期刊文献+

当代侵权法比较研究 被引量:59

Comparative Tort Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 侵权法在两大法系中所采路径截然不同、风格各异,这一特点与具体规则模式和一般原则模式之间的现代法律理论的区别是相伴而生的。比较侵权法的焦点主要不是实体问题,而是侵权法的基本结构和模式问题。在侵权法的诸多具体制度上,两大法系远比普遍认为的那样更为相近,二者之间并没有不可逾越的障碍和差别。 The two contrasting approaches of tort law,in civil law tradition and common law tradition,parallel the distinction in modern legal theory between rule-based and principle-based models of law.The focus of interest is not on substantive issues,but rather on the basic structure and style of tort law.The Continental law of delict and English tort law are really much closer together than is commonly thought;there is no question of unbridgeable gaps and differences.
出处 《法学家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期103-127,共25页 The Jurist
关键词 一般条款VS类型化 保护范围 过错责任 严格责任 侵权法与保险 General Clause Versus Variety of Individual Torts Scope of Protection Liability for Fault Strict Liability Tort Law and Insurance
  • 相关文献

参考文献332

  • 1Pierre Catala and John Antony Weir, "Delict and Torts: A Study in Parallel", 37 Tulane L. R. (1963) .
  • 2Andre Tunc (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, (vol XI), 1971.
  • 3Frederick H. Lawson and Basil Markesinis, Tortious liability for Unintentional Harm in the Common Law and the Civil Law,(vol I), 1982.
  • 4Steven Shavell, Economic Analysis of Accident Law, 1987.
  • 5Reinhard Zimmennann, The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition, (paperback edn), 1996.
  • 6Christian von Bar, Gemeineuropaisches Deliktsrecht, (vol I), 1996.
  • 7Christian von Bar, Gemeineuropaisches Deliktsrecht, (vol Ⅱ), 1999.
  • 8English translation under the rifle The Common European Law of Torts, (vol I), 1998.
  • 9English translation under the rifle The Common European Law of Torts, (vol Ⅱ), 2000.
  • 10Genevieve Viney and Patrice Jourdain, Les conditions de la responsabilite, (2nd edn), 1998.

引证文献59

二级引证文献877

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部