期刊文献+

简约主义下的there be结构格辩 被引量:1

On Case of there be Construction in Minimalism
原文传递
导出
摘要 生成therebe结构以词汇矩阵LA中包含there为前提,be是个非宾动词,不能核查副主语DP的格特征。LF缀词分析法、部分格分析法和一致操作分析法都把DP看成有格特征核查要求的题元,there没有可以核查的格特征,因而都不能解释there和DP的格核查。本文认为,通过与Pr合并,DP成为小句的谓词,其固有格特征渗透到[Spec,PrP]位置的there,使there具有格特征,该特征随后通过一致操作被T核查或赋值。 Derivation of there be construction presupposes there in LA, and be is an unaccusative verb unable to check the case feature of the associate DP. LF affix analysis, Partitive Case analysis and Agree analysis all treat DP as an argument having case features to be checked, and believe there have no case feature to be checked, hence they are unable to account for case checking of DP and there. This article assumes merging with Pr, DP becomes predicate of SC, percolation of the inherent case feature of the associate to there in [Spec, PrP] makes there case-marked; this case feature is checked or valued by T through Agree afterwards.
作者 南潮
机构地区 中南大学
出处 《中国外语》 CSSCI 2010年第1期32-37,共6页 Foreign Languages in China
基金 湖北师范学院资助项目:生成语法与非及物性句式研究2006D04的研究成果
关键词 therebe结构 特征核查 格的渗透 there be construction case feature checking case percolation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献37

  • 1Milsark, G.L. 1974. Existential sentences in English. Ph.D. diss., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
  • 2Moro, A. 1997. The Raising of Predicates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 3Moro, A.2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • 4Moro, A.2004. Existential sentences and expletive there. Ms.
  • 5Perlmutter, D. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 4,157-89, University of California, Berkeley.
  • 6Pollard, C. and I. Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 7Rothstein, S. 1983. The Syntactic Forms of Predication. Ph.D. diss., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
  • 8Rothstein, S.2001. Predicates and Their Subjects. Kluwer: Dordtecht.
  • 9Vikner. S. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in Germanic Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
  • 10Ward, G. and B. Bimer. 1995. Definiteness and the English existential. Language 71:722-42.

共引文献152

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部