期刊文献+

DHS和经皮加压钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效分析 被引量:5

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨髋动力螺钉(DHS)和经皮加压钢板(PCCP)治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法分析54例股骨粗隆间骨折患者,其中25例应用PCCP治疗,29例用DHS治疗。结果术后随访6~28个月。PCCP组、DHS组在手术时间、术中出血量、下地行走时间方面差异有统计学意义,骨折愈合时间及髋关节功能评分方面差异无统计学意义。结论 PCCP治疗股骨粗隆间骨折可减少手术时间、术中出血量及降低固定失败率,同时有利于患者早期下地活动,是理想的固定方式,具有较满意的临床疗效。
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2010年第6期531-532,共2页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1冯明利,沈惠良,雍宜民.影响股骨转子间骨折疗效相关因素分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2003,19(2):80-82. 被引量:71
  • 2Knobe M, Munker R, Sellei RM ,et al.Unstable pertrochantexic femur fractures. Failure rate, lag screw sliding and outcome with extra- and intramedullary devices (PCCP, DHS and PFN) .Z Orthop Unfall, 2009,147(3):306.
  • 3Krischak GD,Augat P, Beck A,et al.Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intert roehanteric osteotomy model:sliding hip screw and percutaneous compression plate. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon),2007,22(10):1112-1118.
  • 4Panesar SS, Mirza S, Bharadw aj G,et al.The percutaneous compression plate versus the dynamic hip screw:a meta-analysis.Acta Orthop Belg, 2008,74(1):38.

二级参考文献4

  • 1林则仕.加压滑动鹅头钉治疗股骨转子间骨折132例疗效分析[J]中华创伤杂志,1999(02).
  • 2Lin-Chih Hwang,Wai-Hee Lo,Wei-Ming Chen,Cheng-Fu Lin,Ching-Kuei Huang,Chun-Mu Chen. Intertrochanteric fractures in adults younger than 40 years of age[J] 2001,Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery(3):123~126
  • 3K. M. Fox,J. Magaziner,W. G. Hawkes,J. Yu-Yahiro,J. R. Hebel,S. I. Zimmerman,L. Holder,R. Michael. Loss of Bone Density and Lean Body Mass after Hip Fracture[J] 2000,Osteoporosis International(1):31~35
  • 4权日,徐国洲,尹庆水,昌耘冰,张余.股骨转子间骨折治疗分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2001,17(12):713-714. 被引量:117

共引文献70

同被引文献56

  • 1刘复安,尤元璋,袁华澄,李楠竹,游戊己.人工股骨头置换治疗高龄老年股骨粗隆间粉碎性骨折[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,2004,19(10):696-697. 被引量:46
  • 2王建辉,刘长贵,刘瑞波.PFN和DHS治疗股骨转子间骨折的生物力学研究及临床疗效观察[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,2004,19(11):739-741. 被引量:83
  • 3汪伟,王岩,崔健,韩刚.股骨近端三维几何形态重建[J].中华外科杂志,2003,41(10):744-748. 被引量:30
  • 4邱贵兴.骨质疏松性骨折——被忽视了的健康杀手[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(11):730-731. 被引量:76
  • 5Krischak GD, Augat P, Beck A, et al. Biomechanieal comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: sliding hip screw and percutaneous compression plate. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2007, 22(10): 1112-1118.
  • 6Palm H, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, et al. Integrity of the lateral femoral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures: an important predictor of a reoperation. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2007,89(3): 470-475.
  • 7Janzing HM, Houben BJ, Brandt SE, et al. The gotfried percutaneous compression plate versus the dynamic hip screw in the treatment of pertrochanteric hip fractures: minimal invasive treatment reduces op- erative time and postoperative pain. J Trauma,2002,52(2): 293-298.
  • 8Panesar SS, Mirza S, Bharadwaj G, et al. The percutaneous compres- sion plate versus the dynamic hip screw: a meta-analysis. Acta Or- thop Belg,2008,74(1): 38-48.
  • 9Knobe M, Munker R, Sellei RM, et al. Unstable pertrochanteric fe- mur fractures. Failure rate, lag screw sliding and outcome with extra and intramedullary devices (PCCP, DHS and PFN). Z Orthop Unfall, 2009,147(3): 306-313.
  • 10王满宜 杨庆铭 曾炳芳 等译.骨折治疗的AO原则[M].北京:华夏出版社,2003.221.

引证文献5

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部