摘要
目的探讨吻合器治疗痔疮的临床疗效。方法将住院的196例痔疮患者按就诊先后顺序随机分为对照组和观察组各98例。对照组采用外剥内扎术进行治疗;观察组采用PPH术进行治疗。结果两组患者临床疗效比较,观察组总有效率(91.8%)明显优于对照组(77.6%),具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论PPH术治疗痔疮具有安全有效、手术时间短、术后恢复快、并发症少等优势,值得推广使用。
Objective The discussion anastomat treats hemorrhoids＇ clinical curative effect. Methods Will be hospitalized 196 example hemorrhoids patient according to seeing a doctor successively order stochastic control group and observation group each 98 examples. Outside the control group uses exhausted in grips the technique to carry on the treatment; The observation group uses the PPH technique to carry on the treatment. Results Two group of patient clinical curative effect comparison, observation group total effectiveness （91.8%） surpasses the control group obviously （77.6%）, has statistics significance （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The PPH technique treats hemorrhoids to have effective, the surgery time to be short safely, after the technique, restores, the complication quickly few and so on superiority, is worth promoting the use.
出处
《当代医学》
2010年第10期96-97,共2页
Contemporary Medicine
关键词
痔疮
PPH术
外剥内扎术
疗效
Hemorrhoids
Procedure for Prolapse and Haemorrhoids
Outside exhausted in grips the technique
Curative effect
