期刊文献+

显微内窥镜下改良工作通道单侧入路双侧减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症 被引量:6

Treatment of degenerative lumbar spine stenosis by modified unilateral approach for bilateral decompression under microendoscope
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨显微内窥镜下应用改良工作通道单侧入路双侧减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的可行性及疗效。方法:2003年9月~2008年12月应用脊柱显微内窥镜配置改良工作通道行单侧开窗双侧潜式减压中央椎管及神经根管治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症217例,其中单节段163例,双节段54例。术后行CT和X线片检查,并按Nakai标准评定疗效。结果:手术时间25~95min,平均48±13min;术中出血25~180ml,平均37±9ml;切口长度1.8~2.4cm,平均2.2±0.2cm。术中硬脊膜撕裂2例,予明胶海绵填塞,并严格卧床2周,术后无脑脊液漏;定位错误1例,术中予以纠正;无神经损伤、术后感染等手术并发症。术后CT显示椎管减压充分。随访3~24个月,平均14个月,末次随访时按Nakai标准评定,优134例,良63例,可16例,差4例,优良率为90.8%;无腰椎不稳。结论:显微内窥镜下应用改良工作通道单侧入路双侧减压治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症创伤小、并发症少、疗效确切,是治疗该疾病较理想的微创手术。 Objective:To evaluate the feasibility and clinical efficacy of the treatment of lumbar spine steno- sis by modified unilateral approach for bilateral decompression under microendoscope.Method:217 cases with degenerative lumbar spine stenosis from September 2003 to December 2008 were treated by modified unilater- al approach for bilateral decompression of central spinal canal and nerve root canal under microendoscope.A- mong them laminectomy of one segment was done in 163 cases,two segments were done in 54 cases.After surgery,the routine radiograph were carried out and the Nakai criterion was used for assessment.Result:The mean operative time was 48±13min (range,25 to 95min),the average blood loss was 37±9ml (range,25 to 180ml),the average skin incision length was 2.2±0.2cm(1.8 to 2.4cm).2 cases had dural matter tearing,which healed after filling with gelatin foam and 2 weeks bed rest,after that no eerebrospinal fluid leakage was noted after surgery.Mislocation was noted in 1 case.No nerve inury and postoperative infection occurred.Postoperative CT scan demonstrated complete decompression of the central spinal canal and nerve root canal.All patients were followed-up for an average of 14 months (range,3 months to 24 months ) .The Nakai criterion at final follow-up showed clinical excellent in 134 cases,good in 63 cases,fair in 16 cases and worse in 4 cases. with the excellent and good rate of 90.8%.No lumbar spine instability was noted.Conclusion:Treatment of de- generative lumbar spine stenosis by modified unilateral approach for bilateral decompression under microendo- scope has the merit of minimal invasive ,less complications and reliable therapeutical effect.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期15-18,共4页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
关键词 腰椎 椎管狭窄症 显微内窥镜 改良工作通道 Lumbar vertebrae Spine stenosis Microendoscope Modified channel
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1黎庆初,谭斌,刘雄文,胡辉林.显微内窥镜下应用改良器械减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2008,18(5):341-344. 被引量:18
  • 2Nakai O,Ookawa A,Yamura I. Long-term rontgenographic and functional changes in patients who were treated with fenestration for central lumbar stenosis [J].J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1991,73(6) : 1184-1191.
  • 3Smith M,Foley K.Microendoscopic discectoiny[J].Tech Neurosurg, 1997,3(6) :301-307.
  • 4Guiot BH, Khoo LT, Fesster RG. A minimally invasive technigue for decompression of lumbar spine [J].Spine,2002,27 (4):432-438.
  • 5Ikuta K,Arima J,Tanaka T, et al. Short-term result of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis : technical note[J].J Neurosurg Spine, 2005,2 (5) : 624-633.
  • 6Kim SW, Ju C, Kim CG, et al. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression:a comparative study between bilateral laminectomy and unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression[J].J Korean Neurosurg,2007,42(9) : 195-199.
  • 7Yeom JS,Kim KH,Hong SW,et al.A minimally invasive technique for L5-S1 intraforaminal disc herniations:microdiscectomy with a tubular retractor via a contralateral approach[J].J Neurosurg Spine ,2008,8(2) : 193-198.
  • 8初同伟,周跃,王建,张峡,张年春,李长青,潘勇,罗刚,张莹.显微内窥镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的并发症及其处理[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(11):818-822. 被引量:22

二级参考文献15

共引文献37

同被引文献109

  • 1林定坤,郭玉海,陈博来,陈海云.椎板间隙入路椎间盘镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症并侧隐窝狭窄的初步报告[J].中国内镜杂志,2005,11(7):758-761. 被引量:8
  • 2徐宏兵,孙常太,文良元,薛庆云,路奎元,黄公怡.65岁以上老年人腰椎管狭窄症手术治疗的临床分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2006,25(7):522-524. 被引量:17
  • 3李佛保,郑召民,邝冠明.老年性骨质疏松相关性脊柱疾病的手术治疗[J].新医学,2006,37(12):774-777. 被引量:4
  • 4Johnsson KE,Willner S.Johnsson K.Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenoss,Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1986; 11(2):107-110.
  • 5Yone K,Sakou T.Kawauchi Y.et al.Indication of fusion for lumbar spinal stenasis in elderly patients and its significance Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2006; 21(2):242-248.
  • 6Suratwala SJ,Pinto MR,Gilbert TJ,et al.Functional and radiological outcomes of 360 degrees fusion of three or more motion levels in the lumbar spine for degenerative disc disease.Spine(Phila Pa 1976).2009; 34(10);E351-E358.
  • 7Eisenstein S.Fusion for spinal stenosis:a personal view.J Bone Joint Surg Br,2002; 84(1):9-10.
  • 8Nasca RJ.Lumbar spinal stenosis:surgical considerations J South Orthop Assoc,2002; 11(3):127-134.
  • 9Kalanithi PS,Patil CG,Boakye M.National complication rates and disposition after posterior lumbar fusion for acquired spondylolisthesis.Spine(Phila Pa1976),2009; 34(18):1963-1969.
  • 10Malter AD,McNeney B,Loeser JD,et al.5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery.Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1938; 23(7):814-820.

引证文献6

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部