外语教学研究视角下的语块:发展与问题被引量：53

Development and Problems of Chunk Research: An FL Teaching and Acquisition Perspective

导出

摘要本文从外语教学角度评述了近几十年来语块理论和应用方面的研究。提出语块是词汇语法集合体,定义语块需考虑:(1)结构形式特征;(2)意义特征;(3)功能特征;(4)语言使用时的心理特征。对语块的界定需考虑其形式、结构、语义、语用及使用等因素。在确认语块在二语习得中优势的基础上,我们需要就语块的认知心理基础、在外语教学中的地位、在中国外语教学中的实践形式等问题展开更深入、全面的研究。研究可采用理论-实验-实践循环发展的模式。 This paper defines lexical chunks as the linguistic unit of integration of lexical and grammatical features. It suggests that three aspects need to be considered in its definition：（1） the formal and constructional features; （2） the unity meaning; （3） the syntactic and communicative functions; （4） psychological features in its usage. Starting from the previous categorization and classification, the paper suggests that the formal, structural, semantic, pragmatic and usage features need to be comprehensively considered in chunk categorization. Despite the various developments achieved, there remain many problems to be solved in chunk research in order to promote lexical teaching：（1） the cognitive and psychological basis of chunks; （2） the position of chunks in language acquisition; （3） the application of chunk teaching in FLT. The future research can adopt the theory-experiment-practice approach.

作者徐泉

机构地区华中师范大学

出处《中国外语》 CSSCI 2010年第2期75-79,109,共6页 Foreign Languages in China

基金教育部第一批高等学校特色专业建设(华中师范大学英语师范教育)项目成果之一

关键词语块教学发展问题 chunk teaching and acquisition development problems

分类号 H319.1 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献26

1Altenberg, B. & Granger, S. The grammatical and lexical patterning of "make" in native and non-native student writing[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2001(2): 173-194.
2Biber, D. A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English [J]. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2009, (14)3:275-311.
3Boers, F. Eyckmans, J ting multiword units & H. Stengers. Motiva- Rationale, mnemonic benefits, and cognitive style variables [J] E UR OSLA Yearbook, 2006(6): 169-190.
4Boers, F. & Lindstromberg, S. Cognitive linguistic applications in second or foreign language instruction: Rationale, proposals and evaluation [A]. In Gitte Kristiansen et al. (eds). Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives [C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2007.
5Conklin, K. & N. Schmitt. Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than non-formulaic language by native and normative speakers?[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2008, 29 (1): 72-90.
6Jiang, N. & Nekrasova, T. M. The Processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers[J]. The Modern Language Journal, 2007, 91(3):433-445.
7Krashen, S. & Scarcella, R. On routines and pattems in language acquisition and performance [J]. Language Learning, 1978(2):283-300.
8Lewis, M. The Lexical Approach: the State of ELT and a Way Forward [M]. England: Language Teaching Publications, 1993.
9Lewis, M. Pedagogical implications of the lexical approach[A]. In Coady, J. & Huckin, T. (eds). Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rational for Pedagogy[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
10Moon, R. Vocabulary connections: Multiword items in English[A]. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M.(eds). Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition, & Pedagogy [C]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997.