期刊文献+

颅内动脉狭窄支架成形术后影响分支缺血性事件的临床因素探讨 被引量:4

The assessment of clinical factors relate to side branches ischemic events after stenting for intracranial artery stenosis
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨颅内动脉狭窄支架成形术(ICASS)后支架置入与临床对应分支缺血性事件的相关性及其影响因素。方法 21例24支颅内大动脉狭窄,行血管内支架成形术。其中大脑中动脉(MCA)15支,椎动脉(VA)5支,基底动脉(BA)3支和颈内动脉(ICA)1支。20支血管(MCA 14支,VA 3支,BA 2支和ICA 1支)为症状性重度狭窄、1支(BA)为无症状性重度狭窄;3支血管(MCA 1支和VA 2支)为症状性中度狭窄。比较评价支架成形术对分支缺血性损害、总体预后等方面的影响。结果无支架置入性相关分支缺血性损害的表现,随访期(6~27个月)内无再狭窄;所有患者均无手术相关性并发症。结论在围手术期规范化临床干预下,颅内动脉狭窄支架成形术不会导致明显的理论性支架相关性分支缺血性并发症,但这还需要进一步的验证。 Objective To discuss the affective factors and relations of clinical ischemic events to the side branches following stenting for intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS). Methods 21 patients with 24 branches stenosis of intracranial large artery were treated by stenting. Among them, 15 MCA,5 VA,3 BA andl ICA. 20 vessels(14 MCA,3 VA,2 BA and 1 ICA) are symptom and 1 vessel (BA) is asymptomatic with severe stenosis,3 vessels (1 MCA and 2 VA) are symptomatic medium stenosis. To compare and evaluate clinic affective factors of stent to stent-related ischemic damages and overall prognosis. Result There was no related ischemic complications of the side branches following stenting. There was no restenosis in follow-up period (6 -27 months) and complications related to stenting for the all. Conclusion There were no obvious isehemic complications related to theoretic branches covered following stenting with standard therapy for the patients with ICASS, but it needs further studies.
出处 《临床神经外科杂志》 CAS 2010年第2期77-79,共3页 Journal of Clinical Neurosurgery
基金 深圳市科技立项课题(编号200603093)
关键词 颅内动脉狭窄 支架 分支缺血性事件 intracranial artery stenosis stent side branches ischemic event
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献82

  • 1陶庆玲,孙瑄,赵晖,姚胜旗.颅内动脉狭窄的支架成形术与内科治疗的疗效观察[J].中华神经外科杂志,2006,22(4):233-235. 被引量:36
  • 2张静波,吴中学,王忠诚,李佑祥,姜除寒,贺红卫,姜鹏,吕明,刘爱华,尹可,李险峰,赵均峰.带膜支架治疗出血性脑血管病初步经验[J].中华神经外科杂志,2006,22(8):457-459. 被引量:26
  • 3[1]Sacco RI,Kargman DE,Gu Q,et al.Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction.The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study[J].Stroke,1995,26:14-20.
  • 4[2]Wityk RJ,Lehman D,Klag M,et al.Race and sex differences in the distribution of cerebral atherosclerosis[J].Stroke,1996,27:1274-1980.
  • 5[3]Wholey MH,Wholey M,Mathias K,et al.Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent placement[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2000,50:160-167.
  • 6[4]Ohki T,Marin ML,Lyon RT,et al.Ex vivo human carotid artery bifurcation stenting:correlation of lesion characteristics with embolic potential[J].J Vasc Surg,1998,27:463-471.
  • 7[5]Food and Drug Administration.Wingspan stent system and gateway PTA balloon catheter:summary of safety and probable benefit (EB/OL)].(2005-08-03).http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf5/h050001 b.pdf.
  • 8[6]The SSYLVIA Study Investigations.Stenting of Symptomatic Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Vertebral or Intracranial arteries(SSYLVIA):study result[J].Stroke,2004,35:1388-1392.
  • 9[7]Rishi G,Firas AA,Ajith J,et al.Safety,feasibility,and short-term follow-up of drug-eluting stent placement in the intracranial and extracranial circulation[J].Stroke,2006,37:2562-2566.
  • 10[8]Alex AC,Qasim B,Jay S,et al.Drug-eluting stents for treatment of intracranial atherosclerosis[J].Stroke,2005,36:165-168.

共引文献76

同被引文献57

  • 1姜卫剑,戴建平,杜彬,王拥军,金旻,徐晓彤,董可辉,马宁,王清河,曲辉.症状性颅内动脉狭窄支架成形术[J].中华神经外科杂志,2005,21(2):75-79. 被引量:29
  • 2Higashida RT,Meyers PM,Connors JJ,et al.Intracranial angioplasty and stenting for cercbral atherosclerosis:a position statement of the american society of interventional and therapeutic neuroradiology,society of interventional radiology,and the american society of neuroradiology[J].J.Vascular and Interventional Radiology,2005,16:1281.
  • 3The SSYLVIA Study Investigators.Stenting of Symtopatic Atherosclerotic Lesions in Intracranial Arteries study results[J].J.Stroke,2004,35:1388.
  • 4Levy EL,Hanel RA,Bendok BR,et al.Staged stent-assisted angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis[J].J Neurosurg,2002,97:1294.
  • 5Fiorella D,Levy EI,Turk AS,et al.US multicenter experience with the wingspan stent system for the treatment of intracranial atheromatous disease:Periprocedural results[J].Stroke,2007:38:881.
  • 6Bose A,Hartmann M,Henkes H,et al.A Novel,Self-expanding,nitinol stent inmedically refractory intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses:The Wingspan study[J].Stroke,2007,38:1531.
  • 7Wityk RJ, Lehman D, Klag M, et al. Race and sex differences in the distribution of cerebral atherosclerosis. Stroke, 1996, 27: 1974-1980.
  • 8Arenillas JF, Mohna CA, Montaner J, et al. Progression and clinical recurrence of symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis: a long-term follow-up transcranial Doppler ultrasound study. Stroke,2001,32:2898-2904.
  • 9Yuan JL, Bruno A, Li T, et al. Replication and Extension of the Simplified Modified Rankin Scale in 150 Chinese Stroke Patients. Eur Neurol, 2012,67:206-210.
  • 10Kim DJ, Lee BH, Kim DI, et al. Stent-assisted angioplasty of sy-mptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis : feasibility and follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2005, 26 : 1381-1388.

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部