摘要
克里普克关于后验必然命题的论证基于"专名是严格指示词"这样一个前提,而"专名是严格指示词"只是一种模态直觉的结果,也就是说这样一个前提是先验的。这样一来,也就使得克里普克的后验必然命题具有了先验的性质。
Kripke＇s demonstration of posteriori and necessary propositions was based on such a premise that the proper names are rigid designators. Nevertheless, that the proper names are rigid designators is only a conclusion of a sort of modal intuition, that is to say, the premise is transcendental. Therefore, Kripke＇s posteriori and necessary propositions are of transcendental characteristic.
出处
《西南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期66-70,共5页
Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
后验必然命题
专名
严格指示词
先验前提
可能世界
posteriori and necessary propositions
proper name
rigid designator
transcendental premise
