期刊文献+

三种印模材料制取模型的三维精度比较 被引量:8

Three-dimensional accuracy of plaster casts obtained using three impression materials
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的三维评价藻酸盐类、缩合硅橡胶类、聚醚橡胶类3种牙科印模材料的取模精度。方法以猴牙列为标准模型,分别采用3种印模材料制取猴上、下颌牙列各10付石膏模型,用三维照相式扫描仪扫描标准模型及石膏模型,提取石膏模型扫描图像与标准模型图像进行拟合,获取设定牙列截面体的体积并对所得数据进行统计分析,观察不同印模材料制取印模与标准模型之间三维形态偏差分布的规律。结果与标准模型扫描图像相比较,3种印模材料翻制石膏模型后扫描图像的截取体积平均变化率分别为-5.84%、-3.21%、-0.63%,藻酸盐组与缩合硅橡胶组、聚醚橡胶组截面体积差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),聚醚橡胶组与标准模型最接近,其次是缩合硅橡胶组和藻酸盐组,聚醚组(P>0.05)、缩合硅橡胶组(P>0.05)在上、下颌体积变化率无统计学差异,而藻酸盐组则有统计学差异(P<0.05)。拟合图像最大偏差出现在牙颈部与牙龈组织接触的部位。结论3种印模材料制取石膏模型与标准原型相比较体积均变小,聚醚橡胶类印模材料的取模精度要优于缩合硅橡胶类,缩合硅橡胶类要优于藻酸盐类印模材料,牙颈部与牙龈组织接触的部位取模误差较大。 Objective To evaluate the accuracy of 3 impression materials in reproductions of simian dental arches using a 3-dimensional optical digitizer.Methods Two simian dental arches were prepared as the master models.Impressions were made for stone casts using three impression materials,including alginate impression materials,C-silicone materials and Impregum-Penta polyether rubber.Five plaster replication models for each master model,as well as for each impression materials were made.The master models and the casts were digitized using a 3-dimensional optical scanner and digitizer.The images of each plaster cast and its original master model were superimposed to obtain the setting cross-section volume of the dental crown.The ratios of the plaster cast volume change and discrepancy distribution patterns were analyzed.Results Compared with the volume of the master models,the discrepancies of the plaster casts volume were-5.84%,-3.21%,and-0.63% for alginate impression materials,silicone materials and Impregum-Penta polyether rubber,respectively.The discrepancy between the master models and casts from alginate material was statistically significant(P〈0.05),but not for silicone materials or Impregum-Penta polyether rubber.Maximal deviation of image fitting was located in the cervix and the gingival areas.Conclusions The volumes of all the plaster casts from the 3 impression material are smaller than that of the master model.Impregum-Penta polyether rubber allows the most precise and silicone material the relatively accurate reproduction of the denture model,while alginate can not.The major error areas are in the dental cervix and gingival region.
出处 《南方医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期257-259,共3页 Journal of Southern Medical University
基金 国家自然科学基金(30801307)
关键词 牙科印模材料 三维光学扫描系统 三维精度 dental impression material 3D optical scanning three-dimensional accuracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Federick DR, Caputo A. Comparing the accuracy removable hydrocolloid and elastomaric impression materials[J ]. J Am Dent Assoc, 1997, 128(2): 183-8.
  • 2Glen P, McGivney AB, David B. McCracken's removable partial prosthodontics [M ]. 10th ed. St Louis: Mosby Publishing Co. Inc, 2000: 221.
  • 3Hassan AK. Dimensional accuracy of 3 silicone dental impression materials [ J -. East Mediterr Health J, 2006, 12(5): 632-6.
  • 4Hiraguchi H, Nakagawa H, Wakashima M, et al. Effect of storage period of alginate impressions following spray with disinfectant solutions on the dimensional accuracy and deformation of stone models[J ]. Dent Mater J, 2005, 24(1): 36-42.
  • 5夏勇,黄翠.3种印模材料制取活动义齿模型的三维精度比较[J].口腔医学研究,2004,20(5):514-516. 被引量:4
  • 6Shah S, Sundaram G, Bartlett D, et al. The use ofa 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess the accuracy of impression techniques[ J ]. J Dent; 2004, 32(8): 653-8.
  • 7Eriksson A, Ockert-Eriksson G, Lockowandt P. Accuracy of irreversible hydrocolloids for fixed prosthodontics [J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 1998, 106(2Pt1): 651-60.
  • 8Brosky ME, Major R J, DeLong R, et al. Evaluation of dental arch reproduction using 3D optical digitization [J ]. J Prosthet Dent, 2003, 90(5): 434-9.
  • 9Kenyon B J, Hagge MS, Leknius C, et al. Dimensional accuracy of 7 die materials[J]. J Prosthodont, 2005, 14(1): 25-31.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Federick DR, Caputo A. Comparing the accuracy removable hydrocolloid and elastomaric impression materials. J Am Dent A ssoc, 1997, 128(2)∶183-188
  • 2Chaffee NR.Dimensional Accuracy of improved dental stone and epoxy resin die materials PartⅡ:Complete areh form. J Prosthet Dent, 1997, 77∶235-238
  • 3Gien P, MeGivey Alan B. Carr. McCracken's Removable Partial Peosthodontics, 10th Edition. Mosby Publishing Co. Inc, 2000∶221
  • 4Richards MW, Zeiaei S, Bagby MD,et al, Working times and dimensional accuracy of the one-step putty wash impression technique. J Prosthodont, 1998, 7(4)∶250-254
  • 5Gordon GE, Johnson GH, Drennon DG. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastameric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent,1990,63(1)∶12-18
  • 6Heisler WH,Tjan Anthony HL. Accuracy and bond strength of reversible with irreversible hydrocolloid impression system:A comparative study.J Prosth Dent,1992,68(4)∶578-562
  • 7Wilson HJ.Impression materials.Br Dent J,1988,164∶221-5
  • 8马轩祥主编.口腔修复学.第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003∶235
  • 9白石柱,赵铱民,叶晓岚.几种常用印模材制取固定义齿模型的三维精度比较[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2001,17(3):239-242. 被引量:30
  • 10罗黎,严华华.常规法与注射法取模的比较[J].口腔医学纵横,2001,17(4):270-270. 被引量:4

共引文献3

同被引文献53

引证文献8

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部