期刊文献+

一种有效处理冲突证据的组合方法 被引量:10

An Efficient Approach for Conflict Evidence Combination
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对证据理论应用过程中,冲突证据的组合问题和基本概率赋值函数难以确定的问题,提出了一种新的冲突证据的组合方法。该方法以修改模型为基础,而不改变Dempster组合规则的结构。首先,在充分考虑焦元属性之间及证据之间的相互关联性基础上,引入证据体距离函数,然后,求出系统中各证据被其他证据所支持的程度,对支持度归一化后获得各个证据的可信度,并将可信度作为证据的权重,再将平均证据代替冲突证据,最后利用Dempster组合规则实现信息融合。通过仿真实验,将该方法与现有方法进行了分析比较,结果表明应用该方法是一种有效可行的证据组合方法。 Considering the combination of conflict evidences and the difficulty in determining the Basic Probability Assignment Function (BPAF) in the application of evidence theory, a new method for conflict evidence combination is put forward. The method is based on a modified evidence model and the structure of Dempster's combination rule is not modified. First, considering the correlations between focal attributes and between evidence, a distance function between the bodies of evidence is introduced. Then, the support degree and the credibility of each evidence are obtained. The conflict evidence is superseded by average evidence. Finally, the Dempster's combination rule is used to realize information fusion. In simulations, the proposed method is compared with the existing combination methods, and the result shows that the method is an effective and feasible method for conflict evidence combination.
出处 《电光与控制》 北大核心 2010年第4期5-8,13,共5页 Electronics Optics & Control
基金 陕西省教育厅专项基金资助项目(06JK281)
关键词 证据理论 冲突证据 组合规则 信息融合 evidence theory conflict evidence combination rule information fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1SMETS P. The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model[J]. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1990,12 ( 5 ) :447-458.
  • 2SMETS P, KENNES R. The transfer belief model [ J ]. Artificial Intelligence, 1997,66 ( 3 ) : 199-234.
  • 3YAGER R R. On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules [ J ]. Information System, 1989,41 ( 2 ) : 93-137.
  • 4孙全,叶秀清,顾伟康.一种新的基于证据理论的合成公式[J].电子学报,2000,28(8):116-119. 被引量:453
  • 5张山鹰,潘泉,张洪才.一种新的证据推理组合规则[J].控制与决策,2000,15(5):540-544. 被引量:74
  • 6邓勇,施文康.一种改进的证据推理组合规则[J].上海交通大学学报,2003,37(8):1275-1278. 被引量:84
  • 7LEFEVRE E, COLOT O, VANNOORENBERGHE P. Belief function combination and conflict management[J]. Information Fusion,2002,3 (2) : 149-162.
  • 8潘泉,张山鹰,程咏梅,张洪才.证据推理的鲁棒性研究[J].自动化学报,2001,27(6):798-805. 被引量:26
  • 9HAENNI R. Are alternatives to Dempster' s rule of combination real alternative? Comments on "About the belief function combination and the conflict management problem" [J]. Information Fusion ,2002,3 (4) :237-239.
  • 10MURPHY C K. Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts[J]. Decision Support Systems ,2000,29( 1 ) :1-9.

二级参考文献45

  • 1张山鹰.证据推理及其在目标识别中的应用:学位论文[M].西北工业大学,1999..
  • 2[1]Ronald R.Yager.On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules[J].Information Sciences,1987,41:93-137.
  • 3[2]G.Shafer.A mathematical theory of evidence[M].Princeton U.P.,Princeton,1976.
  • 4[3]A.P.Dempster.Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping[J].Ann.Math.Statist.1967,38:325-339.
  • 5Dempster A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping [J]. Ann Math Statist, 1967, 38:325-339.
  • 6Shafer G. A mathematical theory of evidence [M].Princeton N J: Princeton U. P. , 1976.
  • 7Yang J B, Singh M G. An evidential reasoning approach for multiple-attributed decision making with uncertainty [J]. IEEE Trans on System, Man and Cybernetics, 1994, 24(1):1-18.
  • 8Yang J, Sen P. A general multilevel evaluation process for hybrid MADM with uncertainty [J]. IEEE Trans on System, Man and Cybernetics, 1994, 24(10) :1458- 1473.
  • 9Drukopoulos E, Hsia Y T, Smets P. Transferable belief model for decision making in the evaluation based systems [J]. IEEE Trans on System, Man and Cybernetics, 1996, 26(1):698-712.
  • 10Walley P. Measure of uncertainty in expert system[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1996, 83 (1) : 1 - 58.

共引文献640

同被引文献87

引证文献10

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部