摘要
为探讨经直肠闭式修补术（Block术）治疗Ⅰ／Ⅱ度直肠前突的临床应用价值，回顾分析108例Ⅰ／Ⅱ度直肠前突患者的资料，其中56例行Block术治疗（Block术组）；52例行吻合器痔上黏膜环切术（PPH）治疗（PPH组），对两种手术方法治疗直肠前突的疗效进行对比分析。结果显示，Block术组症状消除39例，症状明显改善14例，无效3例，总有效率为94．6％（53／56）PPH组症状消除12例，症状明显改善26例，无效14例，总有效率为73．1％（38／52）。Block术组总有效率明显高于PPH组，U=3．12，P〈0．05。结果表明，Block术治疗Ⅰ／Ⅱ度直肠前突疗效优于PPH。
For the objective of exploring clinical applicable value of the transrectal closed repair（Block pro- cedure） for rectocele,authors analysed retrospectively the clinical data, including 56 patients who had received Block procedure and 52 patients who had received PPH,then the curative effect of two groups were compared each other. As results, in the group subjected to Block procedure the symptoms of 39 patients disappeared,the symptoms of 14 patients were improved, 3 patients were of non-response, thus the total ef- fective rate was 94.6% （53/56） ;while in the group to PPH were 12 patients, 26 patients, 14 patients, and 73.1%（38/52） respectively;in total effective rate,the former was significantly higher than the later（ U = 3.12, P〈0.05）. Results show that Block procedure is superior to PPH in the treatment of Ⅰ/Ⅱ degree rectocele.
出处
《中国肛肠病杂志》
2010年第4期40-41,共2页
Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
