期刊文献+

农户多目标种植决策模型与目标权重的估计 被引量:107

A Multi-objective Decision Model of Farmers' Crop Production
原文传递
导出
摘要 农户的农业生产决策过程实际上是基于多目标的,除了传统的利润最大化目标外,还考虑诸如规避风险、减少家庭劳动力投入等目标。在农户多目标决策研究中,各目标权重的估计是一个难点,已有的研究一般采用目标规划方法对权重进行估计。本文提出一阶条件校准这一新的估计法,利用实际农户抽样数据,分别对所有农户以及两种不同类型农户的各目标权重进行了估计。研究结果表明,一阶条件校准法的估计结果显著优于目标规划方法;农户对各目标的重视程度依次为利润最大化、减少家庭劳动力投入和规避风险;以农业为主的农户更加偏重利润和风险目标,而以非农业为主的农户更加重视减少家庭劳动力目标;农户的目标权重随时间而调整,随着非农就业的发展,劳动力目标权重有所增加,而其他目标权重有所减少。 Farmers' production decision is based on multiple objectives, including profit maximization, risk minimization, and saving family labor input. Appropriate estimation of weights for multiple objectives is challenge. The conventional approach to estimate the weights often follows Goal Programming, GP. In this paper a new approach, an Adjusted measure based on the First- Order Condition, AFOC, is developed. Based on primary household survey data, we estimate the weights for representative (or average) farmer as well as two different clustered representative farmers. Simulation results demonstrate that the multi-objective decision model based on AFOC estimation performs better than the one based on GP. The estimated weights show that profit is farmer's first objective, which is tbllowed by saving family labor input and then risk aversion. Farmers with more income from crop sector have higher weights for profit and risk aversion than the other farmers with less income from crops. The weights for objectives change over time. As the off-farm participation rose, the weight for family labor input has been increasing, while others have been falling.
作者 刘莹 黄季焜
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第1期148-157,160,共11页 Economic Research Journal
基金 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KSCX2-YW-N-039 KSCX1-YW-09-04)的资助
关键词 多目标 决策模型 农作物生产 权重 Multi-objective Decision Model Crop Production Weights
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1刘莹,黄季焜,王金霞.线性规划方法中存在的加总偏误问题——以农户生产决策模型为例[J].农业技术经济,2007(5):10-14. 被引量:8
  • 2张林秀.农户经济学基本理论概述[J].农业技术经济,1996(3):24-30. 被引量:47
  • 3Amador, F., J. M. Sumpsi, C. Romero, 1998, "A Non-interactive Methodology to Assess Farmers' Utility Functions: An Application to Large Farms in Andalusia", Spain European Review of Agricultural Economics 25( 1 ): 92--102.
  • 4Amir, I. and F. M, Fisher, 2000, "Response of Near-optimal Agricultural Production to Water Policies", Agricultural Systems 64(2): 115--130.
  • 5Amir, I. and F. M. Fisher, 1999, "Analyzing Agricuhural Demand for Water with an Optimizing Model', Agricultural Systems 61 (12): 45--56.
  • 6Arriaza, M. and J. A. Gomez-Limon, 2003, "Comparative Performance of Selected Mathematical Programming Models", Agricultural Systems 77(2) : 155--171.
  • 7Bartolini, F., G. M. Bazzani, V. Gallerani, M. Raggi, D. Viaggi, 2007, "The Impact of Water and Agriculture Policy Scenarios on Irrigated Farming Systems in Italy: An Analysis Based on Farm Level Multi-attribute Linear Programming Models", Agricultural Systems 93 (1--3) : 90--114.
  • 8Bazzani, G. M., 2005, "A Decision Support for an Integrated Multi-scale Analysis of Irrigation: DSIRR", Journal of Environmental Management 77(4) : 301--314.
  • 9Bazzani, G. M., S. Di Pasquale, V. Gallerani, S. Morganti, M. Raggi, D. Viaggi, 2005, "The Sustainability of Irrigated Agricultural Systems under the Water Framework Directive: first results", Environmental Modelling & Software 20(2) : 165--175.
  • 10Berbel, J. and J. A. Gomez-Limon, 2000, "The Impact of Water-pricing Policy in Spain: An Analysis of Three Irrigated Areas", Agricultural Water Management 43(2) : 219--238.

二级参考文献22

  • 1张林秀.农户经济学基本理论概述[J].农业技术经济,1996(3):24-30. 被引量:47
  • 2Buckwell,A. E. , Hazell,P. B. R. , implications of aggregation bias for the construction of static and dynamic linear programming supply models, Journal of Agricultural Economics 23,1972,119 - 134
  • 3Berbel ,J. , Rodriguez-Ocana, A. , An MCDM approach to production analysis:An application to irrigated farms in Southern Spain, European Journal of Operational Research 107 ( 1 ), 1998,108 - 118
  • 4Bazzani, G. M. , A decision support for an integrated multi-scale analysis of irrigation: DSIRR, Journal of Environmental Management 77 (4) ,2005b,301 -314
  • 5Jansen, H. G. P. , Stoorvogel, J. J. , Quantification of aggregation bias in regional agricultural land use models : application to Guacimo county, Costa Rica, Agricultural Systems 58 ( 3 ), 2005b ,417 - 439
  • 6Sheehy, S. J. , McAlexander, R. H. , Selection of representative benchmark farms for supply estimation, Journal of Farm Economics 47 (3), 1965,681 - 695
  • 7Day, R. H. , On Aggregating Linear Programming Models of Production ,Journal of Farm Economics 45 (4), 1963,797 - 813
  • 8Feinerman, E. , Finkelshtain, I. , Introducing socioeconomic characteristics into production analysis under risk, Agricultural Economics 13 (3) ,1996,149 - 161
  • 9Gomez-Limona,J. A. , Riesgo, L. ,Irrigation water pricing: differential impacts on irrigated farms, Agricultural Economics 31,2004,47 - 66
  • 10Kostov, P. , McErlean, S. , Using the mixtures-of-distributions technique for the classification of farms into representative farms,Agricultural Systems 88,2006,528 - 537

共引文献53

同被引文献1943

引证文献107

二级引证文献2224

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部