期刊文献+

双腔起搏治疗肥厚型梗阻性心肌病的临床应用及血液动力学评价 被引量:7

Evaluation of hemodynamic and clinical effects of dualchamber pacemaker in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对10例肥厚型梗阻性心肌病(HOCM)患者行双腔(DDD)起搏器治疗,探讨不同AV间期的血液动力学效应,并对其长期疗效进行评价。方法经锁骨下静脉植入DDD起搏器,并同时植入Swan-Ganz导管及猪尾导管,测量不同AV间期的血液动力学指标,二维超声心动图测量超声形态学指标,并于起搏器植入后二年随访上述指标。结果所有患者临床症状及心功能明显改善,急性起搏时不同AV间期的血液动力学均有改善,而以AV间期为100ms、120ms时最明显,左室流出道内径(LVOTD)增宽,收缩期二尖瓣前向运动程度(SAM)明显改善,而起搏后1年、2年随访与起搏后即刻相比,上述指标均无显著变化。结论DDD起搏可做为药物难治性HOCM的一种有效方法。 Objective To observe the hemodynamic effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) at various AV intervals,and evaluate its long term effects in 10 patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HOCM) Methods DDD pacemaker was implanted via subclavian vein.A SwanGanz catheter and a Cordis endhole catheter were placed to measure the hemodynamic parameters,2dimensional Doppler echocardiography was performed to measure relevant parameters at various AV intervals of pacing.The abovementioned parameters were measured after one year and two years of pacing. Results The clinical symptoms and NYHA functional status of all patients were considerably improved.Hemodynamic effect was significantly improved in various AV intervals especially with 100 and 120 ms of AV intervals immediately after pacing,Left ventricular outflow tract dimension (LVOTD) increased and degree of systolic anterior movement of mitral valve (SAM) improved significantly.After 1 year and 2 years of DDD pacing,the abovementioned parameters were not significantly different as compared with that in acute postpacing period. Conclusion DDD pacing is an effective form of therapy in patients with drugresistant HOCM.
出处 《中华心律失常学杂志》 1999年第1期12-15,共4页 Chinese Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias
关键词 双腔起搏器 肥厚型 梗阻性 心肌病 血液动力学 Dualchamber pacemakerObstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathyHemodynamicsEchocardiography
  • 相关文献

同被引文献35

  • 1李一石,陈新,孙瑞龙,任自文.心脏起搏对心脏泵血功能的影响[J].中国循环杂志,1993,8(3):144-146. 被引量:18
  • 2Hassenstein P, Storch HH, Schmitz W. Results of electrical pacing in patients with hypertrophic obstruction cardiomyopathy (author' s transl) Thoraxchir Vask Chir,1975 ,23 :496-498.
  • 3Fananapazir L, Cannon RO, Tripodi D, et al. Impact of dualchamber permanent pacing in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with symptoms refractory to verapamil and betaadrenergic blocker therapy. Circulation, 1992,85:2149-2161.
  • 4Topilski I, Sherez J, Keren G, et al. Long-term effects of dualchamber pacing with periodic echocardiographic evaluation of optimal atrioventricular delay in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy > 50 years of age. Am J Cardiol, 2006, 97: 1769-1775.
  • 5Komsuoglu B ,Vural A, Agacdiken A, et al. Effect of biventricular pacing on left ventricalar outflow tract pressure gradient in a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and normal interventricular conduction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2006, 17:207-209.
  • 6[1]Hassenstein P, Storch HH, Schmitz W. Erfahrungen mit derschrittmacherdanerbehandlung bei patientn mit obstructive kardiomgopathie (Results of electrical pacing in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy) [J]. Thoraxchirurgie,1975, 23: 496-498.
  • 7[2]McDonald K, McWilliams EO, Keeffe B, et al. Functional assessment of patients treated with dual chamber pacing as a primary treatment for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [J]. Eur Heart J, 1988, 9: 893-898.
  • 8[3]Jeanrenaud X, Goy J J, Kappenberger L. Effects of dual-chamber pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy [J]. Lancet,1992, 339: 1318-1323.
  • 9Jeanrenaud X,Goy JJ, Kappenberger L. Effects of dual-chamber pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Lancet, 1992,339 : 1318-1323.
  • 10Gadler F,Linde C, Juhlin-Dannfeldt A, et al. Influence of right ventrieular pacing site on left ventrieular outflow tract obstruction in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Am Coll Cardiol J, 1996,27:1219-1224.

引证文献7

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部