期刊文献+

后凸成形骨水泥强化技术对骶骨钉固定强度的生物力学影响 被引量:1

Biomechanical effect of kyphoplasty-assisted PMMA augmentation on the sacral screw fixation strength
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的评价后凸成形骨水泥(Polymethylmethacrylate,PMMA)强化技术对骨质疏松情况下骶骨钉固定强度的生物力学影响,为骶骨钉松动选择坚强的补救技术提供依据。方法11具新鲜骶骨标本用于实验,并采用DEXA评价标本骨密度。在同一骶骨标本上,依次建立非PMMA强化和PMMA强化骶骨钉的固定模型如下,A组:单皮质椎弓根钉;B组:双皮质椎弓根钉;C组:传统PMMA强化单皮质椎弓根钉;D组:后凸成形PMMA强化椎弓根钉;E组:后凸成形PMMA强化侧翼钉。在MTS试验机上对五种骶骨钉依次进行轴向拔出测试,记录最大拔出力并比较。结果11具标本的平均骨密度为0.71±0.08g/cm2。A组的螺钉拔出力(508N)显著低于其他4种固定组(P<0.05)。B组的螺钉拔出力(685N)与E组(702N)无显著差异(P>0.05),但是,两者的拔出力均显著低于C和D组(P<0.05)。重要的是,D组(986N)的拔出力显著高于C组(846N)。结论在骨质疏松患者的骶骨固定中,双皮质骶骨椎弓根钉较单皮质具有显著的力学优势。骶骨椎弓根钉一旦发生松动,传统的和后凸成形PMMA强化技术均可成为补救手段,并且后凸成形PMMA强化骶骨椎弓根钉可获得最坚强的锚定。 Objective To evaluate the biomcchanical effect of kyphoplasty-assisted polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmented technique on the sacral screw fixation strength in osteoporotic sacrum, and guide the use of rigid salvage technique for loosened sacral pedicle screw. Methods 11 fresh osteoporotic cadaveric sacra were used in this study. Following measurement of the bone mineral density (BMD) of each specimen with dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry, two pedicle screws and three salvage techniques with PMMA augmentation were sequentially established and tested on the same sacrum as follows, Group A: unicortieal pediele screw; Group B: bicortical pediele screw; Group C: pediele screw with traditional PMMA augmented technique; Group D: pedicle screw with kyphoplasty-assisted PMMA augmentation; Group E: ala screw with kyphoplasty-assisted PMMA augmentation. Axial pull-out resistance of each screw was sequentially tested on a MTS material testing machine, and the maximum pull-out strengths were measured and compared. Results The average BMD of 11 specimens was 0.71 ±0.08 g/cm^2. Group A (508 N) exhibited significantly lower pull-out strength compared with all the other groups ( P 〈 0. 05 ). No statistical difference on pull-out strength was detected between Group B (685 N) and E (702 N) (P 〉0.05) ; however, the two techniques exhibited markedly lower pull-out strength than Group C and D ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Importantly, the pull-out strength in Group D (986 N) was obviously higher than that in Group C (846 N). Conclusion For sacral screw fixation of osteoporotic patient, bicortical pedicle screw could acquire significantly higher fixation strength than the unieortical. Once the loosening of pedicle screw occurs, the traditional and kyphoplastyassisted PMMA augmentations may serve as a suitable salvage technique. Moreover, the sacral pedicle screw with kyphoplasty-assisted PMMA augmented technique may obtain the strongest anchoring.
出处 《中国骨质疏松杂志》 CAS CSCD 2010年第4期251-255,共5页 Chinese Journal of Osteoporosis
基金 广东省科科技计划重点项目(2008B050100012)
关键词 腰骶融合 骨质疏松 骶骨钉 骨水泥强化 生物力学 Lumbosacral fusion Osteoporosis Sacral pedicle screw Polymethylmethacrylate Biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Pihlaj(a)maki H,Myllynen P,B(o)stman O.Complications of transpedicular lumbosacral fixation for non-traumatic disorders.J Bone Joint Surg (Br),1997,79(2):183-189.
  • 2Niu CC,Chen WJ,Chen LH.et al.Reduction-fixation spinal system in spondylolisthesis.Am J Orthop,1996,25(6):418-424.
  • 3Soini J,Laine T,Pohjolainen T,et al.Spondylodesis augmented by transpedicular fixation in the treatment of olisthetic and degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine.Clin Orthop Relat Res,1993,297(297):111-116.
  • 4Smith SA,Abitbol JJ,Carlson GD.et al.The effects of depth of penetration,screw orientation,and bone density on sacral screw fixation.Spine,1993,18(8):1006-1010.
  • 5Pfeifer BA,Krag MH,Johnson C.Repair of failed transpedicle screw fixation.A biomechanical study comparing polymethylmethacrylate,milled bone,and matchstick bone reconstruction.Spine,1994,19(3):350-353.
  • 6Sarzier JS,Evans AJ,Cahill DW.Increased pedicle screw pullout strength with vertebroplasty augmentation in osteoporotic spines.J Neurosurg,2002,96 (3 Suppl):309-312.
  • 7Becker S,Chavanne A,Spitaler R,et al.Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines.Eur Spine J,2008,17(11):1462-1469.
  • 8Waites MD,Mears SC,Richards AM,et al.A biomechanical comparison of lateral and posterior approaches to sacroplasty.Spine,2008,33(20):E735-738.
  • 9Ngu BB,Belkoff SM,Gelb DE,et al.A biomechanical comparison of sacral pedicle screw salvage techniques.Spine,2006,31(6):E166-168.
  • 10Yilmaz C,Atalay B,Caner H,et al.Augmentation of a loosened sacral pedicle screw with percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate injection.Spinal Disord Tech,2006,19(5):373-375.

同被引文献16

  • 1Birknes JK, White AP, Albert TJ, et al. Adult degenerative scoliosis: a review [ J ]. Neurosurgery, 2008, 63 ( 3 Suppl ): 94-103.
  • 2Zhu F, Bao HD, Yuan S, et al. Posterior second sacral alar iliac screw insertion: anatomic study in a Chinese population [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2013, 22( 7 ): 1683-1689.
  • 3O'Brien JR, Yu WD, Bhatnagar R, et al. An anatomic study of the $2 iliac technique for lumbopelvic screw placement [ J 1. Spine( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2009, 34( 12 ): E439-442.
  • 4Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain [ J ]. Lancet, 1974, 2 (7889): 1127-1131.
  • 5Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire[ J ]. Physiotherapy, 1980, 66( 8 ): 271-273.
  • 6Mulconrey DS, Bridwell KH, Flynn J, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein ( RhBMP-2 ) as a substitute for iliac crest bone graft in multilevel adult spinal deformity surgery: minimum two-year evaluation of fusion [- J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2008, 33 ( 20): 2153-2159.
  • 7Orita S, Ohtori S, Eguchi Y, et al. Radiographic evaluation of monocortical versus tricortical purchase approaches in lumbosacral fixation with sacral pedicle screws: a prospective study of ninety consecutive patients [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2010, 35(22): E1230-1237.
  • 8Koller H, Zenner J, Hempfing A, et al. Reinforcement of lumbosacral instrumentation using Sl-pedicle screws combined with S2-alar screws[ J ]. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2013, 25( 3 ): 294-314.
  • 9O'Brien JR, Yu W, Kaufman BE, et al. Biomeehanical evaluation of $2 alar-iliae screws: effect of length and quad- cortical purchase as compared with iliae fixation[ J ]. Spine( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2013, 38( 20 ): E1250-1255.
  • 10Zhuang XM, Yu BS, Zheng ZM, et al. Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanieal anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bieortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws[ J ]. Spine( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2010, 35( 19 ): E925-931.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部