期刊文献+

SWAT模型参数敏感性分析与自动率定的重要性研究——以玛纳斯河径流模拟为例 被引量:35

Study on the Importance of Sensitivity Analysis and Auto-calibration of SWAT Model:Taking the case stndy of Manasi Watershed
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 介绍了SWAT2005模型参数敏感性分析和自动率定模块的原理,并在新疆玛纳斯河流域中进行应用,通过敏感性分析及参数率定前后的结果对比,证明该模块对模型应用的重要性。根据LH-OAT敏感性分析法,辨析出影响玛纳斯河流域径流模拟结果精度的主要参数因子:积雪温度滞后因子(Timp)和基流回退系数(Alpha_Bf)。根据SCE参数自动率定法,确定出对径流模拟结果影响较大的11个参数值,并采用连续5年的实测日径流数据对模型进行了验证。结果表明:模型对日流量模拟的相对误差在模型校准期和验证期均小于20%,相关系数R2高于0.8,Nash-Suttcliffe系数Ens高于0.7,SWAT模型在玛纳斯河流域产流的模拟结果良好,值得进一步推广。 This paper introduced the principle of sensitivity analysis and auto-calibration modules,and it was applied in Manasi watershed.Throngh the comparison of fore-and-aft result and the sensitivity analysis,it was proved that these modules are important for application.According to LH-OAT method,the main parameters which affected the simulated value in this watershed were the Timp and Alpha_Bf.According to SCE method,there were 11 ascertained parameters which had a significant influence on the daily runoff simulation,and the model was validated with 5 years of actual measured data.the results indicated that the relative error of the simulation results in the period of calibration and validation was under 20%,correlation coefficients R2 exceeded 0.8,Nash-suttcliffes coefficient exceeded 0.7.Therefore,the application of SWAT model in typical watershed in the Manasi was successful and reasonable,and the model deserves to be extended further.
出处 《水资源与水工程学报》 2010年第1期79-82,共4页 Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering
基金 "十一五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2007BAH12B03):"水资源与水灾害空间信息服务系统研发" 新疆水利水电工程重点学科基金资助项目
关键词 径流模拟 SWAT2005模型 敏感性分析 自动率定 run off simulation SWAT2005 model sensitivity analysis auto-calibration
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Morris M D. Factorial Sampling Plans for Preliminary Computational Experiments [J]. Technometrics, 1991, 33(2):161--174.
  • 2MCKAYM D, BECKMAN R J, CONOVER W J. A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code [J].Teehnometries, 1979, 21 (2):239-- 245.
  • 3Christiaens K, Feyen J. Use of Sensitivity and Uncertainty Measures in Distributed Hydrological Modeling with an Application to the Mike She Model[J]. Water Resources Research, 2002,38(9) : 10-- 181.
  • 4Ann van Griensven. Developments Towards Integrated Water Quality Modeling for River Basins [D] Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 2002.
  • 5Vandenberg he V, van Griensven A. and Bauwens W. Sensitivity Analysis and Calibration of the Parameters of ESWAT: Application to the River Dender[J]. Water Science and Technol,2001,43(7) ,295--301.
  • 6石河子水电局,自治区玛河管理处.玛纳斯河流域水利志[R].新疆维吾尔自治区,1992.
  • 7冯学智,李文君,史正涛,王丽红.卫星雪盖监测与玛纳斯河融雪径流模拟[J].遥感技术与应用,2000,15(1):18-21. 被引量:33
  • 8会天水水土保持科学实验站.黄土丘陵沟壑第三副区水土流失原形观测及规律研究[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,2004.
  • 9张雪松,郝芳华,杨志峰,程红光,李道峰.基于SWAT模型的中尺度流域产流产沙模拟研究[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(4):38-42. 被引量:67

二级参考文献22

  • 1Wood, E F, Sivapalan, M, Beven, K, et al. Effects of spatial variability and scale with implications to hydrologic modeling[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1988,102 : 29- 47.
  • 2Arnold, J G, R Srinivasan, R S Muttiah, et al. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment, Part I: model development [J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1988,34 (1) : 73- 89.
  • 3Neitsch, S L, J G Arnold, et al. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation[EB/OL]. Temple,Texas, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service. 2001, http://www. brc.tamus. edu/swat/swat2000doc. html.
  • 4Arnold, J G, R Srinivasan, R S Muttiah, et al. Continental scale simulation of the hydrologic balance[J]. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 1999,35(5) : 1037-1051.
  • 5Douglas, D H. Experiments to Locate Ridges and Channels to Create a New Type of Digital Elevation Models[J].Cartographica, 1986,23 (4) : 29 - 61.
  • 6Fairfield, J, P Leymarie. Drainage Networks from Grid Digital Elevation Models[J]. Water Resources Research,1991,30(6) :1681-1692.
  • 7Mark, D M. Automatic Detection of Drainage Networks from Digital Elevation Models[J]. Cartographica, 1984,21 (2/3):168-178.
  • 8Martz, L W, J Garbrecht. Numerical Definition of Drainage Network and Subcatchment Areas from Digital Elevation Models[J]. Computers and Geosciences, 1992,18(6) : 747-761.
  • 9Nash, J E, J V Suttcliffe. River Flow Forecasting Through Conceptual Models, Part I. A Discussion of Principles[J].Journal of Hydrology, 1970,10 (3) : 282-290.
  • 10Santhi, C, J G Arnold, J R Williams,et al. Validation of the SWAT Model on Large River Basin with Point and Nonpoint sources [J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2001,37 (5) : 1169- 1188.

共引文献98

同被引文献496

引证文献35

二级引证文献272

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部