期刊文献+

教师变量对小学四年级数学成绩的影响:一个增值性研究 被引量:27

The Impact of Teacher Variables on the Fourth-Grade Math Achievement:A Value-Added Study
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以房山区42所小学的1238名四年级学生和42名数学教师为研究对象,以四年级下学期的数学测验成绩为因变量,四年级上学期的数学测验成绩作为协变量加入两水平线性模型中建立基础增值模型。在控制学生背景变量的条件下,考察教师的特征变量、教学方式和教师培训三个方面对小学生四年级数学学业成绩增长的影响。结果显示,教师的特征变量中,教师的性别、年龄、教龄和学历专业对学生学业成绩的增长无显著影响,而教师的职称和最终受教育水平则对学生学业成绩的增长有显著影响;与教学相关的变量中,是否参加过新课程培训这一变量对学生学业成绩的增长有显著影响。 The subjects of the study were 1238 fourth-grade students and 42 math teachers from 42 primary schools in Fangshan District,Beijing.The fundamental value-added model was constructed by adding the math achievement of the first semester of the fourth grade as the covariate and the counterpart of the second semester as the dependent variable in the two-level linear model.Then on the condition of controlling students' background variables,we examined the relationship between three teacher variables(i.e.teacher characteristc variables,teaching methods and teacher training) and the gain of students' achievement.The results indicates: among the characteristic variables,teachers' gender,age,the year of teaching and major had no significant effect on the achievement gain;while teachers' professional title,final educational qulification had significant effect on students' academic acheivement gain;among the teaching-related variables,whether teachers had participated in the new curriculum training had significant effect on the achievement gain.
出处 《教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期69-76,共8页 Journal of Educational Studies
基金 教育部人文社科基地2007年度重大研究项目(2007JJDXLX257) 北京市教育科学规划2006年度重点项目
关键词 教师变量 增值性评价 增值模型 数学成绩 teacher variables value-added assessment value-added model math achievement
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Sanders, W. L. Value-added assessment[J].School Administrator, 1998,24-28.
  • 2Konstantopoulos, S. Trends of school effects on student achievement: Evidence from NLS : 72, HSB : 82, and NELS : 92 [J]. Teachers College Record, 2006,108 (12) :2550-2581.
  • 3Wright, S. P. , Horn, S. P. , & Sander's, W. L. Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: implications for teacher evaluation[J]. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1997,11:57-67.
  • 4Nye, B. , Konstantopoulos, S. , & Hedges, L. V. How large are teacher effects? [J]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis ,2004, 26 (3) :237-257.
  • 5Dee, T. S. Teachers and the gender gaps in student achievement[J]. Journal of Human Resources, 2007,42 (3):528-554.
  • 6Clotfelter, C. T. , Ladd, H. F. , & Vigdor, J. L. Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effeets[J].Economics of Education Review, 2007,26:673-682.
  • 7Hanushek, E.A. The trade-off between child quantity and quality[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1992,100:84-117.
  • 8Jepsen, C. Teacher characteristics and student achievement: evidence from teacher surveys[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2005,57:302-319.
  • 9Ehrenberg, R. G. , & Brewer, D. J. Do school and teacher characteristics matter? Evidence from high school and beyond[J]. Economics of Education Review, 1994,13: 1-17.
  • 10Monk, D. H. , & King, J. A. Multilevel teacher resource effects in pupil performance in secondary mathematics and science: The case of teacher subject matter preparation[M]. In R. G. 1994.

二级参考文献41

共引文献192

同被引文献342

引证文献27

二级引证文献381

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部