期刊文献+

提高集束治疗依从性对感染性休克预后的影响 被引量:16

Effects of increasing compliance with medical care bundles on prognosis in patients with septic shock
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解感染性休克集束治疗依从性,以及提高依从性对预后的影响。方法前瞻性研究21307年1月至2008年6月江苏省苏北人民医院重症医学科(ICU)连续收治的成人感染性休克患者临床资料,实验分为培训前(2007年1月至21307年9月)和培训后(2007年10月至2008年6月)两个阶段,研究两个阶段感染性休克集束治疗各项指标的依从性、机械通气时间、ICU住院时间以及28d病死率。计量资料以(x±s)表示,计数资料以率表示,采用χ2检验,成组t检验,P〈0.05为差异具有统计学意义。结果研究期间共收治符合条件感染性休克患者100例,其中培训前51例,培训后49例。培训前与培训后相比,集束治疗6h的依从性分别为早期目标导向治疗(EGDT)(19.6%vs.55.1%),红细胞压积Hcr(64.7%vs.91.8%),气道内平台压(88.2%vs.95.9%),激素使用(41.2%vs.62.3%),强心药物使用(41.2%vs.65.3%),血糖控制(45.1%vs.79.6%)。同时培训前与培训后相比,集束治疗24h的依从性分别为早期目标导向治疗(35.3%vs.65.3%),红细胞压积(35.3%vs.73.5%),气道内平台压(86.3%vs.97.9%),激素使用(31.4%vs.69.4%),强心药物使用(52.9%vs.67.3%),血糖控制(47.1%vs.83.7%)。培训后机械通气时间明显缩短(P〈0.05)、ICU住院时间明显减少(P〈0.01)及28d病死率明显降低(55.1%VS.76.5%,P〈0.05),而气道内平台压和24h强心药物使用差异无统计学意义。结论感染性休克集束治疗依从性低,继续教育培训可以提高依从性,改善感染性休克患者预后。 Objective To investigate the compliance with medical care bundles in patients with septic shock and effects of increasing compliance on prognosis. Method From January 2007 to June 2008, a prospective ob- servational study of consecutive patients with septic shock admitted into ICU was carried out. The study was divided into pre-training stage (from January 2(D7 to September 2007) and post-training stage (from October 2(}07 to June 2008). The rate of compliance with medical care bundles for sepsis, the duration of mechanical ventilation, the duration of ICU stay and 28-day mortality in two stages were documented. The percentages for categorical variables and mean + SD for continuous variables were expressed. Chi-square test and unpaired t -test were used for compar- isons of groups, and statistical significance defined as P 〈 0.05. Results One hundred patients met the criteria of septic shock including 51 patients in pre-training stage and 49 patients in pest-training stage were enrolled in the study. Compared with the post-training stage, the rates of compliance with 6- hour care bundle for sepsis in pre- training stage were expressed respectively by early goal-directed resuscitation (EGDT, 19.6% vs. 55.1% ), HCY (hematocrit, 64.7% vs. 91.8%), plateau pressure (88.2% vs. 95.9%), corticostemid therapy (41.2% vs.62.3 % ), cardiotonie medication (41.2 % vs. 65.3 % ) and blood glucose control (45.1% vs. 79.6 % ). At the same time, the rates of compliance with the 24-hour cam bundle in pre-training stage in eomparisen with post- training stage were respectively expressed in EGDT (35.3 % vs. 65.3 % ), HCT (35.3 % vs. 73.5 % ), plateau pressure (86.3 % vs. 97.9 % ), eortieosteroid therapy (31.4 % vs. 69.4% ), administration of positive inotmpie medicine (52.9 % vs. 67.3 % ) and glucose eontrol (47.1% vs. 83.7 % ). Patients in post-training stage had the shorter duration of mechanical ventilation ( P 〈 0.05), shorter stay in ICU ( P 〈 0.01 ) and a lower 28-day mortality rate (55.1% vs. 76.5%, P 〈 0.05) than patients in pre-training stage. There were no significant differences in plateau pressure and eardiotonie medication between two stages. Conclusions The compliance with medical care bundles in patients with septic shock is poor. After training, physician can increase the compliance with medical care bundles for sepsis and improve prognosis.
出处 《中华急诊医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期150-153,共4页 Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
基金 江苏省“333高层次人才培养工程”基金资助(2007-58)
关键词 感染性休克 集束治疗 依从性 预后 ICU EGDT 培训 临床研究 Septis shock Sepsis bundles Compliance prognosis Intensive care unit Early goal-directed resuseitation Training Clinical study
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献50

  • 1刘大为.严重感染和感染性休克的集束治疗策略[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(17):1178-1180. 被引量:36
  • 2社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2006,29(10):651-655. 被引量:3109
  • 3邱海波.应强化和落实严重感染的早期加强治疗策略[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2007,16(2):119-120. 被引量:22
  • 4成人严重感染与感染性休克血流动力学监测与支持指南[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2007,16(2):121-126. 被引量:70
  • 5Cronin L, Cook DJ, Carlet J, et al. Corticosteroid treatment for sepsis: a critical appraisal and meta-analysis of the literature [ J ]. Crit Care Med, 1995, 23(8) : 1430-1439.
  • 6Annane D, Sebille V, Charpentier C, et al. Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock [J]. JAMA, 2002, 288(7):862-871.
  • 7Minneci PC, Deans KJ, Banks SM, et al. Meta-analysis: the effect of steroids on survival and shock during sepsis depends on the dose [ J ]. Ann Intern Med, 2004,141 ( 1 ) :47-56.
  • 8Confalonieri M, Urbino R, Potena A, et al. Hydrocortisone infusion for severe community-acquired pneumonia: a preliminary randomized study [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2005, 171(3):242-248.
  • 9Cooper MS, Stewart PM. Corticosteroid insufficiency in acutely ill patients [J]. N Engl J Med, 2003, 348(8) :727-734.
  • 10Annane D, Bellissant E, Bollaert PE, et al. Corticosteroids for severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis[ J]. BMJ, 2004, 329(7464):480.

共引文献298

同被引文献168

引证文献16

二级引证文献179

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部