摘要
[目的]探讨综合护理干预方法与单纯语音干预方法治疗腭裂患儿术后语音障碍的临床效果。[方法]将腭裂术后存在语音障碍的患儿40例随机分为两组,每组20例,综合组采用综合护理干预方法,单纯组采用单纯护理干预方法。分别于干预前及干预后1个月、2个月、3个月采用"汉语语音清晰度测试字表"评价两组语音清晰度,并进行组内与组间比较。[结果]两组病人干预后语音清晰度均有改善;两组间在干预1个月后比较差异无统计学意义;在干预2个月、3个月后比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),综合组患儿语音清晰度改善情况优于单纯组。[结论]综合性护理干预模式能有效改善病人的语音障碍,提高治疗效果。
Objective： To probe into clinical effect of comprehensive nursing intervention method and simple speech sound intervention method to treat cleft palate children with postoperative voice disorders. Methods： A total of 40 cleft palate children with postoperative voice disorders were divided into two groups, 20 cases each. Patients of comprehensive intervention group were given comprehensive nursing intervention. Patients of simple group were given simple nursing intervention. Voice definitions of all patients were evaluated by adopting ＂Chinese voice definition testing words table＂ before intervention and 1 month,2 months, 3 months after intervention respectively. And the two group cases were compared statistically. Results：Voice definitions of two group patients were improved after intervention. In terms of voice definition, there was no statistical significant difference between two groups at one month after intervention. However, there were statistical significant differences in terms of voice definition between two groups at two and three months after intervention （P〈0.05）. The improvement of voice definition in comprehensive intervention group children was better than that in simple group cases. Conclusion：Comprehensive nursing intervention model could effectively improve the voice definition of voice disorder patients, and enhance treatment effect for them.
出处
《护理研究（上旬版）》
2010年第2期314-317,共4页
Chinese Nursing Researsh
关键词
腭裂
语音障碍
综合护理干预
语音清晰度
cleft palate
voice disorder
comprehensive nursing intervention
voice definition
