期刊文献+

猪肉品质无损检测研究进展 被引量:10

Research development on nondestructive determination of pork quality
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 猪肉是我国消费量最大的肉品,其品质关系国民生活质量、营养水平及饮食安全,受到质量管理者和肉制品工业的重视.无损检测技术是猪肉品质检测和监控体系的关键技术.论文介绍了国外近10年来猪肉品质无损检测技术的研究情况,包括以肉品声学特性为基础的超声波检测,以光学特性为基础的图像和光谱检测技术,以及电子鼻、核磁共振等技术.研究表明利用上述技术可实现对活猪、猪肉胴体、猪肉脂肪组织等检测对象的一个或多个品质指标进行快速准确的检测.同时指出开展实时检测、屠宰与生产加工过程中复杂环境下的在线检测、活体品质与生长状态的检测,以及融合多种无损检测技术实施不同阶段、不同角度全面检测是猪肉品质检测的发展趋势. As the most popular meat resource in China, pork deserves great attention of quality supervision. The quality of pork plays an important role in supporting the qualified daily life, nutrition ingestion and safety of dietary. The nondestructive detection technology is a dominant means for pork quality determination and supervision system. This paper reviewed the published work concerning nondestructive detection for pork quality in foreign laboratories during last decade. The ultrasonic detection, imaging and spectral analysis, electronic noses and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technology were involved basing on the acoustic, optical or other physical-chemical characteristics of pork, respectively. The results demonstrate that the applications of technologies mentioned above are feasible and reliable in measuring the quality of live pigs, pork carcass, and pork adipose tissue. Additionally, it illustrates that the online detection and the real-time determination in complex environments of slaughtering and processing are trends of pork quality detection, as well as the detection of quality in vivo and the integration of several nondestructive detection technologies.
出处 《浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期199-206,共8页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Agriculture and Life Sciences
基金 国家高技术研究发展专项计划"863"资助项目(2007AA10Z215) 浙江省自然科学基金资助项目(Y307441)
关键词 猪肉 无损检测技术 品质检测 pork nondestructive detection technology quality detection
  • 相关文献

参考文献63

  • 1Andersen H J. What is pork quality? [A]. Quality of Meat and Fat in Pigs as Affected by Genetics and Nutrition. Zurich Switzerland: European Association for Animal Production Publication, 2000 : 12-26.
  • 2Lind L W. Consumer involvement and perceived differentiation of different kinds of pork-a Means-End Chain analysis [J]. Food Quality and Preference, 2007, 18 (4) :690-700.
  • 3McCarthy M, OReilly S, Cotter L, et al. Factors influencing consumption of pork and poultry in the Irish market[J]. Appetite, 2004,43 (1) : 19-28.
  • 4张楠,周光宏,徐幸莲.猪胴体分级技术研究进展[J].食品科学,2005,26(9):558-562. 被引量:10
  • 5NY5029-2001无公害食品猪肉[S]//中华人民共和国农业行业标准.北京:中国标准出版社,2001.
  • 6Joseph K, John K, David L. Meat Processing Improving Quality [M]. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd., 2002 : 157-174.
  • 7Coupland J N. Low intensity ultrasound [J]. Food Research International, 2004,37(6 ) : 537-543.
  • 8Fortin A, Tong A K W, Robertson W M. Evaluation of three ultrasound instruments, CVT-2, UltraFom 300 and AutoFom for predicting salable meat yield and weight of lean in the primals of pork carcasses [J]. Meat Science, 2004,68(4):537-549.
  • 9Brondum J, Egebo M, Agerskov C, et al. On-line pork carcass grading with the autofom ultrasound system [J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1998, 76(7) : 1859-1868.
  • 10Fortin A, Tong A K W, Robertson W M, et al. A novel approach to grading pork carcasses: computer vision and ultrasound [J]. Meat ,Science, 2003,63(4) :451-462.

二级参考文献27

  • 1刘丑生.猪的性状相关与非线性回归估测瘦肉率的研究[J].甘肃畜牧兽医,1997,27(2):5-9. 被引量:3
  • 2Fredeen H T. Changes in the characteristics of commercial hof carcasses in Canada[J]. Can J Anim Sci, 1984, 64: 569-586.
  • 3Kempster A J, Jones-D W, Cuthberson A. A comparison of the Danish MFA, Ulster and optical probes for use in pif carcass classification and grading[J]. Meat Science, 1979,3(2):109-120.
  • 4Kempster A J, Chadwick J P, Jones D W Cuthberson A. An evaluation of the Hennessy and Chong Fat Depth Indicator,and the Ulster Probe, for use in pif carcass classification and grading[J]. Anim-Prod, 1981, 33(3): 319-324.
  • 5Sather A P, et al. The prediction of pork carcass composition using the Hennessy Grading Probe and the Aloka SSD-210DⅫEcho Camera[J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science,1991, 71:993-1000.
  • 6Sather A P, Jones S D M, Robertson W M. The effect of genotype on predicted lean yield in heavy pig carcasses using the Hennessy grading probe, the DESTRON PG-100 and Fat-O-Meat'er electronic grading probes[J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 1995, 69: 93-101.
  • 7Kempster A J, Chadwick J P, Jones D W. An evaluation of the Hennessy grading probe and the SFK Fat-O-Meat'er for use in pig carcass classification and grading[J]. Animal Production, 1985, 40: 323-329.
  • 8Fortin A, et al. Evaluation of different ruler and ultrasonic backfat measurements as indices of comrnercial and lean yield of hog carcasses for commercial grading purpose[J]. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 61:893-905.
  • 9Kempstereses A J, Cook G L. Errors in carcass lean prediction with special reference to the EC grading scheme. New techniques in pig carcass evaluation[C]. Proceedings of the EAAP Symposium of the Commission on Pig Production,Helsinki,Finland, 1 July 1988. 1989,28-36; 7 ref.; EAAPP ublication No. 41.Wageningen, Netherlands; PUDOC.
  • 10Diestre A, Gispert M, Oliver M A. The evaluation of Automatic probes in Spain for the new scheme for pig carcass grading according to the EC regulations[J]. Animal-Production,1989, 48.

共引文献15

同被引文献211

引证文献10

二级引证文献133

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部