摘要
责任社会化不是解决生态损害救济唯一路径,对于生态损害,强化环境法的预防功能固然重要,但侵权责任法的二次规范作用不可或缺。违法性不能成为环境侵权行为的构成要件,《侵权责任法》继续沿用《民法通则》环境侵权违法性标准是错误的。对于环境共同侵权行为人,原则上应负连带责任;如果行为人能够证明自己的行为对损害的作用程度较轻的话,可以按照该程度承担分割责任。
The socialization of responsibility is not the only way to remedy the ecological damage,to the ecological damage,strengthening prevention function of environmental law is important,but regulating function of the tort liability law can not be ignored.Illegality should not become the constitutions of environmental tort,it is wrong that manuscript for Tort Liability Law continue to use the general provisions of the civil law concerning the standards of the illegality of environmental torts.In principle,environmental joint tortfeasors should bear joint responsibilities;if one of the tortfeasors can prove,the harm that he caused was much slighter,they can assume responsibility according to the damage.
出处
《武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期402-407,共6页
Wuhan University Journal：Philosophy & Social Science
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(08JA820015)
2008年度江西省高校人文社科重点研究基地研究项目([2008]3号)
