期刊文献+

量刑建议权之理论支撑及具体设计 被引量:2

Research on the Power of Sentencing Propsal's Rational Foundation and Its Specific Design
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 检察机关量刑建议权自1999年首次试行时,便引起了理论界和实务界的广泛关注。量刑建议权的试点实践表明,设立量刑建议权具有现实的合理性,量刑建议权的设立有利于实现刑事司法公正、提高刑事诉讼效率、保障当事人人权,进而实现刑事诉讼的完整正义。同时,量刑建议权的设立具有理论上的可行性,检察机关的宪法定位、刑事诉讼规律的要求以及公诉权的应有内涵为设立检察机关量刑建议权提供了坚实的理论支撑。因此,设立检察机关量刑建议权将成为司法改革的必然趋势,量刑建议制度也应通过立法转化为我国检察制度和刑事司法制度不可或缺的组成部分。 The procuratorial organ' s power of sentencing proposal which attracted academic circles and professional circles' widespread attention has been tried out since the 1999. Those reform were slowly progressed as the reason of lacking clear regulation, the court' s low cooperative efficiency and the procuratorial organ' s different internal understandings. But the reform of the power of sentencing proposal showed that the establishment of it has realistic rationality. It is helpful to realize the criminal justice, to raise the criminal prosecution efficiency and to safeguard the litigant human rights, then to implement the criminal prosecntion's complete justice. In addition, the theoretical feasibility of the power of sentencing proposal, procuratorial organ' s constitution localization, criminal procedure' s request as well as public prosecution power' s due connotation have provided the solid theory support. Therefore, the establishment of the power of sentencing proposal will become inevitable trend of the judicial reform, and the power of sentencing proposal system would be indispensable constituent of our procuratorial system and criminal justice system through regulation. In this paper, the author puts forward specific design recommendations for the procuratorial organ' s power of sentencing proposal under the basis of its systematic analysis.
作者 王晓 任文松
出处 《徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2010年第2期128-132,共5页 Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金 中国社会科学院法学研究所王家福教授主持的国家社科基金重大项目课题:<党的领导 人民当家作主与依法治国有机统一研究>(课题号:07&ZD031)部分研究成果
关键词 检察机关 量刑建议权 检察权 公诉权 procuratorial organ power of sentencing proposal procuratorial power public prosecution power
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献15

  • 1杨兴培,王寨华.论刑事诉讼中公诉机关的量刑请求[J].法学,1999(1):39-42. 被引量:12
  • 2王志丽.量刑建议权与刑事诉讼法的完善[J].法制与社会,2008(13):18-19. 被引量:1
  • 3张杰.量刑建议制度探略[J].江苏警官学院学报,2007,22(1):67-72. 被引量:1
  • 4宋冰编.《读本:美国与德国的司法制度及司法程序》[M].中国政法大学出版社,1999年.第210页.
  • 5张雪妲.《国外量刑建议制度比较》[N].《法制日报》,2001年8月5日.
  • 6陈瑞华.刑事审判原理[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1997..
  • 7[日]田口守一 刘迪 张凌 穆津译.刑事诉讼法[M].法律出版社,2000.51.
  • 8中国政法大学刑事法律研究中心 英国大使馆文化教育处.《中英量刑问题比较研究》[M].中国政法大学出版社,2001年版.第269页.
  • 9[日]西原春夫.刑法的根基与哲学[M].上海:三联书店,1991..
  • 10陈兴良,周光权.困惑中的超越与超越中的困惑[A].刑事法评论@1998年第2卷[C].政法大学出版社,1998.

共引文献322

同被引文献45

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部