论“圈序认同”对中国外交理论与实践的影响被引量：21

"Identity in Circular Sequence":Implications for Building China's IR and Foreign Affairs Theories

导出

摘要无论是古代还是当代的中国外交实践背后,都或多或少拥有一种迥异于西方二元认同的由近及远、认同递减、文化外推的思维,我们不妨称之为"圈层思维"、"圈序认同"。圈序认同形成于古代中国的地缘安全环境,其核心是文化中心意识与礼治序列,其制度背景是朝贡国际体制。几千年来,圈序认同已经成为中国人的民族性格和外交文化心理,它是民族复兴与文化创新不能忽视的文化结构,对目前中国国际关系与外交理论建设有着多重的影响与启示。在国际体系转型与和平发展的新时代,对其进行研究尤为必要。 No matter in ancient or modern times,China's diplomatic practices embodied such a kind of world outlook that identification decreased from the close to the remote while culture spread out,which is totally different form the western dualistic identity.We might call it 'identity in circular sequence(ICS)'.ICS originated in ancient China's geopolitical environment,the main idea was culture-centered consciousness and rule of rite,supported by tributary international system.For thousands of years,ICS has already become the collective unconsciousness and cultural psychology of Chinese people.Such cultural structure should not be ignored in China's national revival and cultural innovation;it is also a key factor in building China theory of IR and foreign affairs.When international system is in transformation and China pursues peaceful development,it has much significance to study ICS in Chinese history.

作者郭树勇陈建军

机构地区上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院

出处《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第12期47-57,共11页 World Economics and Politics

关键词中国文化圈序认同理论建设

分类号 D820 [政治法律—外交学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献3

1邢义田.《天下一家--中国人的天下观》,载刘岱编.《中国文化新论(根源篇)》,台北:联经出版事业公司,1983年版,第454-455页.
2对国际社会等级结构的一种调研[J].欧洲研究,1996,17(3):4-12. 被引量：12
3秦亚青,魏玲.结构、进程与权力的社会化——中国与东亚地区合作[J].世界经济与政治,2007(3):7-15. 被引量：93

二级参考文献43

1[英]巴里·布赞理查德·利特尔刘德斌译.《世界历史中的国际体系—国际关系研究的再构建》[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004年..
2Amy Seafight, "Process and the Art of Diplomacy in Asian Multilateralism : The United States, Japan, and China Compared," Paper presented at the Conference of " East Asia Cooperation and Sino - U, S, Relations," Beijing, China, November 3-4, 2005,
3Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1999.
4Alexander Wendt, "Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics," International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2,1992, pp. 391 -452.
5Martha Finnemore, National Interests in International Society, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.
6Martha Finnemore, National Interests in International Society, pp.34 - 68.
7Qin Yaqing, "East Asian Regionalism : A Process - focused Model," Paper presented at the Conference of "East Asia Cooperation and Sino- U.S. Relations," Beijing, China, November 3-4, 2005.
8王正毅.《亚洲区域化：从理性主义走向社会建构主义》，载[加拿大]阿米塔·阿查亚著，王正毅,冯怀信译.《建构安全共同体：东盟与地区秩序》，上海：上海人民出版社，2004年版，第6～7页.
9Friedrich Kratochwil, " Is the Ship of Culture at Sea or Returning," in Yosef Lapid and Friedrich Kratochwil, eds. , The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory, pp. 217 -218.
10Maja Zehfuss, Constructivism in International Relations - The Politics of Reality, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2002, p. 96.