期刊文献+

大肠癌患者腹腔冲洗液CEA、GCC和CD44v6 mRNA的检测及其临床意义 被引量:5

Detection and clinical significance of CEA,GCC and CD44v6 mRNA in peritoneal lavages of colorectal cancer patients:report of 60 cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨检测大肠癌患者术中腹腔冲洗液CEA、GCC和CD44v6 mRNA表达的临床意义。方法收集60例大肠肿瘤患者的术中腹腔冲洗液,其中大肠癌48例(大肠癌组),大肠良性病变12例(阴性对照组),以上标本均经病理学证实,并以人大肠癌细胞株SW480作为阳性对照;应用基于b-DNA信号放大的基因表达定量检测技术测定腹腔冲洗液中脱落细胞的CEA、GCC和CD44v6 mRNA表达,同时做腹腔冲洗液细胞学检查(PLC),进而结合临床相关资料分析CEA、GCC和CD44v6 mRNA表达的临床意义。结果大肠癌组腹腔冲洗液CEA、GCC、CD44v6的表达阳性率分别为43.8%(21/48)、60.4%(29/48)、31.2%(15/48),总阳性率为72.9%(35/48),高于腹腔冲洗液PLC的阳性率4.2%(2/48),上述3项指标在人大肠癌细胞株SW480中表达均为阳性;在阴性对照组中有1例CEA mRNA检出阳性,其余均为阴性表达。不同Dukes分期、肿瘤分化程度、浆膜侵犯程度、是否淋巴结转移对CEA、GCC和CD44v6 mRNA的阳性率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),不同肿瘤大小、患者年龄和性别差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论检测腹腔冲洗液中CEA、GCC和CD44v6 mRNA的表达有助于大肠癌腹腔微转移的预测及术后治疗方案的制定;GCC、CD44v6可作为检测大肠癌腹腔脱落癌细胞的指标;基于b-DNA信号放大的基因表达定量检测技术是一种预测腹腔微转移的有效方法。 Objective To explore the significance of the transcripts of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), guanylyl cyclase C (GCC) and metastasis-related gene CD44v6 in peritoneal lavages of colorectal cancer patients. Methods The peritoneal lavages of 48 patients with identified colorectal cancer (colorectal cancer group) and 12 patients with benign colorectal disease (negative control group) were collected. All of the patients were pathologically confirmed. Human colorectal cancer cell line SW480 were taken as a positive control. The mRNA levels of CEA, GCC and CD44v6 in the collected cells were detected by QuantiGene Reagent System, which is a quantitative RNA detection method based on branched DNA (b-DNA) signal amplification technique. Meanwhile, cytologic examination with microscopy was performed. Results The positive expression rates of CEA, GCC and CD44v6 in the peritoneal lavages were 43.8% (21/48), 60.4% (29/48) and 31.3% (15/48) respectively, and the total positive rate was 72.9% (35/48) in colorectal cancer group, which was more sensitive than that of cytologic examination (2% , 1/48 ). All 3 marker genes were expressed in human colorectal cancer cell line SW480. There was only 1 sample positive to CEA mRNA in the negative control group. The positive rate of CEA, GCC and CD44v6 expressions were correlated with the Dukes staging, differentiation status, serosal involvement and lymph node metastasis ( P 〈 0. 05 ), but not with tumor size, patient age and gender (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion The detection of CEA, GCC and CD44v6 mRNA in peritoneal lavages is helpful for early diagnosis, prognosis assessment and suitable treatment selection for colorectal carcinoma.Similar to CEA, GCC and CD44v6 may be used as indicators for peritoneal micrometastasis of colorectal cancer. The combined application of these 3 molecular markers will improve the positive detection rate of peritoneal micrometastasis. The b-DNA signal amplification teehnique-based mRNA deteetion is more sensitive and speeific than that of eytologie examination, and is an effective way to predict peritoneal mierometastasis.
出处 《第三军医大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第1期36-40,共5页 Journal of Third Military Medical University
基金 四川省科技厅应用基础研究项目(04JY029-015-3)~~
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 肿瘤微转移 腹腔冲洗液 CEA GCC CD44V6 B-DNA QuantiGene 2.0 coloreetal eancer tumor micrometastasis peritoneal lavages carcinoembryonic antigen guanylyl cyclase C CD44v6 b-DNA QuantiGene 2.0 reagent system
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Akasu T, Sugihara K. Solitary peritoneal metastasis from colon carcinoma[J]. Surgery, 1998, 124(5): 938 -940.
  • 2Schott A, Vogel I, Knleger U, et al. Isolated tumor cells are frequently detectable in the peritoneal cavity of gastric and colorectal cancer patients and serve as a new prognostie marker[J]. Ann Surg, 1998, 227 ( 3 ) : 372 - 379.
  • 3Canales R D, Luo Y, Willey J C, et al. Evaluation of DNA microarray results with quantitative gene expression platforms[J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2006, 24(9) : 1115 - 1122.
  • 4Knudsen B S, Allen A N, McLerran D F, et al. Evaluation of branched-chain DNA assay for measurement of RNA in formalin-fixed tissues[J]. J Mol Diaqn, 2008, 10(2) : 169 -176.
  • 5Nishida S, Kitamura K, lchikawa D, et al. Molecular detection of disseminated cancer cells in the peripheral blood of patients with gastric eaneer[J]. Anticaneer Rcs, 2000, 20(3B) : 2155 -2159.
  • 6Kodera Y, Nakanishi H, Yamanura Y, et al. Prognostic value and clinical implications of disseminated cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity detected by reverse transcriptase- polymerase chain reaction and cytology[J]. Int J Cancer, 1998, 79:429 -433.
  • 7李良辉,池畔,陈大良.结直肠癌腹腔微转移的检测[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2004,7(2):151-151. 被引量:8
  • 8钱俊,郑树,中西速夫,金光幸秀,平井孝,加藤知行.实时荧光定量PCR检测大肠癌腹腔微转移及其临床意义[J].中国肿瘤,2007,16(5):351-355. 被引量:3
  • 9于洪亮,杨茂鹏,王夫景,杨维良.大肠癌腹腔灌洗液CK20及CEA mRNA的表达及意义[J].中国医师进修杂志,2007,30(6):21-23. 被引量:3
  • 10刘伟,余佩武,安杰,张超,赵永亮.腹腔冲洗液沉淀STAT3和CEA检测与胃癌腹膜微转移的研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2007,29(8):736-739. 被引量:3

二级参考文献70

共引文献24

同被引文献46

  • 1侯彦强,娄加陶,彭亮,周琳,倪健,孔宪涛,仲人前.结直肠癌组织中ECM1基因水平的测定及临床意义[J].世界华人消化杂志,2007,15(17):1960-1964. 被引量:7
  • 2Overholtzer M, Zhang J, Smolen GA, Muir B, Li W, Sgroi DC, Deng CX, Brugge JS, Haber DA. Trans- forming properties of YAP, a candidate oncogene on the chromosome 11q22 amplicon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:12405-12410.
  • 3Zhao B, Wei X, Li W, Udan RS, Yang Q, Kim J, Xie J, Ikenoue T, Yu J, Li L, Zheng P, Ye K, Chin- naiyan A, Halder G, Lai ZC, Guan KL. Inactiva- tion of YAP oncoprotein by the Hippo pathway is involved in cell contact inhibition and tissue growth control. Genes Dev 2007; 21:2747-2761.
  • 4Lam-Himlin DM, Daniels JA, Gayyed MF, Dong J, Maitra A, Pan D, Montgomery EA, Anders RA. The hippo pathway in human upper gastroin- testinal dysplasia and carcinoma: a novel onco- genic pathway. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 2006; 37: 103-109.
  • 5SongJM KeltonG WangJL.结直肠癌常用筛查方法综沭[J].中围今科医学,2008,:1115-1120.
  • 6Brunner T, Mueller C. Apoptosis in disease: about shortage and excess. Essays Biochem 2003; 39:119-130.
  • 7Steinhardt AA, Gayyed MF, Klein AP, Dong J, Maitra A, Pan D, Montgomery EA, Anders RA. Ex- pression of Yes-associated protein in common solid tumors. Hum Patho12008; 39:1582-1589.
  • 8Dong J, Feldmann G, Huang J, Wu S, Zhang N, Comerford SA, Gayyed MF, Anders RA, Maitra A, Pan D. Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell 2007; 130:1120-1133.
  • 9Pan D. Hippo signaling in organ size control Genes Dev 2007; 21:886-897.
  • 10Sudol M. Yes-associated protein (YAP65) is a pro- line-rich phosphoprotein that binds to the SH3 do- main of the Yes proto-oncogene product. Oncogene1994; 9:2145-2152.

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部