期刊文献+

OECD国家生态税改革述评 被引量:4

The Commentary on OECD Country Ecology Tax Reform
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 绿色税制是指税收体系中与生态环境、自然资源利用和环境保护有关的各税税种和税目及税收优惠的总称。生态税改革正是基于此而提出的,其以改善环境为目标,税基、税率和税收收入返还方式为侧重点,以实现"双重红利"。自20世纪90年代以来,以丹麦、德国、英国和法国为代表的OECD国家进行了各自的生态税改革。其总体框架基本一致,但在具体细则方面略有差异,因而导致了税制社会接受度方面的差别。从税收效率、公平角度分析,制定合理的税率和税收收入返还方式是OECD国家在生态税改革中应解决的主要问题。 Green tax system is the general conclusion of all kinds of tax categories,items,as well as tax preferences which relates to ecology,utilization of nature resources and environment protection.Ecology tax reform was put up based on it,with the goal of improving environment,and put emphasis on tax base,tax rate,and tax rebates to realize double bonus.Since 1990s,some countries of OECD,as Demark,Germany,British,and France,all implement ecology tax reform each.Their framework of reform is generally alike,but also has some difference in details,which leads to the differences in the degree of social acceptations.At last,the author thinks the main problems in ecology tax reform of above these countries lie in to establish reasonable tax rate,and manner of tax rebates,in the perspective of tax rate and equity.
作者 刘普照
出处 《重庆社会科学》 CSSCI 2010年第3期62-69,共8页 Chongqing Social Sciences
关键词 生态税改革 双重红利 税收中性 效率 ecology tax reform double bonus tax neutral efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Pearce. The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming. The Economic Journal 101,pp.938-948.
  • 2Bovenberg, Mooij. Environmental levies and distortionary taxation. American Economic Review 84 (4), pp. 1085-1089.
  • 3Felder, Schleiniger. Environmental tax reform: efficiency and political feasibility.Ecological Economics 42 (2002), pp.107-116.
  • 4Patuelli, Nijkamp, Pels. Environmental tax reform and the double dividend: A meta-analytieal performance assessment .Ecological Economics 55(2005), pp.564-583.
  • 5Bovenberg, Ploeg. Green policies in a small open economy. Discussion paper no. 785. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
  • 6Morris, Re've'sz, Zalai, Fucsko. Integrating environmental taxes on local air pollutants with fiscal reform in Hungary: simulations with a computable general equilibrium model. Environment and Development Economics 4,pp. 537-564.
  • 7Garbaccio, Ho, M.S., Jorgenson. Controlling carbon emissions in China. Environment and development economics 4,pp.493-518.
  • 8Jorgenson, Wilcoxen. Reducing U.S.carbon emissions: an econometric general equilibrium assessment. Resource and Energy Economics 30,pp.433-439.
  • 9Goulder. Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader's guide.International Tax and Public Finance 2 (2), 157-pp.183.
  • 10司言武.环境税“双重红利”假说述评[J].经济理论与经济管理,2008,28(1):34-38. 被引量:21

二级参考文献15

  • 1武亚军.绿化中国税制若干理论与实证问题探讨[J].经济科学,2005(1):77-90. 被引量:62
  • 2A. C. Pigou. The Economics of Welfare (4^th Edition)[M] . London: Macmillan, 1932.
  • 3G. Tullock. Excess Benefit[J]. Water Resource Research, 1967, (3).
  • 4A.V. Kneese, B. T. Bower. Managing Water Quality: Economics, Eechnology and Institutions [M]. Baltimore : The John Hopkins University Press, 1968.
  • 5A. L. Nichols. Targeting Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection [M]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1984.
  • 6D. Terkla. The Efficiency Value of Effluent Tax Revenues[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1984, (11): 107-123.
  • 7D. Pearce. The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming[J]. Economic Journal, 1991, 101 (407) :938-948.
  • 8L. H. Goulder. Environmental Taxation and the Double Dividend:A Reader's Guide[J]. International Tax and Public Finance, 1995, (2): 157-183.
  • 9A. L. Bovenberg, R.A. De Mooij. Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation [J]. American Economic Review, 1994, (84): 1085-1089.
  • 10A. L. Bovenberg, L. H. Goulder. Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of Other Taxes: Genernal-Equilibrium Analyses[J]. American Economic Review, 1996, (86) : 985-1000.

共引文献20

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部