期刊文献+

自控腰-硬膜外联合阻滞麻醉分娩镇痛的效果评价 被引量:4

自控腰-硬膜外联合阻滞麻醉分娩镇痛的效果评价
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨自控腰硬膜联合阻滞用于分娩镇痛的效果。方法选择该院定期产前检查且自愿要求自控腰硬联合阻滞麻醉分娩镇痛的产妇1062例为观察组,选择同期1084例定期产检、传统方式分娩的产妇为对照组。比较两组产妇的疼痛程度、产程时间、产后出血量、新生儿窒息情况等。结果两组产妇的疼痛程度、产程时间、产后出血量等比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论自控腰硬膜联合阻滞麻醉分娩镇痛是目前一种理想的以产妇为中心的产时服务模式,可以减轻产妇疼痛、缩短产程、减少产后出血和提高满意度,有利于提高产科质量,促进母婴健康,值得推广。 Objective To investigate the joint-controlled lumbar epidural block for labor analgesia effect. Methods Hospital antenatal care and voluntary requirements on a regular basis combined spinal and epidural anesthesia-controlled analgesia for the 1062 cases of maternal observation group, select the same period in 1084 cases on a regular basis for check-ups, traditional birth mothers as the control group. Results Com- pared two groups of maternal pain levels, labor time, the amount of postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal asphyxia and so on. The results of two sets of maternal pain levels, time, labor, postpartum blood loss and so the differ- ence was statistically significant ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion Controlled combined spinal epidural block anesthe- sia analgesia is an ideal for maternity-centered service model in production, can reduce maternal pain, shorten- ing birth process, reduce post-partum haemorrhage and improve satisfaction, help improve the quality of obstet- rics, the promotion of maternal and child health, are worth promoting.
出处 《中国实用医药》 2010年第19期41-43,共3页 China Practical Medicine
关键词 自控腰-硬膜联合阻滞麻醉 分娩镇痛 效果评价 Patient-controlled epidural Analgesis Process of parturition
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献12

共引文献329

同被引文献47

  • 1贾真,苏中宏,马欣,刘晓明,杨建军,徐建国.罗比卡因复合舒芬太尼行硬膜外分娩镇痛的最低有效浓度探讨[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(3):183-186. 被引量:35
  • 2盛娅仪,陈杰.不同浓度罗哌卡因复合芬太尼可行走硬膜外分娩镇痛的临床观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(6):514-515. 被引量:40
  • 3蔡永仪,钟丽霞.腰硬联合麻醉分娩镇痛的效果观察和护理[J].中国营养保健,2012,11(17):4667-4668.
  • 4Hawkins JL. Epidural analgesia for Labour and delivery[J]. N Engl J Med,2010,362(16):1503-1510.
  • 5Akerman N, Dresner M. The management of breakthrough pain during Labour[J]. CNS Drugs, 2009,23 (8):669-679.
  • 6Lim Y,Ocampo CE,Supandji M,et al. A randomized con- trolled trial of three patient-controlled epidural analgesia regimens for labor[J]. Anesth Analg,2008,107(6) : 1968- 1972.
  • 7Belizan JM,Althabe F,Cafferata ML. Health consequences of the increasing caesarean section rates. Epidemiology, 2007,18 (4) : 485-486.
  • 8Piosik ZM, Helbo-Hansen S, Sprehn M. [Ultrasound- guided performance of labour epidural analgesia in a patient with thoracolumbar scoliosis. ] Ugeskr Laeger, 2015,177 (2A).
  • 9Lovach-Chepujnoska M,Nojkov J,Joshevska-Jovanovska S, et al. Continuous versus patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labour analgesia and their effects on maternal motor function and ambulation. Prilozi,2014,35(2) :76-84.
  • 10Sng BL,Woo D,Leong WL,etal. Comparison of computer- integrated patient- controlled epidural analgesia with no initial basal infusion versus moderate basal infusion for labor and delivery: A randomized controlled trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol,2014,30 (4) : 496-501.

引证文献4

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部