期刊文献+

不同部位肿瘤螺旋断层放射治疗校正误差分析 被引量:5

Analysis of the Corrected Error for Different Parts of the Tumor with Helical Tomotherapy
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:研究不同部位肿瘤在螺旋断层放射治疗前的校正误差。方法:选取74例不同部位肿瘤患者,其中头颈部肿瘤20例,胸部肿瘤17例,上腹部肿瘤22例,盆腔肿瘤15例。放疗前行MVCT扫描共1757次,扫描次数范围10~33次,平均每例扫描24次。结果:各部位肿瘤校正误差Z轴相对较小,<3mm误差范围在82.35%~95.99%之间。其次是X轴方向,<3mm误差范围是51.45%~74.67%。Y轴误差相对较大,误差<3mm除头颈部位是68.63%外,其它三个部位分别为41.8l%、42.47%和31.90%;而>5mm误差Y轴在盆腔部位高达47.96%;其次是腹部和胸部,分别为34.89%和30.69%,头颈部位最小,占10.64%。结论:螺旋断层放射治疗纠正了治疗误差,做到了真正意义上的精确放疗;Y轴治疗误差较大,提示制定治疗计划时特殊考虑PTV边界的外放;同时重视治疗中计划的更改和进一步提高技术员摆位的准确性。 Objective: To investigate the impact of uncorrected setup errors of helical tomotherapy for the different parts of tumors. Methods: A total of 74 patients were treated with helical tomotherapy, among which there were 20 head and neck tumors, 17 thoracic tumors, 22 upper abdominal tumors and 15 pelvic tumors. All patients received MVCT scan prior to treatment delivery. A combined total of 1757 scans were analyzed. The range of the scanning fractions was between 10 and 33. The average value was 24. Results: For different parts of tumors, the corrected error rate for the Z-axis was the smallest, with a ratio for 〈3mm of 82.35%-95.99%. For the X-axis, the ratio for 〈3mm was 51.45%-74.67%. The error rate for the Y-axis was the largest, with a ratio for 〈3mm of 68.3% for head and neck tumor. The ratios of corrected error for the other parts were 41.81%, 42.47% and 31.90%, respectively. The ratio for the Y-axis for 〉5mm on pelvic tumors was 47.96%, and the others on thoracic and abdominal tumors were 34.89% and 30.69%. The ratio for 〉5mm on head and neck tumors was only 10.64%. Conclusion: With helical tomotherapy technique, the corrected error could be used as a guide to greatly improve the precision of the treatment area by allowing the technician to correctly design the planning target volume (PTV) and then modify the plan accordingly during treatment.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第10期587-589,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
关键词 螺旋断层放疗 MVCT扫描 校正误差 Helical tomotherapy MVCT scanning Corrected error
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1McBain CA,Henry AM,Sykes I,et al.X-ray volumetric imaging in image-guided radiotherapy:the new standard in on-treatment imaging[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,64(2):625-634.
  • 2Kupelian PA,Ramsey C,Meeks SL,et al.Serial megavoltage CT imaging during external beam radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer:observations on tumor regression during treatment[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2005,63(4):1024-1028.
  • 3Welsh JS,lock M,Harari PM,et al.Clinical implementation of adaptive helical tomotherapy:A unique approach to image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy[J].Technol Cancer Res Treat,2006,5(5):465-479.
  • 4Han C,Chen YJ,Liu A,et al.Actual dose variation of parotid glands and spinal cord for nasopharyngeal cancer patients during radiotherapy[J],Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2008,70(4):1256-1262.
  • 5Ramsey CR,Langen KM,Kupelian PA,et al.A technique for adaptive image-guided helical tomotherapy for lung cancer[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,64(4):1237-1244.
  • 6Woodford C,Yartsev S,Dar AR,et al.Adaptive radiotherapy planning on decreasing gross tumor volumes as seen on megavoltage computed tomography images[J],Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2007,69(4):1316-1322.
  • 7许峰,柏森,王瑾,张洪,钟仁明,蒋晓芹.用锥形束CT图像测量放疗摆位误差[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2007,16(6):461-464. 被引量:60
  • 8Schubert LK,Westerly DC,Tome WA,et al.A comprehensive assessment by tumor site of patient setup using daily MVCT imaging from more than 3800 helical tomotherapy treatments[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2009,73(4):1260-1269.
  • 9Santanam L,Esthappan J,Mutic S,et al,Estimation of setup uncertainty using planar and MVCT imaging for gynecologic malignandes[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2008,71(5):1511-1517.
  • 10Song WY,Chiu B,Bauman GS,et al,Prostate contouring uncertainty in megavoltage computed tomography images acquired with a helical tomotherapy unit during image-guided radiation therapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,65(2):595-607.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Hurkmans CW, Remeijer P, Lebesque JV, et al. Set-up verification using portal imaging: review of current clinical practice. Radiother Oncol, 2001,58 : 105-120
  • 2van Herk M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol,2004,14:52-64
  • 3Kutcher GJ, Mageras GS, Liebel SA. Control, correction, and modeling of setup errors and organ motion. Semin Radiat Oncol,1995,5 : 134-145
  • 4van Herk M, Remeijer P, Lebesque JV. Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002,52 : 1407-1422
  • 5Matthias G, Juergen M, Dirk V, et al. Magnitude and clinical relevance relevance of translational and rotational patient setup errors : a cone-beam CT study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,5:934-942
  • 6Catherine AM, Ann MH, Jonathan S, et al. X-ray volumetric imaging in image-guided radiotherapy: the new standard in on-treatment imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006,64:625-634.
  • 7Michalski J, Purdy JA. Image-guided radiation therapy committee.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2001,51:60-65
  • 8Mackie TR, Kapatoes J, Ruchala K, et al. Image guidance for precise conformal radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003,56 : 89-105
  • 9Sidhu K, Ford EC, Spirou S, et al. Optimization of conformal thoracic radiotherapy using cone-beam CT imaging for treatment verification. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2003,55:757-767
  • 10Brock KK, Dawson LA, Sharpe MB, et al. Feasibility of a novel deformable image registration technique to facilitate classification, targeting, and monitoring of tumor and normal tissue. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006,64:1245-1254

共引文献59

同被引文献35

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部