摘要
目的:比较吉妮与爱母两种宫内节育器(IUD)的临床使用效果。方法:对自愿要求放置IUD避孕而无禁忌证的育龄妇女236例,随机分成两组,分别放置吉妮IUD(117例)和爱母IUD(119例)。结果:两种IUD2年累积带器妊娠率分别为每百妇女年0.86和2.84,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2年累积脱落率分别为每百妇女年0.85和9.57,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2年累积因症取出率分别为每百妇女年0.00和5.31,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2年累积续用率分别为每百妇女年98.29和83.19,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:吉妮与爱母两种IUD均具有较好的临床效果,其中吉妮IUD具有较好的有效性和可接受性。
Objective：To compare the clinical effects of GyneFix and MCu intrauterine devices（IUDs）.Methods：A total of 236 women of reproductive age presenting for inserting IUD and eligible for the study were recruited and randomly allocated to GyneFix IUD（n=117）and MCu IUD（n=119）groups.Results：During 24 months after the insertion of IUDs,the cumulative pregnancy rates of the two groups were 0.86 and 2.84 per 100 woman-years respectively,showing no significant difference（P0.05）;the expulsion rates were 0.85 and 9.57 per 100 woman-years respectively,showing statistically significant difference（P0.05）;and the removal rates for medical reasons were 0 and 5.31 per 100 woman-years respectively,also showing statistically significant difference（P0.05）;and the cumulative continuation rates were 98.29 and 83.19 per 100 woman-years respectively,showing statistically significant difference（P0.05）.Conclusion：These two kinds of IUDs have good clinical effects.And GyneFix IUD is more effective and acceptable.
出处
《中国计划生育学杂志》
北大核心
2010年第4期233-235,共3页
Chinese Journal of Family Planning
关键词
育龄妇女
宫内节育器
临床效果
副反应
Women of reproductive age
Intrauterine devices
Clinical effect
Side effects
