摘要
在制度与公民的关系问题上存在着"有好制度才有好公民,有好公民才有好制度"的悖论,为解决这一悖论,柏拉图引入哲学王的概念,卢梭则引入立法者的概念。柏拉图和卢梭在解决上述悖论方面存在两个主要差异:在由谁来确定共同善的问题上,他们存在着唯理智主义与唯意志主义的差异;在依据什么来塑造理想国家的问题上,他们则存在着普遍主义与特殊主义的差异。最终,柏拉图和卢梭都不得不求助于神意来支撑他们的理论。
There is a paradoxical or circular nature of the relation between the institution and its citizens,which is ＂there are right citizens only if there is a right institution,while there is a right institution only if there are right citizens＂.To settle this paradox,Plato introduces the concept of Philosopher-king and Rousseau introduces the concept of legislator.There are two main differences between Plato and Rousseau on their efforts to resolve the above paradox：the first one is between rationalism and the voluntarism on the question of who will determine the general good,and the second one is between the universalism and the localism on the question of how to make an ideal country.Eventually,both Plato and Rousseau have to depend on the gods to support their theories.
出处
《求是学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期28-32,共5页
Seeking Truth
关键词
哲学王
立法者
神意
philosopher-king
legislator
Providence
