期刊文献+

Influence of pH, Heat and Enzymatic Treatments on the Activity of Antibacterial Substance in MRS and Milk Media Produced by Lactobacillus fermentum F6 被引量:1

Influence of pH, Heat and Enzymatic Treatments on the Activity of Antibacterial Substance in MRS and Milk Media Produced by Lactobacillus fermentum F6
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 This study aimed to investigate the influence of pH,heat and enzymatic treatments on the activity of antibacterial substance in MRS,skim soy milk and bovine milk media fermented by a potential probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum F6.The antibacterial activity of the culture supernatant of L.fermentum F6 was tested against a wide range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus,Escherichia coli,Listeria monocytogenes,Salmonella typhimurium,and Shigella flexneri.Different antibacterial activities were detected in MRS and milk but not in soy milk.We presumed that three kinds of probable components including organic acids,heat-stable and heat-labile proteinaceous compounds were involved in antibacterial activity of fermented MRS and milk.The influence of acids on antibacterial activity was pH-dependent and this effect multiplied with thermal treatments seemed complex.Data analyses showed various significant differences of antibacterial activity among five pathogens were observed in pH and heat treatments.The untreated fermented milk showed higher inhibitory activity to Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria than Gram-negative bacteria (P 〈 0.05),indicating antibacterial substances of fermented milk are greatly different from fermented MRS.An accurate stimulated gastrointestinal transit showed antibacterial substances would have no influence on intestinal flora.Acidic range of antibacterial substances from pH 2.0 to 6.0 can be potentially used as food biopreservatives and alternative therapeutics. This study aimed to investigate the influence of pH,heat and enzymatic treatments on the activity of antibacterial substance in MRS,skim soy milk and bovine milk media fermented by a potential probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum F6.The antibacterial activity of the culture supernatant of L.fermentum F6 was tested against a wide range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus,Escherichia coli,Listeria monocytogenes,Salmonella typhimurium,and Shigella flexneri.Different antibacterial activities were detected in MRS and milk but not in soy milk.We presumed that three kinds of probable components including organic acids,heat-stable and heat-labile proteinaceous compounds were involved in antibacterial activity of fermented MRS and milk.The influence of acids on antibacterial activity was pH-dependent and this effect multiplied with thermal treatments seemed complex.Data analyses showed various significant differences of antibacterial activity among five pathogens were observed in pH and heat treatments.The untreated fermented milk showed higher inhibitory activity to Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria than Gram-negative bacteria (P 〈 0.05),indicating antibacterial substances of fermented milk are greatly different from fermented MRS.An accurate stimulated gastrointestinal transit showed antibacterial substances would have no influence on intestinal flora.Acidic range of antibacterial substances from pH 2.0 to 6.0 can be potentially used as food biopreservatives and alternative therapeutics.
出处 《Agricultural Sciences in China》 CAS CSCD 2010年第6期911-920,共10页 中国农业科学(英文版)
基金 the National Nature Science Foundation of China (30660135, 30800861) the National High-Tech R&D Program of China (863 Program, 2006AA10Z345, 2007AA10Z353) the Ear Marked Fund for Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System, China (NCET-06-0269)
关键词 Lactobacillusfermentum F6 antibacterial activity PH thermal treatments enzymatic effect Lactobacillusfermentum F6, antibacterial activity, pH, thermal treatments, enzymatic effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Abdelgadira W S,Hamadb S H,Moller P L,Jakobsen M.2001.Characterization of the dominant microbiota of Sudanese fermented milk Rob.International Dairy Journal,11,63-70.
  • 2AI-Zahrani S H,AI-Zahrani F S.2006.Production ofbacterioeins by four lactic acid bacteria isolated from raw milk on organic waste.World Applied Sciences Journal,1,135-143.
  • 3Anandaraj B,Vellaichamy A,Kachman M,Selvamanikandan A,Pegu S,Murugan V.2009.Co-production of two new peptide antibiotics by a bacterial isolate Paenibacillus alvei NP75.Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications,379,179-185.
  • 4Anthony T,Rajesh T,Kayalvizhi N,Gunasekaran P.2009.Influence of medium components and fermentation conditions on the production of bacteriocin(s) by Bacillus licheniformis AnBa9.Bioresource Technology,100,872-877.
  • 5Bao Y,Zhang Y C,Zhang Y,Liu Y,Wang S Q,Dong X M,Wang Y Y,Zhang H P.2010.Screening of potential probiotic properties of Lactobacillus fermentum isolated from traditional dairy products.Food Control,21,695-701.
  • 6Barrons R,Tassone D.2008.Use of Lactobacillus probiotics for bacterial genitourinary infections in women:a review.Clinical Therapeutics,30,453-468.
  • 7Cenci G,Trotta F,Caldini G.2006.Tolerance to challenges miming gastrointestinal transit by spores and vegetative cells of Bacillus clausii.Journal of Applied Microbiology,101,1208-1215.
  • 8Chen H,Hoover D G.2003.Baeteriocins and their food applications.Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety,2,82-100.
  • 9Diop M B,Dubois-Dauphin R,Tine E,Ngom A,Destain J,Thonart P.2007.Bacteriocin producers from traditional food products.Biotechnology,Agronomy,Society and Environment,11,275-281.
  • 10Esehenbach D A,Davick P R,Williams B L,Klebanoff S J,Young-Smith K,Critchlow C M,Holmes K K.1989.Prevalence of hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus species in normal women and women with bacterial vaginosis.Journal of Clinical Microbiology,27,251-256.

同被引文献25

  • 1Guarmer F, Schaafsma GJ. Probiotics[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 1998, 39(3): 237-238.
  • 2Aroutcheva A, Gariti D, Simon M, et al. Defense factors of vaginal lactobaeilli[J]. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2001, 185(2): 375-379.
  • 3Feng X, Eriksson ARB. Growth of lactic acid bacteria and Rhizopus oligosporus during barley tempeh fermentation [J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2005, 104(3): 249-256.
  • 4Garro MS, Valdez GF, Giogi GS. Temperature effect on the biological activity of Bifidobacterium longum CRL 849 and Lactobacillus fermentum CRL 251 in pure and mixed cultures grown in soymilk[J]. Food Microbiology, 2004, 21 (5): 511-518.
  • 5Zoumpopoulou G. Lactobacillus fermentum ACA-DC 179 displays probiotic potential in vitro and protects against trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis and Salmonella infection in murine models[J]. International Food Microbiol, 2008, 121(1) : 18-26.
  • 6Fazeli MR, Shahverdi AR, Sedaghat B, et al. Sourdough-isolated Lactobacillus fermentum as a potent anti-mould preservative of a traditional Iranian bread[J]. European Food Research and Technology, 2004, 218(6): 554-556.
  • 7Zeng XQ, Pan DD. Functional characteristics of Lactobacillus fermentum F I[J]. Current Microbiology, 2011, 31: 62-27.
  • 8Jarvenpaa S, Tahvonen RL, Ouwehand AC., et al. A probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum ME-3 has antioxidative ca- pacity in soft cheese spreads with different fats[J]. American Dairy Science Association, 2007, 90(7): 3171-3177.
  • 9Conway PL, Gorbach SL, Goldin BR. et al. Survival of lactic acid bacteria in the human stomach and adhesion to intestinal cells[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1987, 70(1): 1-12.
  • 10Charteris WP, Kelly PM, Morelli L, et al. Development and application of an in vitro methodology to determine the transit tolerance of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobaeterium species in the upper human gastroin- testinal tract[J]. Applied Microbiology, 1998, 84: 759-768.

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部