutch multicenter phase II study. Br J Cancer, 2006, 94(5): 625-630.
  • 8Spiro SG, James LE, Rudd RM, et al. London Lung Cancer Group. Early compared with late radiotherapy in combined modality treatment for limited disease small-cell lung cancer: A London Lung Cancer Group multicenter randomized clinical trial and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(24): 3823-3830.
  • 9Chen GY, Jiang GL, Wang LJ, et al. Cisplatin/etoposide chemotherapy combined with twice daily thoracic radiotherapy for limited small-cell lung cancer: a clinical phase II trail. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2005, 61 (1): 70-75.
  • 10Bogart JA, Herndon JE, Lyss AP, et al. 70 Gy thoracic radiotherapy is feasible concurrent with chemotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: Analysis of Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 39808. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004, 59(2): 460-468.

同被引文献73

  • 1孙京栋,李衍杭,王瑞斐,张宗春,贺文茜.EP方案化疗联合分段加速超分割放射治疗局限期小细胞肺癌的研究[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2004,13(2):137-137. 被引量:2
  • 2刘林,蒋仁超,王卓才,曾伟生,罗宏彪,彭秀凡.非小细胞肺癌淋巴结大小与转移的关系[J].中国肿瘤临床,2004,31(16):931-933. 被引量:13
  • 3王长利,尤健,孙承军,姜宏景,张熙曾.肺癌胸内淋巴结转移规律及其临床意义[J].中国肺癌杂志,2004,7(5):438-441. 被引量:27
  • 4De Ruysscher D, Bremer RH, Koppe F, et al. Omission of e- lective node irradiation on basis of CT - scans in patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer:A phase I1 trial[ J ]. Radiother Onco1,2006,80 ( 3 ) :307 - 312.
  • 5Videtic GM, Belderbos JS, Spring Kong FM, et al. Report from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)con- sultantsineeting on elective nodal irradiation in lung cancer: small -cell lung cancer(SCLC) [ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Bi- ol Phys ,2008 ,72 ( 2 ) : 327 - 334.
  • 6Miller AA, Wang XF, Bogart JA, et al. Phase II trial of pa- clitaxel- topotecan -etoposide followed by consolidation chemoradiotherapy for limited - stage small cell lung canc- er: CALGB 30002 [ J ]. J Thorae Oncol, 2007,2 ( 7 ) : 645 - 651.
  • 7Faivre - Finn C, Falk S. CONVERT : concurrent once - daily versus twice - daily radiotherapy - a new phase HI random- ized controlled trial for patients with limited - stage small cell lung cancer and good performance status [ J ]. Lung Cancer, 2009,63 (2) : S 12.
  • 8Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D, et al. Changing epide- miology of small - cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years : analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database[ J ]. J Clin Oncol,2006,24 ( 28 ) : 4539 - 4544.
  • 9Turrisi AT, Kim K, Blum R, et al. Twice - daily compared with once -daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small- cell lung cancer treated concurrently with cisplatin and eto- poside[ J]. N Engl J Med,1999,340(4) :265 -271.
  • 10Natsuo T, Takeshi K,Toyoaki H, et al. The impact of radia- tion dose and fractionation on outcomes for limited - stage small -cell lung cancer [ J ]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2010,76(4) :1121 - 1126.

引证文献7

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部