期刊文献+

New loop pairing criterion based on interaction and integrity considerations 被引量:2

New loop pairing criterion based on interaction and integrity considerations
原文传递
导出
摘要 Loop pairing is one of the major concerns when designing decentralized control systems for multivariable processes.Most existing pairing tools,such as the relative gain array(RGA) method,have shortcomings both in measuring interaction and in integrity issues.To evaluate the overall interaction among loops,we propose a statistics-based criterion via enumerating all possible combinations of loop statuses.Furthermore,we quantify the traditional concept of integrity to represent the extent of integrity of a decentralized control system.Thus,we propose that a pairing decision should be made by taking both factors into consideration.Two examples are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed criterion. Loop pairing is one of the major concerns when designing decentralized control systems for multivariable processes. Most existing pairing tools, such as the relative gain array (RGA) method, have shortcomings both in measuring interaction and in integrity issues. To evaluate the overall interaction among loops, we propose a statistics-based criterion via enumerating all pos- sible combinations of loop statuses. Furthermore, we quantify the traditional concept of integrity to represent the extent of integrity of a decentralized control system. Thus, we propose that a pairing decision should be made by taking both factors into consid- eration. Two examples are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed criterion.
出处 《Journal of Zhejiang University-Science C(Computers and Electronics)》 SCIE EI 2010年第5期381-393,共13页 浙江大学学报C辑(计算机与电子(英文版)
基金 supported by the National High-Tech Research and Development Program (863) of China (No.2009AA04Z154) the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.60736021)
关键词 Control structure design Decentralized control Interaction analysis Variable pairing Relative gain array Control structure design, Decentralized control, Interaction analysis, Variable pairing, Relative gain array
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Alstad, V., Skogestad, S., Trondheim, N., 2007. Null space method for selecting optimal measurement combinations as controlled variables. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46(3):846- 853. [doi: 10.1021/ie060285+].
  • 2Alstad, V., Skogestad, S., Hori, E., 2009. Optimal measurement combinations as controlled variables. J. Process Control, 19(1):138-148. [doi:10. 1016/j.jprocont.2008.01. 002].
  • 3Arkun, Y., Downs, J., 1990. A general method to calculate input-output gains and the RGA for integrating processes. Comput. Chem. Eng., 14(10):1101-1110. [doi:10.1016/00 98-1354(90)85006-V].
  • 4Bristol, E., 1966. On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control,11(1):133-134. [doi:10.1109/TAC.1966.1098266].
  • 5Bristol, E., 1978. Recent Results on Interactions in MultiVariable Process Control. AIChE Annual Meeting.
  • 6Campo, P.J., Morari, M., 1994. Achievable closed-loop propertyes of systems under decentralized control: conditions involving the steady-state gain. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 39(5):932-943. [doi:10.1109/9.284869].
  • 7Chiu, M., Arkun, Y., 1990. Decentralized control structure selection based on integrity considerations, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 29(3): 369-373. [doi:10.1021/ie00099a012].
  • 8Downs, J., Vogel, E., 1993. A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Comput. Chem. Eng., 17(3):245-255. [doi:10.1016/0098-1354(93)80018-1].
  • 9Fatehi, A., Shariati, A., 2007. Automatic Pairing of MIMO Plants Using Normalized RGA. Mediterranean Conf. on Control & Automation, p.297-302.
  • 10Gagnepain, J., Seborg, D., 1982. Analysis of process interactions with applications to multiloop control system design. Ind Eng. Chem. Fundam., 21(1):5-11. [doi:10.1021/i200 0168002].

同被引文献34

  • 1Skogestad S, Postlethwaite I. Multivariable feedback control: Analysis and design[M]. Chichester, WS, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
  • 2Stanley G, Marinogalarraga M, Mcavoy T J. Shortcut operability analysis. 1. the relative disturbance gain[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 1985, 24(4): 1181-1188.
  • 3Chang J W, Yu C C. Relative disturbance gain array[J]. AIChE Journal, 1992, 38(4): 521-534.
  • 4Skogestad S, Morari M. Effect of disturbance directions on closed-loop performance[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1987, 26(10): 2029-2035.
  • 5Huang H P, Lin F Y, Jeng J C. Control structure selection and performance assessment for disturbance rejection in MIMO processes[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(26): 9170-9178.
  • 6Kang O. New measure representing degree of controllability for disturbance rejection[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2009, 32(5): 1658-1661.
  • 7Chiu M S, Arkun Y. Decentralized control structure selection based on integrity considerations[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1990, 29(3): 369-373.
  • 8Dixon R, Pike A W. Alstom benchmark challenge II on gasifier\lk\columnbreak control[J]. IEE Proceedings - Control Theory and Applications, 2006, 153(3): 254-261.
  • 9Wu K, Lü J H, Xiang W G, et al. Decentralized PID control for ALSTOM gasifier[J]. Journal of Southeast University: Natural Science Edition, 2008, 38(4): 662-667.
  • 10Al Seyab R K, Cao Y. Nonlinear model predictive control for the ALSTOM gasifier[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2006, 16(8): 795-808.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部