摘要
关于学庸研究方面的某些基本问题至今聚讼纷纭。采取"二重证据法"的研究方法,即通过详细地辑录二书文本引诗用诗的"文本材料",并与郭店楚简和上博简文等新出土的"地下材料"相互释证,证实二者均惯用"诗云"或"子曰"的引语样式,而到了孟、荀则改用"孔子曰"的通常写法,文字习惯的演变轨迹,可证学庸有血脉关系。另外二书引诗论诗的在文本内涵上有固定化的趋向;语气与风格类似;在运思方法上,也有极强的脉络性;特别是学庸引诗论诗均注意挖掘"诗"文本背后潜藏的象征因素与抽象含义,注重发挥"诗"中所蕴有的"心性"成分,这与后世笃守古义的训诂考证之学迥然不同,具有重要的思想史意义。
The complexity of their studies on The Great Learning and the Doctrine of the Means till leave many puzzles unsolved. By using the way of double proof, we will do our best to combine the unearthed literature with literature handed down from ancient tunes. Quotative poems and materials of the above,confirmed that the two are dubbed ＂a poem that goes＂ or ＂Confucius＂ in quotation style, but to the Mencius and Xunzi were replaced by ＂Confucius said＂, the usual writing habits and the evolution path,as evidenced by a blood relationship between them. Another two books of poetry quoted poetics have a fixed meaning in the text of the trend~ tone and style is similar; in transport thinking methods, there are also strong context-sensitive; and more forcefully highlights the holistic cultural sentiment and spiritual visage of the viewpoint of Zisi-Mencius＇ Confucian. They also have strong cultural significance.
出处
《孝感学院学报》
2010年第1期77-82,共6页
JOURNAL OF XIAOGAN UNIVERSITY
关键词
《大学》
《中庸》
引诗
用诗
先秦儒家
血脉关联
the Great Learning
the Doctrine of the Mean
quotative poems
use poems
Pre-Qin Confucian
the close relation
