期刊文献+

SPCC钢动态摩擦与塑性变形声发射信号对比分析 被引量:1

The Comparative Analysis of Acoustic Emission Signals of Dynamic Friction and Plastic Deformation of Steel SPCC
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 金属板材在塑性加工中不可避免产生摩擦。利用声发射技术检测塑性加工的摩擦状况。以SPCC钢在单向拉伸与相对运动速度为100mm/min、正压力为7.5 kg的动态摩擦过程产生的声发射信号为研究对象,采用参数关联分析方法对两种信号进行了对比分析。试验结果表明,在相同采集的条件下有①摩擦声发射幅度与拉伸声发射幅度相差不大。②幅度相同时的摩擦声发射能量值比拉伸过程产生的声发射能量值要大得多;而摩擦声发射振铃计数值却小于拉伸声发射振铃计数值。③动态摩擦过程产生的声发射信号的持续时间在从很低到8 000μs这一范围;而拉仲过程声发射信号的持续时间一般低于5 800μs,仅当出现裂纹或断裂时才出现更高的持续时间的声发射信号。 It is inevitable to come into being friction in plastic working of metal plate. In order to detect the frictions of metal plastic deform by use of the acoustic emission technique, this paper studied the character of the acoustic emission produced in uniaxial tension and dynamic friction, the relative movement speed is 100mm/min, the stress is 7. 5kg, of the steel SPCC. These two signals were compared and analyzed by use of the analysis method of relational parameters. The experimental results showed that (at the same detecting condition) :(1) the differences of the amplitude of the AE signal produced by tensile and dynamic friction are tiny; (2) the value of energy of the AE signal produced by dynamic friction was more than the energy of the tensile test at the condition of the same amplitude, however, the ring count of the dynamic friction was less than the ring count of the tensile test; (3) the duration of acoustic emission signals in dynamic friction process was in the range from very low to the 8 00μs; while the duration was less than 5 800 μs of acoustic emission signals in tensile process, and it was only at the time close to crack or fracture that acoustic emission signals had a higher duration.
出处 《无损检测》 2010年第2期90-94,共5页 Nondestructive Testing
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50565002)
关键词 动态摩擦 塑性变形 声发射检测 参数关联分析方法 Dynamic friction Plastic deformation Acoustic emission detecting The analysis method of relational parameters
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1[1]Heiple CR, Carpenter SH. Acoustic Emission[M].Mathiews JR,ed New York:1981.
  • 2[2]Miller Ronnie K, Mclntire Paul, eds. Nondestructive Testing Handbook(Vo1. 5) Acoustic Emission Testing[M]. Second edition, Columbus: American Society for Nondestructive Testing, 1987.
  • 3[3]ASTM E1316-1996, Standard Terminology for Non destructive Examinations[S].
  • 4[4]Pollock AA. Acoustic emission distribution[A]. In ternational Advances in Nondestructive Testing (Vcl.7)[R]. 1981. 215-239.
  • 5[5]Stockbridge Scott, Hoffman Jeff. Analysis of acoustic emission data from metal pressure vessel by weighing of data attributes including MONPAC criteria [A ].Progress in Acoustic Emission Ⅶ [C]. Japan: The Japanese Society for NDI, 1994.
  • 6[1]Witehouse D J.Comparison between stylus and optical methods for measuring surface[J]. Annals of the CIRP, 1988, 37: 649-653.
  • 7[2]Dornfeld A D. Neural network sensor fusion for tool condition monitoring[J]. Annals of the CIRP, 1990, 39: 101-105.
  • 8[3]Heiple C R, Carpenter S H.Acoustic emission produced by deformation of metals and alloys a review: Part I and Part II[J]. J Acoustic Emission, 1987, 6 (3): 177-204.
  • 9[5]Suiě E, Grabec I. Application of a neural network to the estimation of surface roughness from AE signals generated by friction process[J]. Int J mach Tools Manufacture, 1995, 35 (8): 1 077-1 086.
  • 10[6]Webster J, Marinescu I, Bennett R. Acoustic emission for control and monitoring of surface integrity during grinding[J]. Annals of the CIRP, 1994, 43: 299-304.

共引文献220

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部