期刊文献+

核电厂起火频率分析 被引量:8

Analysis of Fire Frequency in Nuclear Power Plants
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过研究美国核管理委员会(NRC)和电力研究院(EPRI)的《核电厂的火灾概率风险评价方法》,介绍了核电厂内部火灾概率安全评价(PSA)过程中,各类点火源起火频率的分析方法和步骤。以大亚湾核电厂的主变压器为例,介绍了起火频率的具体分析过程。经定量计算分析,大亚湾核电厂主变压器的起火频率是4.32×10-3/(堆.年),是反应堆堆芯损坏频率(CDF)的203倍。一旦起火,发生破坏性火灾的概率高达83%。 Based on the study on Fire Probabilistic Safety Assessment(PSA) Methodology for Nuclear Power Facilities reported by NRC and EPRI,the methodology for estimating the fire frequencies resulting from various fire sources during the process of fire PSA is introduced,and an example is demonstrated by estimating the fire frequencies of the main transformer in Daya Bay nuclear power plant,which shows its fire frequency is 4.32×10-3 per RY and this is 203 times of the core damage frequency of the reactor.It also shows that once a fire occurred on the transformer,the probability of catastrophic result would be 83%.
作者 胡小民
出处 《核动力工程》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期76-80,共5页 Nuclear Power Engineering
关键词 火灾 起火频率 概率安全评价 核电厂 Fire Fire frequency PSA Nuclear power plant
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1U.S.NRC /EPRI.Fire PRA Methodology for NuclearPower Facilities[R].NUREG/CR-6850 Vol.2.Sep.2005.
  • 2濮继龙.大亚湾核电站运行教程(下)[M].北京:原子能出版社,1998.
  • 3中国国家核安全局.HAF102.核动力厂设计安全规定[S].2004.
  • 4中国国家核安全局.HAF103.核动力厂运行安全规定[S].2004.

共引文献1

同被引文献34

  • 1Mycle Schneider, Antony Froggatt. World nuclear industry status report 2013 [R]. Paris: Mycle Schneider Consuhing, 2013:47 - 48.
  • 2Bijan Najafi, Robert P. Kassawara, Francisco Joglar-Billoch ,-et al. Historyof fire events in the U. S. commercial nuclear industry[C]. Proceedings of 10^th International Conference on Nuclear Engeering, 2002:1 -8.
  • 3R. Wachowiak, A. Lindeman. The updated fire events database : Description of content and fire event classification guid- ance[ R]. California: US Electric Power Research Institute, 2013.
  • 4M Roewekamp, W Werner, A Angner, et al. Focus on safety: The fire project[J]. NEA News, 2005,23(2): 24 -27.
  • 5Eun Jeong Cha, Bruce R Elligwood. The role of risk aversion in nuclear plant safety decisions[J]. Structural Safety, 2013, 44:28 -36.
  • 6Vinny Rubano, Kiang Zee, Joelle DeJoseph. Clarifications on treatment of VEWFDS to support NFPA 805 risk analysis, FAQ 13 - 0001[ R]. USA : Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2013.
  • 7Laurent Audouin. Special issue on PRISME-Fire safety in nuclear facilities[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2013, 62(Part A) : 79 - 79.
  • 8M H Salley, R Wachowiak. Nuclear power plant fire modeling application guide[ R]. NUREG - 1934. Washington DC : US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2011.
  • 9K Canavan, J S Hyslop. Fire probabilistic risk assessment methods enhancements[R]. NUREG/CR-6850 Supplement 1. Washington DC: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2010.
  • 10NFPA 805 -2010, Performance-based standard for fire protection for light water reactors electric generating plants[ S].

引证文献8

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部