期刊文献+

荧光原位杂交技术对膀胱癌诊断价值的Meta分析 被引量:7

Detection of bladder cancer by FISH test: a meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对已发表的使用荧光原位杂交(FISH)技术对膀胱癌患者的诊断性试验进行系统评价,比较其是否在诊断效能上优于传统的尿液细胞学检查。方法检索相关文献,根据纳入标准筛选文献,利用Meta—DiSc软件分别计算FISH检查组和细胞学检查组灵敏度、特异度、似然比和诊断性比数比。绘制总受试者工作特征曲线,计算曲线下面积,估计总诊断精确度。结果有14篇文献被纳入,FISH检测膀胱癌总灵敏度为0.69(95%C10.66—0.73),特异度为0.84(95%C10.81~0.86),总受试者工作特征曲线的曲线下面积为0.87;细胞学检查检测膀胱癌总灵敏度为0.46(95%C10.42~0.51),特异度为0.88(95%C10.84~0.90),总受试者工作特征曲线的曲线下面积为0.81。FISH检查在总体诊断效能上与细胞学检查差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论FISH检查对膀胱癌的诊断灵敏度高于细胞学检查,但尚不能证实FISH技术检查膀胱癌对初发患者和随访患者混合构成的人群具有较高价值。 Objective To compare the diagnostic value of fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and traditional cytology in detection of bladder cancer, and to evaluate if FISH test is superior to cytologic examination in this respect. Methods The electronic database of PubMed was searched. Criteria for inclusion and exclusion into the recta-analysis were established. The studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected. Data of these studies were extracted for calculation of pooled odds ratio, likelihood ratio, sensitivity and specificity. Summary receiver operating curve and area under curve (AUC) were produced with Meta-DiSc software. Results Fourteen studies were included, and data related to cytologic examination were available in nine of them. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of FISH test were 0. 69 (95% CI 0. 66 to 0. 73) and 0. 84 (95% CI 0. 81 to 0. 86), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of cytology were 0. 46 (95% CI 0. 42 to 0. 51 ) and 0. 88 (95% CI 0. 84 to 0. 90), respectively. The AUC for FISH and cytology were 0. 87 and 0. 81, respectively. The difference in AUC between the two tests was not statistically significant ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusions Comparing with traditional cytological examination, FISH test is more sensitive. However, FISH test is still not proven to have better diagnostic value in detection of bladder cancer in both new and follow-up cases. More studies in this area are required for further evaluation.
作者 曾铮 周晓军
出处 《中华病理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期75-78,共4页 Chinese Journal of Pathology
关键词 膀胱肿瘤 原位杂交 荧光 META分析 Urinary bladder neoplasms In situ hybridization, fluorescence Meta-Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R. Pathology of tumors of the urinary bladder//Mikuz G. Clinical pathology of urologic tumors. London: Informa, 2007 : 57 -58.
  • 2Halling KC, Kipp BR. Bladder cancer detection using FISH ( UroVysion Assay). Adv Anat Patho1,2008,15 (5) :279-286.
  • 3张天嵩,钟文昭.Meta-DiSc软件在诊断试验Meta分析中的应用[J].循证医学,2008,8(2):97-100. 被引量:111
  • 4Hailing KC, King W, Sokolova IA, et ai. A comparison of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. J Urol,2000,164 (5) : 1768-1775.
  • 5Bubendorf L, Grilli B, Sauter G, et al. Multiprobe FISH for enhanced detection of bladder cancer in voided urine specimens and bladder washings. Am J Clin Pathol,2001,116( 1 ) :79-86.
  • 6Placer J, Espinet-B, Salido M, et al. Clinical utility of a multiprobe FISH assay in voided urine specimens for the detection of bladder cancer and its recurrences, compared with urinary cytology. Eur Urol, 2002,42(6) :547-552.
  • 7Skacel M, Fahmy M, Brainard JA, et al. Multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detects transitional cell carcinoma in the majority of patients with bladder cancer and atypical or negative urine cytology. J Urol,2003,169(3) :2101-2105.
  • 8Sarosdy MF, Schellhammer P, Bokinsky G, et al. Clinical evaluation of a multi-target fluorescent in situ hybridization assay for detection of bladder cancer. J Urol,2002,168 (5) : 1950-1954.
  • 9Mian C, Iz)dde M, Comploj E, et al. Liquid-based cytology as a tool for the performance of uCyt + and Urovysion Muhicolour-FISH in the detection of urothelial carcinoma. Cytopathology,2003,14 (6) :338-342.
  • 10Friedrich MG, Toma MI, Hellstern A, et al. Comparison of muhitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization in urine with other noninvasive tests for detecting bladder cancer. BJU Int, 2003,92 (9) :911-914.

二级参考文献6

  • 1Thomson R.McElroy H.Sudlow M.Guidelines on anticoagulant treatment in atrial fibrillation in Great Britain:Variation incontent and implications for treatment [J].BMJ.1998,316:509-513.
  • 2Zamora J,Abriara V,Muriel A,et al.Meta-Disc:A software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data[J].BMC Med Res Methodol,2006,6:31.
  • 3U.de Bioestadistica-Software:Mcta-DiSc.http://www.hrc.es/investigacion/metadise_en.htm.
  • 4Pai M,Flores LL,Hubard A,et al.Nucleic acid amplification tests in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].BMC Infect Dis,2004,4:6.
  • 5Cisbert J.Abraira V.Accuracy of helicoacter pylori diagnostic tests in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Am J Gastroenterol,2006,101:848-863.
  • 6Goodacre S.Sutton AJ.Sampson FC.Meta-analysiss:The value of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis[J].Ann Intern Med,2005,143:129-139.

共引文献110

同被引文献71

引证文献7

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部