期刊文献+

长穗薄冰草(Thinopyrum ponticum)对盐碱胁迫的生理响应

Physiological Response of Thinopyrum ponticum to Salt-alkaline Stress
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 实验采用不同浓度(以于土重0.3%、0.5%、0.7%和0.9%计)Na_2SO_4、NaCl、NaHCO_3、Na_2CO_3,Na_2SO_4:NaCl=1:1、NaHCO_3:Na_2CO_3=1:1和Na_2SO_4:NaCl:NaHCO_3:Na_2CO_3=1:1:1:1对长穗薄冰草进行胁迫,研究长穗薄冰草对盐碱胁迫的生理响应。结果表明:根系活力、SOD活性随盐碱浓度的增加逐渐下降,脯氨酸含量呈上升趋势,叶绿素含量除Na_2SO_4处理组外,呈先上升后下降的趋势。其中碱性盐(NaHCO_3、Na_2CO_3、NaHCO_3:Na_2CO_3=1:1、Na_2SO_4:NaCl:NaHCO_3:Na_2CO_3=1:1:1:1)对长穗薄冰草的胁变效应较中性盐(Na_2SO_4、NaCl、Na_2SO_4:NaCl=1:1)大,以Na_2SO_4处理组对长穗薄冰草的影响最小,0.7%Na_2CO_3是长穗薄冰草正常生长的临界浓度。 The resistances of Thinopyrum ponticum to neutral and alkaline salt were studied through stress-treating with different concentration of salts as NazSO4 , NaC1, NaHCO3 and Na2CO3. Na2SO4/NaCl = 1/1, NaHCO3/Na2CO3 = 1/1 and Na2SO4/NaCl/NaHCO3/Na2 CO3 = 1/1/1/1. The results were as follows. The root activity and SOD activity showed a down trend with the increasing of salts concentration, proline contents increased and the contents of chlorophyll were increased at first and decreased subsequently at different degree with the salts concentration. The alkaline salts and their compounds showed higher stress effect than neutral salts and their compounds to Thinopyrum ponticum. Na2SO4 affected the Thinopyrum ponticum the least. When the concentration of Na2CO3 reached 0.7 % , the Thinopyrum ponticum touched its growing limit.
出处 《激光生物学报》 CAS CSCD 2010年第2期189-193,共5页 Acta Laser Biology Sinica
基金 "十一五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2007BAD56B01) 山西省科技攻关项目(20080312002-1) 山西省青年基金项目(2006021036)
关键词 长穗薄冰草 盐碱胁迫 生理响应 Thinopyrum ponticum salit-alkaline stress physiological response
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1FULLER R D,NELSON E D P,RICHARDSON C J.Reclamation of Red Mud Bauxite Residues Using Alkaline Tolerant Grasses with Organic Amendments[J].Environment Quality,1982,11 (3):533-539.
  • 2DARBYSHIRE S J.Tall Wheatgrass,Elymus Elongates Subsp[J].Ponlicus in Nova Scotia Rodera,1997,99:161-165.
  • 3ASAY K H,KNOWLES R P.The Wheatgrasses //Forages the Science of Grassland Agriculture[C].Iowa:Iowa State University Press,1985:166-176.
  • 4LAURIAULT L M,KIRKSEY R E,DONART G B,et al.Pasture and Stacker Cattle Performance on Furrow-Irrigated Alfalfa and Tall Wheatgrass Pastures,Southern High Plains,USA[J],Crop Sci,2005,45:305-315.
  • 5SMITH K F,LEE C K,BORG P T,et al.Yield,Nutritive Value,and Phenotypic Variability of Tall Wheatgrass Grown in a Non-saline Environment[J].Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture,1994,34:609-614.
  • 6VOGEL P,MOORE J.Forage Yield and Quality of Tall Wheatgrass Accessions in the USDA Germplasm Collection[J].Crop Sci,1998,38:509-512.
  • 7FIERRO A,ANGERS A,BEAUCHAMP J.Dynamics of Physical Organic Matter Fractions during De-inking Sludge Decomposition[J].Soil Sci,Soc Am J,1999,63:1013-1018.
  • 8LAURIAULT L M,KIRKSEY R E,DONART G B.Irrigation and Nitrogen Effects on Tall Wheatgrass Yield in the Southern High Plains[J].Agron J,2002,94:792-797.
  • 9LAURIAULT L M,KIRKSEY R E,VAN LEEUWEN D M.Performance of Perennial Cool-Season Forage Grasses in Diverse Soil Moisture Environments,Southern High Plains,USA[J].Crop Sci,2005,45:909-915.
  • 10陈穗云,夏光敏,陈惠民,冯素萍.小麦与高冰草(长穗偃麦草)体细胞杂种株系与其亲本幼苗抗盐性的比较[J].西北植物学报,2000,20(3):327-332. 被引量:15

二级参考文献52

共引文献137

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部