1Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Matsuoka Y, et al.Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: comparison of three - dimensional dynanic contrast - enhanced subtraction MR angiography and conventional angiography [ J ]. Radiology, 1999; 210 (3): 683-688.
2Szolar DH, Preidler KW, Steiner H, et al.Vascular complications in lumbar disc surgery: report of four cases [ J]. Neuroradiology, 1996; 38 (6): 521-525.
3Brewster DC, May AR, Darling RC, et al.Variable manifestations of vascular injury during lumbar disc surgery. [ J ]. Arch Surg,1979; 114 (9): 1026-1030.
4De Saussure RL. Vascular injury coincident to disc surgery [J]. J Neurosurg, 1959, 16(2): 222 - 228.
6Rofsky NM, Johnson G, Adelman MA, et al. Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced - dose gadolinium - enhanced MR angiography [ J ]. Radiology, 1997; 205(1): 163- 169.
7Anxionnat R, BracardS, DucrocqX, et al.Intracranial aneurysms: Clinical value of 3D digital subtraction angiography in the therapeutic decision and endovascular treatment [J]. Radiology, 2001; 218 (3): 799-808.
8Tamura M.Neovascularization in experimental retinal venous obstruction in rabbits.Jpn J Ophthalmol,2001,45:144-150.
9Modarai B,Burnand KG,Humphries J,et al.The role of neovascularization in the resolution of venous thrombus.Thromb Haemost,2005,93:801-809.
10Kubis N,Levy BI.Understanding angiogenesis:a clue for understanding vascular malformations.J Neuroradiol,2004,31:365-368.
