期刊文献+

物理作用力对大豆分离蛋白乳化性及乳化稳定性的影响 被引量:11

Effect of Physical Force on Emulsion Activity Index and Stability of Soybean Protein Isolate
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究物理作用力对4种供试大豆分离蛋白乳化性及乳化稳定性的影响。分别采用不同浓度的NaCl、NaSCN、尿素和1,2-丙二醇处理大豆分离蛋白以改变其物理作用力。研究结果表明:随着NaCl和NaSCN浓度的增加,乳化活性指数(EAI)值均呈先降低再升高的趋势,说明静电作用力起主导作用,疏水相互作用不利于乳化性。随着NaCl和NaSCN浓度的升高,乳化稳定性(ES)值均降低,说明静电作用力起主导作用,并且比疏水相互作用力的影响强。加入尿素可使蛋白质的疏水基团暴露出来,使EAI值升高,但是加入不同浓度的尿素对乳化性的影响差别不大。EAI值随着1,2-丙二醇浓度的升高而升高,说明氢键相互作用利于乳化活性和乳化稳定性。 To under the effect of physical force on emulsion activity index(EAI) and emulsifying stability(ES) of soybean protein isolates(SPIs) obtained from different varieties of soybeans,various concentrations of NaCl,NaSCN,urea and 1,2-propylene were respetively used to treat SPI for changing its physical force.Results indicated that the increasing concentration of NaCl and NaSCN resulted in an initial increase and a following reduction of EAI of SPI.This suggests that electrostatic interaction was a dominant force and hydrophobic interaction is unfavorable to EAI of SPI.The fact that emulsifying stability was decreased with increasing concentrations of NaCl and NaSCN demonstrates that electrostatic interaction is stronger than hydrophobic interaction.The addition of urea improved the exposure of hydrophobic groups in protein and promoted the increase of EAI of SPI.However,no obvious effect of added urea at different levels on EAI was observed.Furthermore,as 1,2-propylene concentration increased,there was an increase of EAI.Therefore,hydrogen bonding interactions are beneficial to EAI and ES of SPI.
出处 《食品科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第7期71-74,共4页 Food Science
基金 湖北省重点科技专项项目(2006AA201B29) 国家"863"计划项目(2006AA10Z330)
关键词 大豆分离蛋白 静电相互作用 疏水相互作用 乳化性 乳化稳定性 soybean protein isolate electrostatic interaction hydrophobic interaction emulsion activity emulsifying stability
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1HERMANSSON A M. Methods of studying functional characteristics of vegetable proteins[J]. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 1979, 56(3): 221-227.
  • 2ELIZALDE B E, BARTHOLOMAI G B, PILOSOF A M R. The effect of pH on the relationship between hydrophilic/lipophilic characteristics and emulsification properties of soy proteins[J]. Lebe-Wissund Tech, 1996, 29(4): 334-339.
  • 3DAS K P, KINSELLA J E. pH dependent emulsifying properties of β- laetoglobulin[J]. Journal of Dispersion Science, 1989, 10: 77-102.
  • 4VOUTSINAS L P, ELAINE CHEUNG E, NAKAI S, Relationships of hydrophobicity to emulsifying properties of heat denatured proteins[J]. Jourmal of Food Science, 1983, 48: 26-32.
  • 5NAKAI S J. Structure-function relationships of food proteins with an emphasis on the importance of protein hydrophobicity[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1983, 31: 676-683.
  • 6WAGNER J R, SORGENTINI D A, ANON M C. Relation between solubility and surface hydrophobicity as an indicator of modifications during preparation processes of commercial and laboratory-prepared soy protein isolates[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2000, 48: 3159-3165.
  • 7TANG Chuanhe, YANG Xiaoquan, CHEN Zhong, et al. Physicocheraical and structural characteristics of sodium caseinate biopolymers induced by microbial transglutaminase[J]. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 2005, 29(4): 402-421.
  • 8UTSUMI S, KINSELLA J E. Forces involved in soy proteingelation: Effects of various reagents on the formation, hardness and solubility of heat-induced gels made from 7S,1 IS, and soy isolate[J]. Journal of Food Science, 1985, 50: 1278-1282.
  • 9BABAJIMOPOULOS M, DAMODARAN S, RIZVI S S H, et al. Effect of various anious on the rheological and gelling behavior of soyproteins: thermodynamicobservations[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1983, 31: 1270-1275.
  • 10黄曼,卞科.理化因子对大豆蛋白疏水性的影响[J].郑州工程学院学报,2002,23(3):5-9. 被引量:36

二级参考文献8

  • 1张龙翔 张庭芳.生化实验方法和技术[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1982.94-111.
  • 2Arun Kilara, Venkatesh R. Harwalkar. Chapter3 denaturation.In: Food Proteins: Properties and Characterization[M]. VCH publishier USA, 1996. 99-121.
  • 3IvengarR B, Ravenstein P. New aspect of subunit structure of soybean glycinin[J]. Cereal Chemisty, 1981, 58: 325-330.
  • 4Catsimpools N, Kenney J A, Meyer E W, et al. Molecular weight and amino acid composition of glycinin subunits[J].Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture, 1971, 22: 448-450.
  • 5Thanh V H, Shibasaki K. Major proteins of soybean seeds Subunit structure of beta-conglycinin[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1978, 42: 31-36.
  • 6Moil T, Utsumi S, Inabe H, et al. Differences in subunit composition of glycinin among soybean cultivars[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1981, 29: 20-23.
  • 7Maria Babajimopoulos, Srinivasan Damodaran, Syed S H Rizvi, et al. Effect of various anious on the rheological and gelling behavior of soy proteins: thermodynamic observations[J]. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 1983, 31:1270-1275.
  • 8Shigeru Utsumi, John E Kinsella. Forces involved in soy protein gelation: Effects of various reagents on the formation,hardness and solubility of heat-induced gels made from 7S,11 S, and soy isolate[J]. Journal of Food Science, 1985, 50:1278-1282.

共引文献47

同被引文献117

引证文献11

二级引证文献110

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部