期刊文献+

Understanding the “Horizontal Dimension” of Molecular Evolution to Annotate, Classify, and Discover Proteins with Functional Domains

Understanding the "Horizontal Dimension" of Molecular Evolution to Annotate, Classify, and Discover Proteins with Functional Domains
原文传递
导出
摘要 Protein evolution proceeds by two distinct processes: 1) individual mutation and selection for adaptive mutations and 2) rearrangement of entire domains within proteins into novel combinations, producing new protein families that combine functional properties in ways that previously did not exist. Domain rearrangement poses a challenge to sequence alignment-based search methods, such as BLAST, in predicting homology since the methodology implicitly assumes that related proteins primarily differ from each other by individual mutations. Moreover, there is ample evidence that the evolutionary process has used (and continues to use) domains as building blocks, therefore, it seems fit to utilize computational, domain-based methods to reconstruct that process. A challenge and opportunity for computational biology is how to use knowledge of evolutionary domain recombination to characterize families of proteins whose evolutionary history includes such recombination, to discover novel proteins, and to infer protein-protein interactions. In this paper we review techniques and databases that exploit our growing knowledge of “horizontal” protein evolution, and suggest possible areas of future development. We illustrate the power of the domain-based methods and the possible directions of future development by a case history in progress aiming at facilitating a particular approach to understanding microbial pathogenicity. Protein evolution proceeds by two distinct processes: 1) individual mutation and selection for adaptive mutations and 2) rearrangement of entire domains within proteins into novel combinations, producing new protein families that combine functional properties in ways that previously did not exist. Domain rearrangement poses a challenge to sequence alignment-based search methods, such as BLAST, in predicting homology since the methodology implicitly assumes that related proteins primarily differ from each other by individual mutations. Moreover, there is ample evidence that the evolutionary process has used (and continues to use) domains as building blocks, therefore, it seems fit to utilize computational, domain-based methods to reconstruct that process. A challenge and opportunity for computational biology is how to use knowledge of evolutionary domain recombination to characterize families of proteins whose evolutionary history includes such recombination, to discover novel proteins, and to infer protein-protein interactions. In this paper we review techniques and databases that exploit our growing knowledge of “horizontal” protein evolution, and suggest possible areas of future development. We illustrate the power of the domain-based methods and the possible directions of future development by a case history in progress aiming at facilitating a particular approach to understanding microbial pathogenicity.
出处 《Journal of Computer Science & Technology》 SCIE EI CSCD 2010年第1期82-94,共13页 计算机科学技术学报(英文版)
基金 supported by NSF of USA under Grant Nos. 0835718 and 0235792 NIH under Grant Nos. 5PN2EY016570-06 and5R01NS063405-02 the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology the National Center for Supercomputing Applications the Renaissance Computing Institute
关键词 domain-based discovery domain-based orthology domain interactions INTERPRO MEME/MAST domain-based discovery, domain-based orthology, domain interactions, InterPro, MEME/MAST
  • 相关文献

参考文献72

  • 1Hunter S, Apweiler R, Attwood T K et al. InterPro: The integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res., 2009, 37(Database Issue): D211-D215.
  • 2Orengo C A, Thornton J M. Protein families and their evolution A structural perspective. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 2005, 74(1): 867-900.
  • 3Apic G, Gough J, Teiehmann S A. Domain combinations in archaeal, eubacterial and eukaryotic proteomes. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2001, 310(2): 311-325.
  • 4Bjorklund A K, Ekman D, Light S, Prey-Skott J, Elofsson A. Domain rearrangements in protein evolution. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2005, 353(4): 911-923.
  • 5Moore A D, Bjorklund A K, Ekman D, Bornberg-Bauer E, Elofsson A. Arrangements in the modular evolution of proteins. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 2008, 33(9): 444-451.
  • 6Woese C R, Fox G E. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: The primary kingdoms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1977, 74(11): 5088-5090.
  • 7Tasneem A, Iyer L, Jakobsson E, Aravind L. Identification of the prokaryotic ligand-gated ion channels and their implications for the mechanisms and origins of animal Cys-loop ion channels. Genome Biology, 2004, 6(1): R4.
  • 8Bocquet N, L Prado de Carvalho, Cartaud Jet al. A prokaryotic proton-gated ion channel from the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor family. Nature, 2007, 445(7123): 116-119.
  • 9Hilf R J C, Dutzler R. X-ray structure of a prokaryotic pentameric ligand-gated ion channel. Nature, 2008, 452(7185): 375-379.
  • 10Mulder N, Apweiler R. InterPro and InterProScan: Tools for protein sequence classification and comparison. Methods Mol. Biol., 2007, 396: 59-70.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部