期刊文献+

残胃癌的淋巴结转移特点及外科治疗 被引量:9

Characteristics of lymph node metastasis and surgical treatment of gastric stump cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨残胃癌的淋巴结转移特点及外科治疗效果。方法回顾性分析1994年1月至2008年1月大连医科大学附属第一医院收治的42例残胃新生癌患者(研究组)和同期收治的56例胃上部癌患者(对照组)的临床资料。采用t检验、x^2检验分析相关数据,Kaplan—Meier法和Log—rank检验分析两组患者的生存率及淋巴结转移率。结果研究组和对照组患者的胃周围第1~3组淋巴结转移率相近,转移率为43%~61%,其差异无统计学意义(x^2=0.752,0.833,0.678,P〉0.05);第7~9组淋巴结转移率分别为22%、18%、25%和46%、25%、30%,其差异有统计学意义(x^2=2.168,3.263,5.761,P〈0.05);第10~14组淋巴结转移率分别为47%、36%、31%、20%、25%和33%、34%、19%、6%、0,其差异有统计学意义(x^2=3.225,1.883,3.945,4.137,6.823,P〈0.05);第16组淋巴结转移率分别为0和23%;空肠系膜淋巴结转移率分别为27%和0。研究组和对照组患者总体5年累积生存率分别为38%和48%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(x^2=4.165,P〈0.05)。研究组和对照组根治度A、B患者的5年生存率分别为54%和57%,两者比较差异无统计学意义(x^2=0.622,P〉0.05)。结论残胃癌有其独特的淋巴结转移规律;应采取积极的外科治疗,对于改善患者预后有积极的作用。 Objective To explore the characteristics of lymph node metastasis in gastric stump cancer and the efficacy of surgical treatment. Methods The clinical data of 42 patients with gastric stump cancer (test group) and 56 patients with primary cancer in the upper stomach (control group) who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from January 1994 to January 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. All data were analyzed by t test and chi-square test. The survival of the patients and lymph node metastasis rate were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test, respectively. Results The metastasis rates of lymph nodes 1-3 of the test group and control group were similar (43%-61%), with no significant difference between the 2 groups ( x^2= 0. 752, 0. 833, 0. 678, P 〉 0.05 ). The metastasis rates of lymph nodes 7-9 of the test group and control group were 22% , 18% , 25% and 46% , 25% , 30% , respectively, and this was significantly different between the 2 groups ( x^2 = 2. 168, 3. 263, 5. 761, P 〈 0.05). The metastasis rates of lymph nodes 10-14 were 47%, 36%, 31%, 20% and 25% in the test group, which were significantly higher than 33%, 34%, 19%, 6% and zero in the control group, respectively (x^2=3. 225, 1. 883, 3. 945, 4. 137, 6. 823, P 〈 0.05 ). The metastasis rate of lymph node no. 16 was zero in the test group and 23% in the control group. The metastasis rate of jejunal mesenteric lymph nodes was 27% in the test group and zero in the control group. The accumulative 5-year survival rate of patients was 38% in the test group and 48% in the control group, and this was significantly different (x^2 =4. 165, P 〈0.05 ). The overall 5-year survival rate of patients with radical resection was not significantly different between degree A (54%) and B (57%) ( x^2 = 0. 622, P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusions Gastric stump cancer has a unique pattern in lymph node metastasis. Surgical resection is effective in improving the prognosis of patients with gastric stump cancer.
出处 《中华消化外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2010年第3期203-206,共4页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
基金 大连市科技计划项目(2009E12SF165)
关键词 胃肿瘤 残胃 淋巴结转移 外科治疗 Gastric neoplasms Gastric stump Lymph node metastasis Surgical treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Firat O,Guler A,Sozbilen M,et al.Gastric remnant cancer:an old problem with novel concerns.Langenbecks Arch Surg,2009,394(1):93-97.
  • 2城所仂.残胃の癌切除例の遠隔成績:胃癌研究会98施設613例の検討.日癌治療会誌,1982,17(8):2029-2034.
  • 3乌立晖,徐志飞,赵学维,李建秋,孙耀昌.残胃癌和残胃食管癌的手术预后分析[J].中华消化外科杂志,2009,8(5):384-385. 被引量:1
  • 4Hu X,Tian DY.Cao L,et al.Progression and prognosis of gastric stump cancer.J Surg Oncol,2009,100(6):472-476.
  • 5天野富薰,野口芳人,山本裕司,ほか.残胃のリンパ流.消化器外科,1986,9(3):281-289.
  • 6Tanigawa N,Nomura E,Lee SW.et al.Current State of Gastric Stump Carcinoma in Japan:Based on the Results of a Nationwide Survey[J/OL].World J Surg,2010[2010-03-25].http://www.apringerlink.com/content/1783q641q5577052.[published online ahead of print February 25,2010].
  • 7谷川允彦,野村栄治,馬渕秀明.残胃のが人の進行度と予後.外科治療,2006,94(3):264-268.
  • 8Sasako M,Maruyama K,Kinoshita T,et al.surgicad treatment of carcinoma of the gastric stump.Br J Stag,1991,78(7):822-824.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Shimada H, Okazumi S, Matsubara H, et al. Is the surgical stress associated with worse survival in patients with esophageal cancer? --Analysis of colon substitution for 37 patients with remnant stomach. Hepatogastroenterology,2007,54 ( 75 ) :791 - 795.
  • 2Schaefer N, Sinning C, Standop J, et al. Treatment and prognosis of gastric stump carcinoma in comparison with primary proximal gastric cancer. Am J Surg,2007,194( 1 ) :63 -67.
  • 3Sobin LH, Wittekind CH. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 6th ed. New York: Wiley-Liss,2002:65 - 68.
  • 4Chen CN, Lee WJ, Lee PH, el al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of gastric stump cancer. J Clin Gastroenteml, 1996,23 (4) :251 - 255.
  • 5Bombardieri T, Cafiero C, Fiumano F, et al. Primary carcinoma of the gastric stump. Physiopathological, diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. G Chir, 1999,20 (6/7) :285 - 288.
  • 6Ohashi M, Katai H, Fukagawa T, et al. Cancer of the gastric stump following distal gastrectomy for cancer. Br J Surg,2007,94 (1) :92 -95.
  • 7Piso P, Meyer HJ, Edris C, et al. Surgical therapy of gastric stump carcinoma--a retrospective analysis of 109 patients. Hepatogastroenterology, 1999,46 (28) :2643 - 2647.
  • 8Imada T, Rino Y, Hatori S, et al. Clinicopathologic differences between early gaslric remnant cancer and early primary gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Hepatogastroenterology, 2000,47(34) :1186 - 1188.
  • 9王猛.胃癌的手术治疗策略[J].中华消化外科杂志,2007,6(5):396-397. 被引量:9

同被引文献145

引证文献9

二级引证文献215

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部