期刊文献+

尿沉渣检测分析仪联合血细胞分析仪在鉴别血尿来源中的应用 被引量:10

Clinical application in the identification of hematuria by combination of hematology analyzers and US-2020 urinary sediment analyzers
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨尿沉渣检测分析仪和血细胞分析仪联合检测在鉴定肾小球性血尿和非肾小球性血尿中的应用价值。方法利用US-2020尿沉渣检测分析仪和血细胞分析仪对81例不同来源血尿标本进行检测。结果 42例肾小球性血尿中红细胞畸形率为(81.70±9.29)%,39例非肾小球性血尿中红细胞畸形率为(19.0±12.0)%,利用红细胞形态鉴别血尿来源敏感性71.4%,特异性94.8%,诊断符合率82.7%,血细胞分析仪测定肾源性和非肾性血尿中红细胞平均体积和红细胞体积分布宽度分别为(64.00±7.98)fL,(24.90±3.98)%和(89.00±11.89)fL,(14.90±2.45)%,二者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论利用尿沉渣检测分析仪对尿中有形成分的测定和红细胞形态观察,利用血细胞分析仪测定尿红细胞相关参数等对血尿的诊断均有指导意义,二者联合应用提高了诊断符合率,可更加客观准确的鉴别血尿来源,为基层医院提供了很好的鉴别诊断策略。 Objective To explore the values of combined detection for distinguishing the glomerular hematuria from the nonglomerular hematuria by hematology analyzers and US-2020 urinary .sediment analyzers. Methods 81 Urine samples were measured by hematology analyzers and US-2020 Urinary sediment analyzers. Results In 42 pa tients with glomerular hematuria,the percentage of deformed red cells was (81.7±9.29)%. In 39 patients with non- glomerular hematuria,the percentage of deformed red cells was (19.0±12.0) %. When identification of hematuria by red cell morphology,the sensitivity was 71.4% ,the specificity was 94.8% and the accuracy was 82.7%. The average MCV and RDW of the red cells were (64.00±7.98) fL, (24.90±3.98)% and (89.0±11.89)fL, (14.90±2.45) respectively,with the difference being of statistical significance(P〈0.05). Conclusion The combined use of hema tology analyzers and US-2020 urinary sediment analyzers could improve the diagnose and make it more objective and accurate,which is the best strategy for local hospitals.
出处 《检验医学与临床》 CAS 2010年第9期823-824,共2页 Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
关键词 尿沉渣检测分析仪 血细胞分析仪 血尿 尿红细胞形态 红细胞平均体积 红细胞体积 分布宽度 鉴别 urinary sediment analysator hematology analyzer hematuria urinary red cell morphology MCV RDW identification
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献29

  • 1顾可梁.尿沉渣检查的新进展[J].临床检验杂志,2004,22(5):395-395. 被引量:40
  • 2蔡力力,丛玉隆,张桂珍.血尿中白细胞对尿红细胞容积分布曲线影响因素探讨[J].临床检验杂志,1993,11(4):210-210. 被引量:1
  • 3李惊子 谌贻璞 等.应用相差显微镜鉴别血尿的来源[J].中华内科杂志,1984,23(11):688-691.
  • 4张景红 黎磊石 等.尿沉渣多形型红细胞的发生机理及意义[J].中华内科杂志,1986,25(2):85-89.
  • 5[3]NCCLS. Urinanalysis and collection, transportation, and preservation of urine specimens; approved guideline [S]. NCCLS document GP 16 A. NCCLS, wayne, Pennsylvania, USA,1995,7~10.
  • 6[5]Kurt HP, Kampf Sc. Automation of urine sediment examination (acompanison of the sysmex UF-100 automated flow cytometer with routine manual diagnosis)[J]. Clin Chem, Lab Med 199,37(7):753~759.
  • 7[7]Langlosis MR, Delanghc JR, Steyaert SR, et al. Automated flow cytometry compared wigh an automated dipstick reader for urinalysis[J]. Clin Chem,1999,45(1):118~122.
  • 8[8]Kouri T, Kahkoner U. Malminiemik R et al. Evaluation of sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer vs chamber counting of supravitally stained specimens and conventional bacterial cultrues[J]. Am J Clin Path,1999,112:25~35.
  • 9[9]Koruri T, Fogazzi G, Gant V, et al. European urinalysis guideline scand[J]. J, Clin Lab Invest, Vol 60-supplement 2000: 231.
  • 10Hyodo T,Kumano K,Haga M,et al.Detection of glomerular and non-glomerular red blood cells by automated urinary sediment analyzer.NipponJinzoGakkaiShi,1995,37(1):35-43.

共引文献37

同被引文献70

引证文献10

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部