期刊文献+

腹腔镜次全子宫切除术的临床应用 被引量:3

The clinical application of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜下子宫次全切除术(laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy,LSH)的临床特点及临床应用价值。方法:回顾分析本院2009年1~12月39例LSH与2008年1~12月31例开腹子宫次全切除术(abdominal supracervical hysterectomy,ASH)患者的临床资料,比较2种手术方式术中出血量、手术时间、肠功能恢复、术后下床时间及术后住院时间等情况。结果:两组术中出血量比较,差异无统计学意义;LSH组手术时间明显长于ASH组;LSH组术后肛门排气时间明显早于ASH组;LSH组术后下床时间明显早于ASH组;LSH组术后住院时间短于ASH组。两组无手术并发症发生。结论:LSH较ASH的优势明显,如果腹腔镜下操作技巧熟练,腹腔镜子宫次全切除术是一种理想的手术方式。 Objective: To explore the clinical value of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy(LSH). Methods: From January to December 2009,39 cases of LSH and 31 cases of abdominal supracervical hysterectomy (ASH) in January to December 2008 were issued in our hospital.The clinical data of the patients which included intraoperative blood loss, operation time, recovery time of bowel function, postoperative time of out-of-bed activity and postoperative hospital stay were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: No significant difference was found on the mean intraoperative blood loss between the LSH group and ASH group.The LSH group had significantly longer operation time and faster recovery of the gastrointestinal function than the ASH group.Furthermore,the LSH patients had out-of-bed activity and were discharged from hospital significantly earlier than the ASH group.No major complication occurred in either of the two groups. Conclusion: LSH shows great advantages over ASH.As long as surgeons are done with required skills in laparoscopic operation, LSH can be an ideal procedure for hysterectomy.
作者 王振文 唐微
出处 《中国当代医药》 2010年第12期24-25,共2页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 腹腔镜 子宫次全切除术 Laparoscopy Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomytopic
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1[18]Argiriadou H,Papaziogas B,Pavlidis T,et al.Tropisetron vs ondansetron for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind,placebo-controlled study.Surg Endosc,2002,16:1087-1090.
  • 2[19]Fujii Y,Saitoh Y,Tanaka H,et al.Ramosetron vs granisetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Can J Anaesth,1999,46:991-993.
  • 3[20]Agarwal A,Bose N,Gaur A,et al.Acupressure and ondansetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Can J Anaesth,2002,49:554-560.
  • 4[1]Thune A,Appelgren L,Haglind E.Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.A prospective randomised study of metoclopramide and transdermal hyoscine.Eur J Surgery,1995,161: 265-268.
  • 5[2]Wang JJ,Ho ST,Liu YH,et al.Dexamethasone reduces nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Br J Anaesth,1999,83:772-775.
  • 6[3]Konvalinka PA.Relationship of the menstrual cycle to postoperative incidence of emesis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Clin Excell Nurse Pract,1999,3:353-358.
  • 7[4]Song D,Whitten CW,White PF.Remifentanil infusion facilitates early recovery for obese outpatients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Anesth Analg,2000,90:1111-1113
  • 8[5]Wattwil M,Thorn SE,Lovqvist A,et al.Perioperative gastric emptying is not a predictor of early postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Anesth Analg,2002,95:476-479
  • 9[7]Apfel CC,Laara E,Koivuranta M,et al.A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting.Anesthesiology,1999,91:693-700.
  • 10[8]Grundmann U,Silomon M,Bach F,et al.Profile and side effects of remifentanil-based anaesthesia with desflurane or propofol for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2001,45:320-326.

共引文献14

同被引文献29

  • 1史玉林,牛菊敏,赵红,汪桂兰.腹腔镜手术治疗子宫恶性肿瘤72例临床分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(11):669-671. 被引量:23
  • 2边爱平,赵倩.腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术对卵巢内分泌功能的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2005,20(24):3272-3275. 被引量:17
  • 3Lacy AM,García Valdecasas JC,Delgado S,et al.Laparoscopy assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer:a randomised trial[J].Lancet,2002,359(9325):2224-2229.
  • 4Arkin DM,Bray F,Ferlay J,et al.Global cancer statistics[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2005,55(2):74-108.
  • 5Kelekci S, Yilmaz B, Yasar L, stromal blood supply after tubal comparison with controls [J]. 279-282 et al. Ovarian reserve and ovarian ligation by the pomeroy technique: Gynecol Endocrinol,2005,20 (5):.
  • 6Tulikangas PK, Smith T, Falcone T, et al. Gross and hist ologic characteristics of laparoscopic injuries with four diferent energys oares[J]. Fertil Steril,2011,75(4):806-810.
  • 7Hemakr-Johansen R. Techniqes for perfoming caesarean section[J].Bese pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol,2011,15(1):17-47.
  • 8Sumiada S, Tuominen J, IrjalaK, et al. Lutealfunction declines after laparoscopic sterilization by Hulka or Flips[J]. Contraception,2010,62 (4): 177-180.
  • 9Westhof C. Tubal sterilization-safe and efeetion [J]. NEJ Med, 2000,343 (24): 1724-1726.
  • 10Harlow BL, Missmer SA, Craraer DW, et al. Does tubal sterilizatio- ninfluencethe subsequentrisk ofmenorrhagia menorrhea [J]. Fertile St- eril, 2008,77(4):754-760.

引证文献3

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部