期刊文献+

结肠J型小贮袋与直接吻合在直肠癌低位前切除术后早期结果比较的Meta分析 被引量:3

A Meta-analysis about early results of small J-pouch versus straight anastomosis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:比较中、下段直肠癌低位前切除术后肠道J型小贮袋(≤8cm)吻合与直接吻合术中及术后早期结果。方法:通过电子检索PubMed、Medline、Ovid、Cochrane数据库,查找1995年1月—2009年12月符合入选标准的随机对照临床试验,选取手术重建成功率、手术时间、术后平均住院天数、手术死亡率、吻合口漏、伤口感染、肺部感染等指标作为研究内容,采用RevMan5.0.23软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入文献9篇(580例)。结肠小贮袋或直接吻合两种方式在手术重建成功率、手术死亡率、吻合口漏、伤口感染、肺部感染等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);手术时间及术后平均住院天数因资料不足未进行分析。结论:直肠癌低位前切除术后采用结肠小贮袋或直接吻合重建肠道,术中、术后早期结果相似,两种方法都是安全、有效的。 Objective:To compare early results while performing relative small J-pouch(≤8 cm) reconstruction and straight colorectal/coloanal reconstruction after low anterior resection for mid and low rectal cancer.Methods:According to the inclusion criteria,a search of randomized controlled trials in PubMed,Medline,Ovid and Cochrane database(from Jan 1995 to Dec 2009)was performed.Outcomes of interest included recons truction failure,operating time,postoperative mortality,hospital stay,anastomotic leakage,wound infection and pneumonic infection after the primary procedure.Statistical analysis software RevMan 5.0.23 was used to carry Meta-analysis.Results:Nine studies of RCT containing 580 patients were included.There was no significant difference of reconstruction failure,postoperative mortality,anastomotic leakage,wound infection or pneumonic infection between two groups(P〉0.05).The comparison of operating time and hospital stay was not performed due to insufficient data.Conclusion:Relative small J-pouch and straight anastomos is provided similar early results after low anterior resection.Both of these methods were proved to be safe and effective.
出处 《中国现代普通外科进展》 CAS 2010年第4期266-269,279,共5页 Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery
关键词 直肠癌 低位前切除术 J型贮袋 直接吻合 META分析 Rectal neoplasm Low anterior resection J pouch Straight anastomosis Meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Martling AL,Holm T,Rutqvist LE,et al.Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm.Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group,Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project[J].Lancet,2000,356(9224):93-96.
  • 2Lee WY,Takahashi T,Pappas T,et al.Surgical autonomic denervation results in altered colonic motility:an explanation for low anterior resection syndrome[J].Surgery,2008,143(6):778-783.
  • 3Lazorthes F,Fages P,Chiotasso P,et al.Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectum[J].Br J Surg,1986,73(2):136-138.
  • 4Parc R,Tiret E,Frileux P,et al.Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinoma[J].Br J Surg,1986,73(2):139-141.
  • 5Mortensen NJ,Ramirez JM,Takeuchi N,et al.Colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis after rectal excision for carcinoma:functional outcome[J].Br J Surg,1995,82(5):611-613.
  • 6Hida J,Yasutomi M,Fujimoto K,et al.Functional outcome after low anterior resection with low anastomosis for rectal cancer using the colonic J-pouch.Prospective randomized study for determination of optimum pouch size[J].Dis Colon Rectum,1996,39(9):986-991.
  • 7Seow-Choen F,Goh HS.Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction[J].Br J Surg,1995,82(5):608-610.
  • 8Hallbōōk O,Pāhlman L,Krog M,et al.Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection[J].Ann Surg,1996,224(1):58-65.
  • 9Huber FT,Herter B,Siewert JR.Colonic pouch vs.side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection[J].Dis Colon Rectum,1999,42(7):896-902.
  • 10Oya M,Komatsu J,Takase Y,et al.Comparison of defecatory function after colonic J-pouch anastomosis and straight anastomosis for stapled low anterior resection:results of a prospective randomized trial[J].Surg Today,2002,32(2):104-110.

同被引文献17

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部