期刊文献+

内涵与本质属性

Intensions and Essential Attributions
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在一种不拒绝内涵的意义理论中,内涵和本质属性应该如何得到充分而又完整的刻画呢?本文分析了弗雷格的含义-指称理论和卡尔纳普的内涵-外延理论对这个问题的回答,并指出在现今逐渐成为主流的蒙太古内涵语义,作为卡尔纳普意义理论的一个变种,并不能让内涵和本质属性得到充分而又完整的刻画。 In a kind of meaning theory that does not dodge from intensions, how to fully describe intensions and essential attributions within the meaning theory? This paper analyzes the answers for this issue from the perspective of Frege's sense - reference theory and Carnap's intension - extension theory, and then shows that a generally accepted intensional theory, that is, Montague's theory on intensionality, a variation of Carnap's theory, does not offer a fully description of intensions and essential attributions.
出处 《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期30-35,共6页 Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 湖南省哲学社会科学基金资助项目(09YBA064)
关键词 内涵 本质属性 内涵语义 模态语义 intensions essential attributions intensional semantics modal semantics
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1鞠实儿.开放类逻辑的哲学基础——一种非规范三值内涵语义理论[J].中国社会科学,2004(3):64-74. 被引量:8
  • 2Frege, Gottlob. Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence [ M]. Oxford: Blackwell. 1979.
  • 3Camap, Rudolf. Meaning and Necessity [ M]. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press,1947.
  • 4Church, Alonzo. Structure, Method, and Meaning[ M ]. New York: The Liberal Arts Press,1951.
  • 5Anderson, C. A Anthony. Alonzo Church's Contributions to Philosophy and Intensional Logic [ J ]. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic,1998, (4) :156 - 159.
  • 6Dowty R. David and Wall, E. Robert and Peters, Stanley. Introduction to Montague Semantics [ M ]. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1981.
  • 7Penelope Maekie. Transworld Identity[J/OL]. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta? (ed.). 2006. URL = < http://www, science, uva. nl/ - seop/entries/identitv - transworld/ >.

二级参考文献1

  • 1(英)卡尔·波普尔(KarlPopper)著,李本正.开放的宇宙[M]中国美术学院出版社,1999.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部