摘要
2009年《美国清洁能源安全法案》是目前世界上唯一一个规定拟对相关外国进口产品采取边境碳调节措施的国内法案,将对国际贸易和气候变化政策产生重大影响。这一措施在WTO法上的合法性难以成立,它对全球气候变化谈判和正常贸易秩序的维护都有损而无益。在"后京都议定书"国际环境协定的谈判中,我国应坚持"共同但有区别的责任"原则,反对一些西方大国要求发展中国家承担高水平强制性减排义务的企图,防范未来的国际协定为类似措施打开后门。
The 2009 American Clean Energy and Security Bill, as the first and only domestic bill in the world which provides for the application of border carbon adjustment measures on imported goods, is to have major repercussions for international trade and climate change discussions. However, it＇ s almost impossible to establish the legality of such measures under the law of the WTO, and they will be worse than useless either to the global climate negotiation or to the maintenance of normal international trade relations. China should stick to the principle of ＇ common hut differentiated responsibilities＇ in post - Kyoto negotiation for a new international trade agreement, resisting the demand that developing countries should accept binding obligations concerning greenhouse gases emission reduction, and forestoring the possibil- ity for such measures in any future international agreement.
出处
《中国软科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第1期1-9,101,共10页
China Soft Science
基金
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(08SFB3036):"‘中国环境威胁论’的国际法分析和对策研究"
关键词
气候变化
边境碳调节
世界贸易组织
共同但有区别的责任
climate change
border carbon adjustment
world trade organization
common but differentiated responsibilities
